In Defense of Consciousness: The Role of Conscious and Unconscious Inputs in Consumer Choice

Although the argument that unconscious inputs are often key determinants of consumer decision making is compelling, it may be overstated, particularly with respect to consumer choice. A comparison of the role of conscious inputs (e.g., the attributes of options in the choice set) and unconscious inputs (e.g., a seemingly irrelevant observation or task) indicates that the former have a significant advantage. In particular, the impact of conscious inputs is supported by choice task norms and is less susceptible to being lost in the "noise" that is characteristic of most natural consumer environments (e.g., stores). Indeed, although consumers often have limited insight into influences and processes producing their choices, the assumption that consumers base their choices on conscious, willful evaluation of task-relevant inputs has been quite successful in explaining a wide range of phenomena. It is expected that future research will put greater emphasis on the interactions between conscious and unconscious influences.

[1]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[2]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[3]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The Creative Destruction of Decision Research , 2001 .

[4]  R. Baaren,et al.  Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation , 2003 .

[5]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[6]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[7]  Peter Wright,et al.  State-of-mind effects on the accuracy with which utility functions predict marketplace choice. , 1980 .

[8]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[9]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[10]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Are Young Children Adaptive Decision Makers? A Study of Age Differences in Information Search Behavior , 1995 .

[11]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[12]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Idiosyncratic Fit Heuristic: Effort Advantage as a Determinant of Consumer Response to Loyalty Programs , 2003 .

[14]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[15]  R. Dhar,et al.  Making Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting versus Balancing: , 1999 .

[16]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[17]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers , 1987 .

[18]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  The Emergence of Adaptive Decision Making in Children , 1997 .

[19]  E. Tulving,et al.  Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words , 1966 .

[20]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Extending Compromise Effect Models to Complex Buying Situations and Other Context Effects , 2004 .

[21]  S. Epstein Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[22]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[23]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[24]  P. Slovic Choice Between Equally Valued Alternatives. , 1975 .

[25]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Losing Consciousness: Automatic Influences on Consumer Judgment, Behavior, and Motivation , 2002 .

[26]  E. Higgins Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[27]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The Automatic Evaluation of Novel Stimuli , 2002, Psychological science.

[28]  Joshua Klayman,et al.  Children's decision strategies and their adaptation to task characteristics , 1985 .

[29]  D. Wigboldus,et al.  The Unconscious Consumer: Effects of Environment on Consumer Behavior , 2005 .

[30]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  A. Dijksterhuis Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[33]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  J. Bargh The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .