Reliability and limitations of a novel terrestrial laser scanner for daily monitoring of forest canopy dynamics

Abstract Leaf area index (LAI) or plant area index (PAI) are commonly used to represent canopy structure and dynamics, but daily estimation of these variables using traditional ground-based methods is impractical and prone to multiple errors during data acquisition and processing. Existing terrestrial laser scanners can provide accurate representation of forest canopy structure, but the sensors are expensive, data processing is complex, and measurements are typically confined to a single event, which severely limits their utility in the interpretation of canopy trends indicated by remotely sensed data. We tested a novel, low-cost terrestrial laser scanner for its capacity to provide reliable and successive assessments of canopy PAI in an evergreen eucalypt forest. Daily scans comprised of 920 range measurements were made by three scanners at one forest site over a two-year period, providing mostly consecutive estimates of PAI, and of vertical structure profiles (as Plant Area Volume Density, PAVD). Data filtering, involving objective statistical methods to identify outliers, indicated that scan quality was adversely affected by moist weather and moderate wind speeds (> 4 m s − 1 ), suggesting limited utility in some forest environments. Data cleaning (associated with sensor malfunctions) plus filtering removed 32 to 49% of scans, leaving on average 57% of data over the two-year period. Nonetheless, we found strong agreement between lidar-derived PAI estimates, and those from monthly hemispherical images (± 0.1 PAI); with both methods indicating mostly stable PAI over multiple seasons. The PAVD profiles from the laser scanner indicated that leaf flush in the upper canopy concomitantly balanced leaf loss from the middle canopy in summer, which was consistent with measured summer peaks in litter fall. This clearly illustrated the advantages of three-dimensional lidar data over traditional two-dimensional PAI estimates in monitoring tree phenology, and in interpreting changes in canopy reflectance as detected by air- and space-borne remotely sensed data.

[1]  J. Cihlar,et al.  Plant canopy gap-size analysis theory for improving optical measurements of leaf-area index. , 1995, Applied optics.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Leaf Area Index in Conifer and Broad-Leaf Plantations , 1991 .

[4]  N. Breda Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  I. Cañellas,et al.  Litter fall in Mediterranean Pinus pinaster Ait. stands under different thinning regimes , 2005 .

[6]  N. Coops,et al.  Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR , 2007, Trees.

[7]  M. Fournier,et al.  The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[8]  R. Leuning,et al.  Carbon and water fluxes over a temperate Eucalyptus forest and a tropical wet/dry savanna in Australia: measurements and comparison with MODIS remote sensing estimates , 2005 .

[9]  J. Singh,et al.  A quantitative study of the forest floor biomass, litter fall and nutrient return in a Pinus roxburghii forest in Kumaun Himalaya , 1987, Vegetatio.

[10]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation , 2005 .

[11]  Joachim Hill,et al.  Retrieval of Gap Fraction and Effective Plant Area Index from Phase-Shift Terrestrial Laser Scans , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[12]  H. Soegaard Fluxes of carbon dioxide, water vapour and sensible heat in a boreal agricultural area of Sweden — scaled from canopy to landscape level , 1999 .

[13]  D. Hertel,et al.  Altitudinal Change in LAI and Stand Leaf Biomass in Tropical Montane Forests: a Transect Study in Ecuador and a Pan-Tropical Meta-Analysis , 2007, Ecosystems.

[14]  James M. Vose,et al.  Seasonal changes of leaf area index (LAI) in a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico , 1995 .

[15]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[16]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Characterising forest gap fraction with terrestrial lidar and photography: An examination of relative limitations , 2014 .

[17]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest using digital photography , 2007 .

[18]  R. Specht,et al.  Foliage projective cover and standing biomass , 1981 .

[19]  F. Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling , 2004 .

[20]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Measuring Gap Fraction, Element Clumping Index and LAI in Sierra Forest Stands Using a Full-Waveform Ground-Based Lidar , 2012 .

[21]  M. Huston,et al.  A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating forest canopy leaf area , 1991 .

[22]  Alemu Gonsamo,et al.  Methodology comparison for slope correction in canopy leaf area index estimation using hemispherical photography , 2008 .

[23]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  An architectural model of trees to estimate forest structural attributes using terrestrial LiDAR , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Neil Sims,et al.  Automated In-Situ Laser Scanner for Monitoring Forest Leaf Area Index , 2014, Sensors.

[25]  N. Coops,et al.  Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests , 2003 .

[26]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Estimating forest LAI profiles and structural parameters using a ground-based laser called 'Echidna'. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[27]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  A comparison of foliage profiles in the Sierra National Forest obtained with a full-waveform under-canopy EVI lidar system with the foliage profiles obtained with an airborne full-waveform LVIS lidar system , 2013 .

[28]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Measuring forest structure and biomass in New England forest stands using Echidna ground-based lidar , 2011 .

[29]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest with vertical foliage, using cover and fullframe fisheye photography , 2007 .

[30]  S. Livesley,et al.  Reduced throughfall decreases autotrophic respiration, but not heterotrophic respiration in a dry temperate broadleaved evergreen forest , 2015 .

[31]  J. M. Norman,et al.  THE ARCHITECTURE OF A DECIDUOUS FOREST CANOPY IN EASTERN TENNESSEE, U.S.A. , 1986 .

[32]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Seasonal variation of leaf area index (LAI) over paddy rice fields in NE China: Intercomparison of destructive sampling, LAI-2200, digital hemispherical photography (DHP), and AccuPAR methods , 2014 .

[33]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Measuring leaf area index in a sparse eucalypt forest: a comparison of estimates from direct measurement, hemispherical photography, sunlight transmittance and allometric regression , 1995 .

[34]  Patrick Schleppi,et al.  Estimating leaf area index in different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of methods , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[35]  E. Pook Canopy dynamics of Eucalyptus maculata Hook. II: Canopy leaf area balance , 1984 .

[36]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  Continuous observation of tree leaf area index at ecosystem scale using upward-pointing digital cameras , 2012 .

[37]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  On the exposure of hemispherical photographs in forests , 2013 .

[38]  D. Culvenor,et al.  Using VEGNET In-Situ Monitoring LiDAR (IML) to Capture Dynamics of Plant Area Index, Structure and Phenology in Aspen Parkland Forests in Alberta, Canada , 2014 .

[39]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  Spatial patterns and temporal dynamics in savanna vegetation phenology across the North Australian Tropical Transect , 2013 .

[40]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[41]  Martin Herold,et al.  Implications of sensor configuration and topography on vertical plant profiles derived from terrestrial LiDAR , 2014 .

[42]  Andrea Cutini,et al.  Estimation of canopy properties in deciduous forests with digital hemispherical and cover photography , 2013 .

[43]  Remko A. Duursma,et al.  Physiological Ecology of Forest Production: Principles, Processes and Models , 2010 .

[44]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[45]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Measuring Effective Leaf Area Index, Foliage Profile, and Stand Height in New England Forest Stands Using a Full-Waveform Ground-Based Lidar , 2011 .

[46]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[47]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna®) , 2008 .

[48]  Jan Verbesselt,et al.  Monitoring spring phenology with high temporal resolution terrestrial LiDAR measurements , 2015 .

[49]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[50]  T. Hatton,et al.  Relating leaf area index of natural eucalypt vegetation to climate variables in southern Australia , 2008 .