Temporal and force characteristics of fast double-finger, single-finger and hand tapping

The purposes of this study were: (1) to provide descriptive temporal and force data for fast alternate tapping by the index and middle fingers (‘double-finger mode’), and to compare it with one finger fast tapping (‘single-finger mode’); (2) to determine any differences in the dynamic motor function of individual fingers with these tapping tasks; and (3) to determine any differences between the singlefinger mode and tapping with the whole hand (‘hand mode’). Eleven healthy males tapped force transducer(s) for 7 s as fast as possible using their dominant hand. The double-finger mode had a greater peak force and a 50% faster tapping frequency than the single-finger mode. There was no correlation between the single-finger and double-finger modes in the temporal data. Tapping with two fingers thus seems to be organized with a motor strategy that is different from that with one finger, and can possibly capture an individual's additional or different motor function. A comparison between the two fingers revealed that the index finger had a significantly faster tapping frequency, indicating the superiority of the index finger over the middle finger in terms of dynamic motor function. The hand mode had a significantly faster tapping frequency with greater peak force than the single-finger mode. A distinction is essential between these two modes.

[1]  J. Salamone,et al.  Temporal Measures of Human Finger Tapping: Effects of Age , 1998, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[2]  S. Ellias,et al.  Quantitative assessment of movement in Alzheimer's disease. , 1995, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[3]  H. Vanharanta,et al.  Influences of Aging, Gender, and Handedness on Motor Performance of Upper and Lower Extremities , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  E A Roy,et al.  Ipsilesional disruptions to reciprocal finger tapping. , 1992, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[5]  M. Peters,et al.  Why the Preferred Hand Taps More Quickly than the Non-preferred Hand: Three Experiments on Handedness* , 1980 .

[6]  François Michel,et al.  Hand Performance of French Children on a Finger-Tapping Test in Relation to Handedness, Sex, and Age , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  A. Weiland,et al.  Independent index extension after extensor indicis proprius transfer. , 1987, The Journal of hand surgery.

[8]  M. Schieber Individuated finger movements of rhesus monkeys: a means of quantifying the independence of the digits. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Richard L. Lieber,et al.  Muscle Architecture Basis for Neuromuscular Control of the Forearm and Hand , 1996 .

[10]  R. Lieber,et al.  Architecture of selected muscles of the arm and forearm: anatomy and implications for tendon transfer. , 1992, The Journal of hand surgery.

[11]  J Hermsdörfer,et al.  Comparative analysis of diadochokinetic movements. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  H. Nagasaki,et al.  Characteristic difficulty in rhythmic movement with aging and its relation to Parkinson's disease. , 1988, Experimental aging research.

[13]  H Kinoshita,et al.  Grip posture and forces during holding cylindrical objects with circular grips. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[14]  A. Gordon,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor, sensory, and posterior parietal cortical areas during performance of sequential typing movements , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  J. Webster,et al.  External finger forces in submaximal five-finger static pinch prehension. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[16]  R. Kemp,et al.  Differences Between Fingers and Hands in Tapping Ability: Dissociation Between Speed and Regularity , 1986, Cortex.

[17]  S. Cramer,et al.  Computerized measurement of motor performance after stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[18]  Tasuku Kimura,et al.  Aging Effect on Tapping Frequency Assessed by Hand Dominance , 1999 .

[19]  D J Glencross,et al.  The effect of temporal and force changes on the patterning of sequential movements , 1993, Psychological research.

[20]  T. Krahe,et al.  The effects of hand preference and gender on finger tapping performance asymmetry by the use of an infra-red light measurement device , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Specialized Neural Systems Underlying Representations of Sequential Movements , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Konczak,et al.  Control of repetitive lip and finger movements in parkinson's disease: Influence of external timing signals and simultaneous execution on motor performance , 1997, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[23]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  Activation Force and Travel effects on Overexertion in Repetitive Key Tapping , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[24]  M. Peters,et al.  Prolonged Practice of a Simple Motor Task by Preferred and Nonpreferred Hands , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[25]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  G de Groot,et al.  The strength of the hand. , 1970, Bulletin of prosthetics research.