Fishing out collective memory of migratory schools

Animals form groups for many reasons, but there are costs and benefits associated with group formation. One of the benefits is collective memory. In groups on the move, social interactions play a crucial role in the cohesion and the ability to make consensus decisions. When migrating from spawning to feeding areas, fish schools need to retain a collective memory of the destination site over thousands of kilometres, and changes in group formation or individual preference can produce sudden changes in migration pathways. We propose a modelling framework, based on stochastic adaptive networks, that can reproduce this collective behaviour. We assume that three factors control group formation and school migration behaviour: the intensity of social interaction, the relative number of informed individuals and the strength of preference that informed individuals have for a particular migration area. We treat these factors independently and relate the individuals’ preferences to the experience and memory for certain migration sites. We demonstrate that removal of knowledgeable individuals or alteration of individual preference can produce rapid changes in group formation and collective behaviour. For example, intensive fishing targeting the migratory species and also their preferred prey can reduce both terms to a point at which migration to the destination sites is suddenly stopped. The conceptual approaches represented by our modelling framework may therefore be able to explain large-scale changes in fish migration and spatial distribution.

[1]  Gerd Zschaler,et al.  Adaptive-network models of swarm dynamics , 2010, 1009.2349.

[2]  Gaston H. Gonnet,et al.  On the LambertW function , 1996, Adv. Comput. Math..

[3]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[4]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[8]  G. Huse,et al.  Modelling changes in migration pattern of herring: collective behaviour and numerical domination , 2002 .

[9]  I. Giardina.  Collective Animal Behavior David J.T. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  W. A. Wolovich.  The State Space , 1974 .

[11]  J. Krause,et al.  Relationship between the position preference and nutritional state of individuals in schools of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  Social learning in fishes : a review , 2003 .

[13]  K. A. Bekiashev,et al.  International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) , 1981 .

[14]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Consensus Decision Making by Fish , 2008, Current Biology.

[15]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S12 Table S1 Full Reference List , 2022 .

[16]  D. Sumpter.  Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[17]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[18]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[19]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[20]  I. Couzin,et al.  Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  G. Huse,et al.  Stock collapses and their recovery: mechanisms that establish and maintain life-cycle closure in space and time , 2010 .

[22]  Giancarlo De Luca.  Decision Making in Complex Environments: an adaptive network approach , 2013 .

[23]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Information transfer in moving animal groups , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.

[24]  K. Laland,et al.  Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences , 2012, Interface Focus.

[26]  Stefan Krause,et al.  Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Matteo Marsili,et al.  Networks Emerging in a Volatile World , 2008 .

[28]  D. Vere-Jones.  Markov Chains , 1972, Nature.

[29]  J. Krause,et al.  The role of individuality in collective group movement , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  L. Conradt.  Collective behaviour: When it pays to share decisions , 2011, Nature.

[31]  Matteo Marsili,et al.  Phenomenological models of socioeconomic network dynamics. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  H. Chaté,et al.  Modeling collective motion: variations on the Vicsek model , 2008 .

[34]  E. Knut,et al.  Paris Meeting of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea , 1923, Nature.

[35]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  Leadership, collective motion and the evolution of migratory strategies , 2011, Communicative & integrative biology.