Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison.

Symmetry is a major correlate of physical attractiveness across species, including humans. Investigating the nature of this relationship has been difficult, however, for several reasons, including the facts that variance in symmetry is attributable to more than one source and is often correlated with other variables related to attractiveness. This study assessed the role of facial symmetry in relation to perceptions of facial attractiveness. Some of the natural covariates of symmetry were controlled for by comparing the symmetry and attractiveness differentials between monozygotic co-twins, who are genetically, but not developmentally, identical. The more symmetric twin of a pair was consistently rated as more attractive, and the magnitude of the difference between twins in perceived attractiveness was directly related to the magnitude of the difference in symmetry.

[1]  L. Cronbach The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[2]  R. McGinnis Campus Values in Mate Selection: A Repeat Study , 1958 .

[3]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A STUDY OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY , 1962 .

[4]  E. Walster,et al.  Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  B. Campbell Forces and Strategies in Evolution. (Book Reviews: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971) , 1972 .

[6]  M. Daly,et al.  Sex, evolution, and behavior , 1978 .

[7]  J Tooby,et al.  Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  I H Bernstein,et al.  Cross- vs. within-racial judgments of attractiveness , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[10]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human rape: An evolutionary analysis , 1983 .

[11]  D. Buss,et al.  Evolutionary biology and personality psychology. Toward a conception of human nature and individual differences. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[12]  Therese Ann Markow,et al.  Fluctuating dermatoglyphic asymmetry and the genetics of liability to schizophrenia , 1986, Psychiatry Research.

[13]  M. Cunningham Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[14]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Fluctuating Asymmetry: Measurement, Analysis, Patterns , 1986 .

[15]  D. Krebs,et al.  Sociobiology and psychology : ideas, issues, and applications , 1987 .

[16]  T. Reed,et al.  Asymmetry ofa-b ridge count and behavioral discordance of monozygotic twins , 1987, Behavior genetics.

[17]  J. Alexander,et al.  Sex hormones and the course of parasitic infection , 1988 .

[18]  D. Buss The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  P. Casamassimo,et al.  Crown size asymmetry in males with fra (X) or Martin-Bell syndrome. , 1988, American journal of medical genetics.

[20]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  J C Loehlin,et al.  Partitioning environmental and genetic contributions to behavioral development. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[22]  J. Townsend,et al.  Mate selection criteria. A pilot study , 1989 .

[23]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. Simpson,et al.  Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[25]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  P. Parsons,et al.  FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY: AN EPIGENETIC MEASURE OF STRESS , 1990, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[28]  E. Kobyliansky,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: a review. , 1991, Human biology.

[29]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Facial Diversity and InfantPreferences for Attractive Faces , 1991 .

[30]  A. Møller,et al.  Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: implications for models of sexual selection , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Marlene Zuk,et al.  The Role of Parasites in Sexual Selection: Current Evidence and Future Directions , 1992 .

[32]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[33]  C. Wedekind Detailed information about parasites revealed by sexual ornamentation , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[35]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera) , 1992 .

[36]  J T Manning,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry, sexual selection and canine teeth in primates , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Is beauty in the eye of the beholder , 1993 .

[38]  Joan C. Borod,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms underlying facial, prosodic, and lexical emotional expression: A review of neuropsychological studies and methodological issues. , 1993 .

[39]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  N. Segal,et al.  Twin, sibling, and adoption methods. Tests of evolutionary hypotheses. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[41]  Doug Jones,et al.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations , 1993, Human nature.

[42]  Steven W. Gangestad,et al.  Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences , 1993 .

[43]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human facial beauty , 1993, Human nature.

[44]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[45]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. , 1994 .

[46]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[47]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[48]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  J. Udry,et al.  Dominant looking male teenagers copulate earlier , 1994 .

[50]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Behavior , 1994 .

[51]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[52]  R. Trivers,et al.  The science of symmetry in biology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply] , 1995, Current Anthropology.

[55]  D. Symons Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. , 1995 .

[56]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  N. Barber The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology , 1995 .

[58]  Paul R. Abramson,et al.  Sexual nature, sexual culture , 1995 .

[59]  R. Kowner,et al.  Laterality in facial expressions and its effect on attributions of emotion and personality: A reconsideration , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  D. Buss,et al.  Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. , 1996, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[61]  R. Kowner,et al.  Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolution of human sexuality. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  Linda Mealey,et al.  Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters , 1996 .

[64]  K. Schartz,et al.  Nature, Nurture, and Twin Research Strategies , 1997 .

[65]  R. Larsen,et al.  Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human sexual selection and developmental stability. , 1997 .

[67]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[68]  C. Halverson,et al.  Family Influences on Personality Development , 1997 .

[69]  K. Phillips,et al.  Personality Processes and Individual Differences Evidence for Genetic Influence on Both Cross-situation and Situation-specific Components of Behavior , 2022 .

[70]  J. Höglund,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and copulation success in lekking black grouse , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and psychometric intelligence , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[72]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[73]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Does Human Facial Attractiveness Honestly Advertise Health? Longitudinal Data on an Evolutionary Question , 1998 .

[74]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.