Per cent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle: PREEMPT

Objective The approved use of onabotulinumtoxinA for prophylaxis of headaches in patients with chronic migraine (CM) involves treatment every 12 weeks. It is currently unknown whether patients who fail to respond to the first onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle will respond to subsequent treatment cycles. To help inform decisions about treating non-responders, we examined the probability of treatment cycle 1 non-responders responding in cycle 2, and cycle 1 and 2 non-responders responding in cycle 3. Methods Pooled PREEMPT data (two studies: a 24-week, 2-cycle, double-blind, randomised (1:1), placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase, followed by a 32-week, 3-cycle, open-label phase) evaluated onabotulinumtoxinA (155–195 U) for prophylaxis of headaches in persons with CM (≥15 days/month with headache ≥4 h/day). End points of interest included the proportion of study patients who first achieved a ≥50% reduction in headache days, moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, or a ≥5-point improvement in Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6. For treatment cycle 1, all eligible participants were included. For subsequent cycles, responders in a previous cycle were no longer considered first responders. Results Among onabotulinumtoxinA-treated patients (n=688) 49.3% had a ≥50% reduction in headache-day frequency during treatment cycle 1, with 11.3% and 10.3% of patients first responding during cycles 2 and 3, respectively. 54.2%, 11.6% and 7.4% of patients first responded with a ≥50% reduction in cumulative hours of headache, and 56.3%, 14.5% and 7.7% of patients first responded with a ≥5-point improvement in total HIT-6 during treatment cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions A meaningful proportion of patients with CM treated with onabotulinumtoxinA who did not respond to the first treatment cycle responded in the second and third cycles of treatment. Trial registration number NCT00156910, NCT00168428.

[1]  R. Ohrbach,et al.  The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) , 2013, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[2]  S. Haque Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the East London and City Health Authority Ethic Committee. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. , 2011 .

[3]  H. Diener,et al.  OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial , 2010, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[4]  R. Lipton,et al.  Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Prophylactic Treatment of Chronic Migraine in Adults , 2008, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[5]  Jes Olesen,et al.  The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. , 2004, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[6]  H. Diener,et al.  OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial , 2010, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[7]  A. Dowson,et al.  A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™ , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  H. Blumenthal Migraine Prevention , 2006, Headache.

[9]  S. Aurora Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of migraine , 2006, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[10]  Patrick D. Wall,et al.  Central hyperexcitability triggered by noxious inputs , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  M. Brin,et al.  Selective inhibition of meningeal nociceptors by botulinum neurotoxin type A: Therapeutic implications for migraine and other pains , 2014, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[12]  D. Dodick,et al.  Chronic Daily Headache , 2006 .

[13]  J. Farrar,et al.  Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale , 2001, PAIN.

[14]  J. Olesen The International Classification of Headache Disorders , 2008, Headache.

[15]  R. Lipton,et al.  Global prevalence of chronic migraine: A systematic review , 2010, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[16]  H. Diener,et al.  OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients who received all five treatment cycles in the PREEMPT clinical program , 2013, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[17]  S. Silberstein,et al.  Method of Injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Chronic Migraine: A Safe, Well‐Tolerated, and Effective Treatment Paradigm Based on the PREEMPT Clinical Program , 2010, Headache.

[18]  Ferrari,et al.  Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine: Second Edition , 2000, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[19]  S. Aurora,et al.  OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Pooled Analyses of the 56‐Week PREEMPT Clinical Program , 2011, Headache.

[20]  T. Doubell,et al.  The pathophysiology of chronic pain — increased sensitivity to low threshold Aβ-fibre inputs , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  D. Dodick Clinical practice. Chronic daily headache. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Lipton,et al.  Chronic migraine in the population , 2008, Neurology.

[23]  N. Mathew The Prophylactic Treatment of Chronic Daily Headache , 2006, Headache.

[24]  K. Aoki,et al.  Updates on the antinociceptive mechanism hypothesis of botulinum toxin A. , 2011, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[25]  C. Woolf,et al.  Somatic pain--pathogenesis and prevention. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[26]  M. Brin,et al.  OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Pooled Results From the Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Phases of the PREEMPT Clinical Program , 2010, Headache.