Simultaneous Registration and Modeling of Deformable Shapes

Many natural objects vary the shapes as linear combinations of certain bases. The measurement of such deformable shapes is coupling of rigid similarity transformations between the objects and the measuring systems and non-rigid deformations controlled by the linear bases. Thus registration and modeling of deformable shapes are coupled problems, where registration is to compute the rigid transformations and modeling is to construct the linear bases. The previous methods [3, 2] separate the solution into two steps. The first step registers the measurements regarding the shapes as rigid and the deformations as random noise. The second step constructs the linear model using the registered shapes. Since the deformable shapes do not vary randomly but are constrained by the underlying model, such separate steps result in registration biased by nonrigid deformations and shape models involving improper rigid transformations. We for the first time present this bias problem and formulate that, the coupled registration and modeling problems are essentially a single factorization problem and thus require a simultaneous solution. We then propose the Direct Factorization method that extends a structure from motion method [16]. It yields a linear closedform solution that simultaneously registers the deformable shapes at arbitrary dimensions (2D \to 2D, 3D \to 3D, . . .) and constructs the linear bases. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed approach are demonstrated quantitatively on synthetic data and qualitatively on real shapes.

[1]  I. Dryden Statistical analysis on high-dimensional spheres and shape spaces , 2005, math/0508279.

[2]  J. Berge,et al.  Orthogonal procrustes rotation for two or more matrices , 1977 .

[3]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[4]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models - 'smart snakes' , 1992, BMVC.

[5]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Deborah F. Swayne,et al.  A weighted procrustes criterion , 1991 .

[7]  P. Schönemann,et al.  A solution to the weighted procrustes problem in which the transformation is in agreement with the loss function , 1976 .

[8]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[9]  P. Schönemann,et al.  Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion , 1970 .

[10]  P. Schönemann,et al.  A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem , 1966 .

[11]  Henning Biermann,et al.  Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[12]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Robust real-time myocardial border tracking for echocardiography: an information fusion approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  An Adaptive-Focus Deformable Model Using Statistical and Geometric Information , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  A shape-space-based approach to tracking myocardial borders and quantifying regional left-ventricular function applied in echocardiography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Jing Xiao,et al.  A Closed-Form Solution to Non-Rigid Shape and Motion Recovery , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.