Home versus ambulatory and office blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Studies have shown that ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is more closely related to preclinical target organ damage than office measurements. A review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the association of home BP measurements with target organ damage was performed. Methods: A PubMed and Cochrane Library search (1950–2011) revealed 23 studies reporting comparative data of home BP versus ambulatory and/or office measurements in terms of their association with several indices of target organ damage. Correlation coefficients were pooled by random-effects model meta-analysis. Results: Fourteen studies (n = 2485) assessing echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) showed similar correlations with home (coefficients r = 0.46/0.28, systolic/diastolic) as with ambulatory BP (0.37/0.26, P = NS for difference versus home BP), and superior to office measurements (r = 0.23/0.19, P < 0.001/0.009 for difference versus home BP). Four methodologically heterogeneous studies assessing the glomerular filtration rate (n = 609) could not be pooled or lead to a concrete result. Four studies assessing carotid intima–media thickness (n = 1222), three assessing pulse wave velocity (n = 720) and two assessing urinary protein excretion (n = 156) showed no difference in pooled correlation coefficients with home versus office BP measurements. With all the measurement methods SBP was more closely associated with target organ damage than DBP. Conclusion: These data suggest that home BP is as good as ambulatory monitoring and superior to office measurements in regard to their association with preclinical organ damage assessed by echocardiographic LVMI. More research is required to evaluate the relationship of home BP with other indices of target organ damage.

[1]  Philippe Van De Borne,et al.  Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension , 2014 .

[2]  G. Stergiou,et al.  Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension: a systematic review. , 2011, American journal of hypertension.

[3]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Home blood pressure as a cardiovascular outcome predictor: it's time to take this method seriously. , 2010, Hypertension.

[4]  A. Jula,et al.  Optimal schedule for home blood pressure monitoring based on a clinical approach , 2010, Journal of hypertension.

[5]  T. Nakao,et al.  Prognostic significance of home blood pressure control on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease , 2009, Hypertension Research.

[6]  A. Jula,et al.  Home blood pressure has a stronger association with arterial stiffness than clinic blood pressure: the Finn-Home Study , 2009, Blood pressure monitoring.

[7]  Y. Imai,et al.  Morning home blood pressure may be a significant marker of nephropathy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: ADVANCED-J study 1 , 2009, Hypertension Research.

[8]  P. Gosse,et al.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus self-measurement of blood pressure at home: correlation with target organ damage , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[9]  B. Sinha,et al.  Statistical Meta-Analysis with Applications , 2008 .

[10]  Yutaka Imai,et al.  European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[11]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Noninvasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[12]  T. Ikeda,et al.  Morning Rise of Blood Pressure Assessed by Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Is Associated with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients Receiving Long-Term Antihypertensive Medication , 2007, Hypertension Research.

[13]  G. Stergiou,et al.  Home blood pressure is as reliable as ambulatory blood pressure in predicting target-organ damage in hypertension. , 2007, American journal of hypertension.

[14]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Home-measured blood pressure is more strongly associated with atherosclerosis than clinic blood pressure: the Finn–HOME Study , 2007, Journal of hypertension.

[15]  A. Dominiczak,et al.  2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2007, European heart journal.

[16]  Joseph E Schwartz,et al.  Relative utility of home, ambulatory, and office blood pressures in the prediction of end-organ damage. , 2007, American journal of hypertension.

[17]  Teresa Sancho,et al.  Home blood pressure in poorly controlled hypertension: relationship with ambulatory blood pressure and organ damage , 2006, Blood pressure monitoring.

[18]  Roberto Sega,et al.  Long-Term Risk of Mortality Associated With Selective and Combined Elevation in Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure , 2006, Hypertension.

[19]  T. Hosoya,et al.  Morning blood pressure predicts hypertensive organ damage in patients with renal diseases: effect of intensive antihypertensive therapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy. , 2005, Internal medicine.

[20]  Roberto Sega,et al.  Prognostic Value of Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressures Compared With Office Blood Pressure in the General Population: Follow-Up Results From the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) Study , 2005, Circulation.

[21]  Y. Kanno,et al.  Decline of Renal Function Is Associated with Proteinuria and Systolic Blood Pressure in the Morning in Diabetic Nephropathy , 2005, Clinical and experimental hypertension.

[22]  S. Kinugasa,et al.  Morning rise in blood pressure is a predictor of left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients. , 2004, Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

[23]  K. Kohara,et al.  Home blood pressure is a better predictor of carotid atherosclerosis than office blood pressure in community-dwelling subjects. , 2004, Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

[24]  F. Magrini,et al.  Left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients with good blood pressure control outside the clinic, but poor clinic blood pressure control , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[25]  R. Asmar,et al.  Arterial stiffness and blood pressure self-measurement with loaned equipment. , 2003, American journal of hypertension.

[26]  Yutaka Imai,et al.  European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[27]  Giuseppe Andronico,et al.  Value of Home Blood Pressures as Predictor of Target Organ Damage in Mild Arterial Hypertension , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular risk.

[28]  B. Boned,et al.  [Comparison of clinical arterial pressure, home-arterial pressure measurement, and ambulatory arterial pressure monitoring in patients with type II diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy]. , 2002, Nefrologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia.

[29]  G. Parati,et al.  Task Force II: Blood pressure measurement and cardiovacular outcome , 2001, Blood pressure monitoring.

[30]  J. Sterne,et al.  Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  G Parati,et al.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Organ Damage , 2000, Hypertension.

[32]  W. Kannel,et al.  Elevated systolic blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  Gianfranco Parati,et al.  Task Force III: Target-organ damage, morbidity and mortality , 1999 .

[34]  G Parati,et al.  Blood Pressure Monitoring. Task force III: Target-organ damage, morbidity and mortality. , 1999, Blood pressure monitoring.

[35]  Y. Imai Prognostic significance of ambulatory blood pressure. , 1999, Blood pressure monitoring.

[36]  P. Whelton,et al.  Elevated systolic blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular and renal disease: overview of evidence from observational epidemiologic studies and randomized controlled trials. , 1999, American heart journal.

[37]  A. Jula,et al.  Multiple clinic and home blood pressure measurements versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. , 1999, Hypertension.

[38]  T. Heise,et al.  Value of blood pressure self-monitoring as a predictor of progression of diabetic nephropathy. , 1999, Journal of hypertension.

[39]  A. Smit,et al.  Home blood pressure measurement: reproducibility and relationship with left ventricular mass. , 1999, Blood pressure monitoring.

[40]  D. Mion Júnior,et al.  [Home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure measurement versus office blood pressure measurement]. , 1998, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[41]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[42]  Giuseppe Mancia,et al.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Is Superior to Clinic Blood Pressure in Predicting Treatment-Induced Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy , 1997 .

[43]  G Mancia,et al.  Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation. , 1997, Circulation.

[44]  M. Myers Twenty‐four‐hour blood pressure control: a brief review of aspects of target‐organ protection , 1996, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[45]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[46]  R. Devereux,et al.  Relationship between the level, pattern and variability of ambulatory blood pressure and target organ damage in hypertension. , 1991, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[47]  N Reichek,et al.  Echocardiographic Determination of Left Ventricular Mass in Man: Anatomic Validation of the Method , 1977, Circulation.