Investigation of Vehicle Detector Performance and ATMS Interface

This research supplemented findings of previous research projects on the topic of vehicle detection. Because improvements in performance aspects and in functionality of non-intrusive vehicle detectors continue to occur at an ever increasing pace, there were reasons to continue testing of the most viable products and determine their interface potential with other components of the Texas Department of Transportation’s (TxDOT’s) existing system. Like previous vehicle detector research, this research tested the latest and most promising non-intrusive vehicle detector technologies. The ones included in this research were: video image vehicle detection systems (VIVDS), acoustic, magnetic, inductive loops, and microwave radar. Besides evaluating detectors, the research scope also included investigating an interface with TxDOT’s current Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) using contact closure inputs to current Local Control Units (LCUs) for collecting vehicle count, speed, and occupancy data. Findings of this research indicate that, of the detectors tested, the following technologies appear to be most promising for freeway applications based on cost, accuracy, and ease of setup: microwave radar and magnetometers. One of the VIVDS units tested was also accurate but its cost and ease of setup were inferior to the other two. Neither of the two technologies is affected by weather and they are capable of consistently achieving 95 percent count accuracy (or better) and can detect speeds to within 5 mph of true speeds.

[1]  Stephen L M Hockaday,et al.  EVALUATION OF VIDEO IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR TRAFFIC DETECTION (ABRIDGMENT) , 1992 .

[2]  J Bing,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRAFFIC MONITORING SENSORS , 1994 .

[3]  L A Klein,et al.  Detection Technology for IVHS: Volume I: Final Report , 1996 .

[4]  P D Prevedouros INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC DETECTORS FOR USE IN HAWAII: DETECTOR INSTALLATIONS AND TESTS , 2004 .

[5]  Sinem Coleri,et al.  Traffic Measurement and Vehicle Classification with a Single Magnetic Sensor , 2004 .

[6]  Helmut T. Zwahlen,et al.  Evaluation of Microwave Radar Trailers for Nonintrusive Traffic Measurements , 2005 .

[7]  Dan Middleton,et al.  INITIAL EVALUATION OF SELECTED DETECTORS TO REPLACE INDUCTIVE LOOPS ON FREEWAYS , 2000 .

[8]  L A Klein,et al.  DETECTION TECHNOLOGY FOR IVHS , 1993 .

[9]  D A Noyce,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS , 2002 .

[10]  P S Parsonson,et al.  TRAFFIC DETECTOR HANDBOOK , 1985 .

[11]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[12]  P T Martin,et al.  TRAFFIC DETECTOR SELECTION PROCEDURE (GUIDELINE DRAFT) , 2003 .

[13]  K G Courage,et al.  VIDEO IMAGE DETECTION FOR TRAFFIC SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL , 1996 .

[14]  Ronald G. Hughes,et al.  EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED PEDESTRIAN DETECTION AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 2000 .

[15]  B. Betts,et al.  Smart Sensors , 2006, IEEE Spectrum.

[16]  Jim Kranig,et al.  FIELD TEST OF MONITORING OF URBAN VEHICLE OPERATIONS USING NON- INSTRUSIVE TECHNOLOGIES : FINAL REPORT , 1997 .

[17]  Julio Faundez,et al.  Legal technical assistance , 1997 .

[18]  Montasir M Abbas,et al.  INTELLIGENT DETECTION-CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RURAL SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 2002 .

[19]  D Middleton,et al.  VEHICLE DETECTOR EVALUATION , 2002 .

[20]  Benjamin Coifman Freeway Detector Assessment: Aggregate Data from Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor , 2005 .

[21]  Dan Middleton,et al.  EVALUATION OF SOME EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR VEHICLE DETECTION , 1999 .

[22]  Benjamin Coifman Vehicle Level Evaluation of Loop Detectors and the Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor , 2006 .