Prediction of Tumor Recurrence and Therapy Monitoring Using Ultrasound-Guided Photoacoustic Imaging

Selection and design of individualized treatments remains a key goal in cancer therapeutics; prediction of response and tumor recurrence following a given therapy provides a basis for subsequent personalized treatment design. We demonstrate an approach towards this goal with the example of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as the treatment modality and photoacoustic imaging (PAI) as a non-invasive, response and disease recurrence monitor in a murine model of glioblastoma (GBM). PDT is a photochemistry-based, clinically-used technique that consumes oxygen to generate cytotoxic species, thus causing changes in blood oxygen saturation (StO2). We hypothesize that this change in StO2 can be a surrogate marker for predicting treatment efficacy and tumor recurrence. PAI is a technique that can provide a 3D atlas of tumor StO2 by measuring oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. We demonstrate that tumors responding to PDT undergo approximately 85% change in StO2 by 24-hrs post-therapy while there is no significant change in StO2 values in the non-responding group. Furthermore, the 3D tumor StO2 maps predicted whether a tumor was likely to regrow at a later time point post-therapy. Information on the likelihood of tumor regrowth that normally would have been available only upon actual regrowth (10-30 days post treatment) in a xenograft tumor model, was available within 24-hrs of treatment using PAI, thus making early intervention a possibility. Given the advances and push towards availability of PAI in the clinical settings, the results of this study encourage applicability of PAI as an important step to guide and monitor therapies (e.g. PDT, radiation, anti-angiogenic) involving a change in StO2.

[1]  François Guillemin,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of malignant brain tumours: a complementary approach to conventional therapies. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[2]  M. Mrugala,et al.  Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence. , 2009, Neurology.

[3]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Combining vascular and cellular targeting regimens enhances the efficacy of photodynamic therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  M. Kohli,et al.  Response criteria in oncologic imaging: review of traditional and new criteria. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  T. Foster,et al.  Effect of Irradiation Fluence Rate on the Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy and Tumor Oxygenation in Meta-Tetra (Hydroxyphenyl) Chlorin (mTHPC)-Sensitized HT29 Xenografts in Nude Mice1 , 2002, Radiation research.

[6]  J. Woodhams,et al.  The role of oxygen monitoring during photodynamic therapy and its potential for treatment dosimetry , 2007, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[7]  L. Lilge,et al.  Implicit and explicit dosimetry in photodynamic therapy: a New paradigm , 1997, Lasers in Medical Science.

[8]  Bruce J. Tromberg,et al.  Monitoring Tumor Response During Photodynamic Therapy Using Near-infrared Photon-migration Spectroscopy¶ , 2001, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[9]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Prospects of photoacoustic tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[10]  Da Xing,et al.  Real-time optoacoustic monitoring of vascular damage during photodynamic therapy treatment of tumor. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Light in and sound out: emerging translational strategies for photoacoustic imaging. , 2014, Cancer research.

[12]  Chris Jun Hui Ho,et al.  Multifunctional Photosensitizer-Based Contrast Agents for Photoacoustic Imaging , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[13]  A. Needles,et al.  Development and initial application of a fully integrated photoacoustic micro-ultrasound system , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[14]  Yannis M Paulus,et al.  Photoacoustic ocular imaging. , 2010, Optics letters.

[15]  Gelareh Zadeh,et al.  GBM's multifaceted landscape: highlighting regional and microenvironmental heterogeneity. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[16]  Ulas Sunar,et al.  Monitoring blood flow responses during topical ALA-PDT , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Photodynamic therapy creates fluence rate-dependent gradients in the intratumoral spatial distribution of oxygen. , 2002, Cancer research.

[18]  Michael J. Emanuele,et al.  Treatment-Induced Changes in Tumor Oxygenation Predict Photodynamic Therapy Outcome , 2004, Cancer Research.

[19]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[20]  P. Vaupel,et al.  Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  K. Polyak,et al.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  Brian Pogue,et al.  Photosensitizer fluorescence and singlet oxygen luminescence as dosimetric predictors of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy induced clinical erythema , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[23]  Arjun G. Yodh,et al.  Noninvasive Monitoring of Murine Tumor Blood Flow During and After Photodynamic Therapy Provides Early Assessment of Therapeutic Efficacy , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  V. Ntziachristos,et al.  Molecular imaging by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT). , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[25]  Konstantin V Sokolov,et al.  Intravascular Photoacoustic Imaging , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[26]  T. Hasan,et al.  Targeted photodynamic therapy , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[27]  Tae-Jong Yoon,et al.  Recent advances in photoacoustic endoscopy. , 2013, World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[28]  Zhe Wang,et al.  Photosensitizer-loaded gold vesicles with strong plasmonic coupling effect for imaging-guided photothermal/photodynamic therapy. , 2013, ACS nano.

[29]  T. Hasan,et al.  Phase I/II study of verteporfin photodynamic therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  Shai Ashkenazi,et al.  Photoacoustic lifetime imaging of dissolved oxygen using methylene blue. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[31]  Minoru Obara,et al.  In Vivo Photoacoustic Monitoring of Photosensitizer Distribution in Burned Skin for Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy , 2010, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[32]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Methylene blue microbubbles as a model dual-modality contrast agent for ultrasound and activatable photoacoustic imaging , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[33]  Michael Weller,et al.  Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma--are we there yet? , 2013, Neuro-oncology.

[34]  J. Willmann,et al.  Multiparametric Spectroscopic Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer Development in a Transgenic Mouse Model , 2014, Theranostics.

[35]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Porphysome nanovesicles generated by porphyrin bilayers for use as multimodal biophotonic contrast agents. , 2011, Nature materials.

[36]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Development and applications of photo-triggered theranostic agents. , 2010, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[37]  F. M. van den Engh,et al.  Visualizing breast cancer using the Twente photoacoustic mammoscope: what do we learn from twelve new patient measurements? , 2012, Optics express.

[38]  B. Henderson,et al.  Reduction of tumour oxygenation during and after photodynamic therapy in vivo: effects of fluence rate. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[39]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Analysis of sampling volume and tissue heterogeneity on the in vivo detection of fluorescence. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[40]  R. J. Hodgkiss,et al.  Vascular perfusion and hypoxic areas in RIF-1 tumours after photodynamic therapy. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[41]  Stephen Chad Kanick,et al.  Optical Spectroscopy to Guide Photodynamic Therapy of Head and Neck Tumors , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[42]  Guoqiang Yu,et al.  Tumor vascular microenvironment determines responsiveness to photodynamic therapy. , 2012, Cancer research.

[43]  Moustapha Hassan,et al.  Real-Time Assessment of Tissue Hypoxia In Vivo with Combined Photoacoustics and High-Frequency Ultrasound , 2014, Theranostics.

[44]  L. Gossner,et al.  Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus , 2008, Gut.

[45]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Surrogates of Tumor Response to Therapy: Anatomic and Functional Biomarkers* , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  T. Hasan,et al.  Verteporfin‐based photodynamic therapy overcomes gemcitabine insensitivity in a panel of pancreatic cancer cell lines , 2011, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[47]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[48]  T. Osaki,et al.  Antitumor effects and blood flow dynamics after photodynamic therapy using benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A in KLN205 and LM8 mouse tumor models. , 2007, Cancer letters.

[49]  Michal Neeman,et al.  Monitoring photodynamic therapy of solid tumors online by BOLD-contrast MRI , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[50]  Zhe Wang,et al.  Photosensitizer-conjugated silica-coated gold nanoclusters for fluorescence imaging-guided photodynamic therapy. , 2013, Biomaterials.