Encountering Productive Forms of Complexity in Learning Modern Physics

This paper aims at supporting the claim that some forms of hyper-simplification, by making physics seem easy, are at risk of dangerously distorting the content as well as the process of learning physics. The paper presents examples of dangerous simplifications in the teaching of quantum physics. Then, examples of productive forms of complexity are discussed, both as criteria for designing teaching proposals, and for realizing appropriate learning environments, namely properly complex territories. Empirical results, from a teaching/learning experiment on quantum physics at upper secondary school (grade 13), are reported. These results show examples of students’ reactions to travelling through a complex territory, and allow us to argue that unavoidable difficulty in learning quantum physics can be transformed into cultural challenges within reach of secondary school students.

[1]  Azam Mashhadi,et al.  Students’ Conceptions of Quantum Physics , 1995 .

[2]  W. Gerlāch,et al.  Der experimentelle Nachweis der Richtungsquantelung im Magnetfeld , 1922 .

[3]  Olivia Levrini The Substantivalist View of Spacetime Proposed by Minkowski and Its Educational Implications , 2002, Science & Education.

[4]  Barbara Pecori,et al.  Forms of Productive Complexity as Criteria for Educational Reconstruction: The Design of a Teaching Proposal on Thermodynamics , 2014 .

[5]  Barbara Pecori,et al.  A longitudinal approach to appropriation of science ideas: a study of students' trajectories in thermodynamics , 2010, ICLS.

[6]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  How Students Learn from Multiple Contexts and Definitions: Proper Time as a Coordination Class. , 2008 .

[7]  George Kalkanis,et al.  An Instructional Model for a Radical Conceptual Change Towards Quantum Mechanics Concepts , 2003 .

[8]  Pandora Hadzidaki The Heisenberg Microscope: A Powerful Instructional Tool for Promoting Meta-Cognitive and Meta-Scientific Thinking on Quantum Mechanics and the ‚Nature of Science’ , 2008 .

[9]  A Miller Visualization Lost and Regained: The Genesis of the Quantum Theory , 1997 .

[10]  M. Minsky The Society of Mind , 1986 .

[11]  H. D. Regt Erwin Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and quantum theory , 1997 .

[12]  A. Garritz Teaching the Philosophical Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Chemistry Through Controversies , 2013 .

[13]  Gren Ireson,et al.  On the quantum thinking of physics undergraduates , 2001 .

[14]  Olivia Levrini The Role of History and Philosophy in Research on Teaching and Learning of Relativity , 2014 .

[15]  Orit Parnafes When Simple Harmonic Motion is not That Simple: Managing Epistemological Complexity by Using Computer-based Representations , 2010 .

[16]  Edgar W. Jenkins,et al.  Innovations in science and technology education , 1986 .

[17]  Svein Sjøberg SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION: CURRENT CHALLENGES AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS , 2019 .

[18]  Philosophy and Quantum Mechanics in Science Teaching , 2003 .

[19]  Thomas Henry Huxley,et al.  Science and Education , 2003 .

[20]  Judith Wechsler,et al.  On Aesthetics in Science , 1980 .

[21]  G. Pospiech Uncertainty and complementarity: the heart of quantum physics , 2000 .