Global-scale coordinated networks as a tool for exploring the functioning of stream ecosystems

Individual ecological studies, although suitable for testing hypotheses and developing theory, provide site-or region-specific information that is difficult to extrapolate to provide broad generalizations. Today, emerging globally relevant questions (e.g., climate change, biodiversity loss, invasive species or habitat degradation) require a reconsideration of what approaches would be best for understanding large-scale ecological patterns and processes. A technique commonly used for this purpose is metaanalysis, a quantitative approach to reviewing, integrating, and summarizing large numbers of independent studies. However, the robustness of a meta-Analysis relies on the individual studies selected for inclusion, and issues of scale and methodology cannot be controlled retrospectively. An emerging, alternative approach is global-scale coordinated experiments, run in parallel by several research groups in multiple locations around the globe. These experiments have the advantage of addressing global problems and exploring general ecological theory, while offering the precision of controlled experiments. Here we review the existing global-scale experiments conducted by stream ecologists and discuss the potential of this type of study for developing ecological theory and advancing our understanding of stream ecosystem functioning.

[1]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  RESOLVING ECOLOGICAL QUESTIONS THROUGH META‐ANALYSIS: GOALS, METRICS, AND MODELS , 1999 .

[2]  David Dudgeon,et al.  A global experiment suggests climate warming will not accelerate litter decomposition in streams but might reduce carbon sequestration. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[3]  R. Pearson,et al.  Local Variation in Shredder Distribution can Explain their Oversight in Tropical Streams , 2009 .

[4]  S. Levin THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[5]  N. Griffiths,et al.  A standardized cotton-strip assay for measuring organic-matter decomposition in streams , 2013 .

[6]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[7]  R. Pearson,et al.  Food webs in tropical Australian streams: shredders are not scarce , 2005 .

[8]  R. Pearson,et al.  Gradients in regional diversity of freshwater taxa , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[10]  R. Aerts,et al.  Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes , 2014, Nature.

[11]  C. Hui,et al.  Latitudinal gradient of nestedness and its potential drivers in stream detritivores , 2015 .

[12]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[13]  R. Pearson,et al.  Standing crop and processing of rainforest litter in a tropical Australian stream , 1989, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[14]  M. Dobson,et al.  Detritivores in Kenyan highland streams: more evidence for the paucity of shredders in the tropics? , 2002 .

[15]  Brendan G. McKie,et al.  Continental-Scale Effects of Nutrient Pollution on Stream Ecosystem Functioning , 2012, Science.

[16]  H. Shaffer,et al.  Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics , 2003 .

[17]  M. Graça,et al.  Eucalyptus plantations affect fungal communities associated with leaf-litter decomposition in Iberian streams , 2006 .

[18]  É. Chauvet,et al.  Breakdown of leaf litter in a neotropical stream , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  Brian G. Wolff,et al.  Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change , 2001, Science.

[20]  Roy Turkington,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Coordinated distributed experiments : an emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science , 2012 .

[21]  W. Parton,et al.  Long‐term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition , 2000 .

[22]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[23]  C. Pringle,et al.  Latitudinal patterns in leaf litter breakdown: is temperature really important? , 1994 .

[24]  N. K. Kaushik,et al.  fate of the dead leaves that fall into streams , 1971 .

[25]  G. Woodward,et al.  Litter Decomposition as an Indicator of Stream Ecosystem Functioning at Local-to-Continental Scales: Insights from the European RivFunction Project , 2016 .

[26]  J. Meyer,et al.  Multiple Trophic Levels of a Forest Stream Linked to Terrestrial Litter Inputs , 1997 .

[27]  F. O. Howard,et al.  The Utilization of Leaf Litter by Stream Detritivores , 1973 .

[28]  Cang Hui,et al.  Biotic and abiotic variables influencing plant litter breakdown in streams: a global study , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Peter B. Adler,et al.  Finding generality in ecology: a model for globally distributed experiments , 2014 .

[30]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Broad‐scale geographical patterns in local stream insect genera richness , 2003 .

[31]  L. Barmuta,et al.  Global patterns of stream detritivore distribution: implications for biodiversity loss in changing climates , 2012 .

[32]  G. Woodward,et al.  Stream ecosystem functioning in an agricultural landscape: The importance of terrestrial-aquatic linkages , 2011 .

[33]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.