Zero weights and non-zero slacks: Different solutions to the same problem

This paper re-assesses three independently developed approaches that are aimed at solving the problem of zero-weights or non-zero slacks in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The methods are weights restricted, non-radial and extended facet DEA models. Weights restricted DEA models are dual to envelopment DEA models with restrictions on the dual variables (DEA weights) aimed at avoiding zero values for those weights; non-radial DEA models are envelopment models which avoid non-zero slacks in the input-output constraints. Finally, extended facet DEA models recognize that only projections on facets of full dimension correspond to well defined rates of substitution/transformation between all inputs/outputs which in turn correspond to non-zero weights in the multiplier version of the DEA model. We demonstrate how these methods are equivalent, not only in their aim but also in the solutions they yield. In addition, we show that the aforementioned methods modify the production frontier by extending existing facets or creating unobserved facets. Further we propose a new approach that uses weight restrictions to extend existing facets. This approach has some advantages in computational terms, because extended facet models normally make use of mixed integer programming models, which are computationally demanding.

[1]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Tarmo Räty Efficient Facet Based Efficiency Index: A Variable Returns to Scale Specification , 2002 .

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in data development analysis , 1986 .

[4]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Identification and Use of Efficient Faces and Facets in DEA , 2003 .

[5]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Efficiency bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[7]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Measures of inefficiency in data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier estimation , 1997 .

[8]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[9]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  AN e-FREE DEA AND A NEW· MEASURE OF EFFICIENCY , 1993 .

[10]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies , 2003 .

[11]  P. S. Dharmapala,et al.  Linked-cone DEA profit ratios and technical efficiency with application to Illinois coal mines , 1995 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances , 1997 .

[13]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[14]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The measurement of productive efficiency : techniques and applications , 1993 .

[15]  Pascal Lang,et al.  Controlled Envelopment by Face Extension in DEA , 1995 .

[16]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Simulating Weights Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unobserved Dmus , 1998 .

[17]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[18]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[19]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[21]  William W. Cooper,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION: MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION MAKING UNITS , 1979 .

[22]  A. Bessent,et al.  Efficiency Frontier Determination by Constrained Facet Analysis , 1988, Oper. Res..

[23]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[25]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis:the mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis , 2008 .

[26]  Ole Bent Olesen,et al.  Indicators of ill-conditioned data sets and model misspecification in data envelopment analysis: an extended facet approach , 1996 .

[27]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[28]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Incorporating Value Judgments in DEA , 2004 .

[29]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[30]  Joe Zhu Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure , 1996 .

[31]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..