Towards Tunable Consensus Clustering for Studying Functional Brain Connectivity During Affective Processing

In the past decades, neuroimaging of humans has gained a position of status within neuroscience, and data-driven approaches and functional connectivity analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are increasingly favored to depict the complex architecture of human brains. However, the reliability of these findings is jeopardized by too many analysis methods and sometimes too few samples used, which leads to discord among researchers. We propose a tunable consensus clustering paradigm that aims at overcoming the clustering methods selection problem as well as reliability issues in neuroimaging by means of first applying several analysis methods (three in this study) on multiple datasets and then integrating the clustering results. To validate the method, we applied it to a complex fMRI experiment involving affective processing of hundreds of music clips. We found that brain structures related to visual, reward, and auditory processing have intrinsic spatial patterns of coherent neuroactivity during affective processing. The comparisons between the results obtained from our method and those from each individual clustering algorithm demonstrate that our paradigm has notable advantages over traditional single clustering algorithms in being able to evidence robust connectivity patterns even with complex neuroimaging data involving a variety of stimuli and affective evaluations of them. The consensus clustering method is implemented in the R package "UNCLES" available on http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/UNCLES/index.html .

[1]  H. Pashler,et al.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[2]  Michael Lifshitz,et al.  Empirical neuroenchantment: from reading minds to thinking critically , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Causal reasoning with forces , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[5]  C. Windischberger,et al.  Quantification in functional magnetic resonance imaging: fuzzy clustering vs. correlation analysis. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  Li Dong,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Musical Training and Functional Plasticity in Salience System , 2014, Neural plasticity.

[7]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Interactions Between the Nucleus Accumbens and Auditory Cortices Predict Music Reward Value , 2013, Science.

[8]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Neural Interactions That Give Rise to Musical Pleasure , 2013 .

[9]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  On Clustering fMRI Time Series , 1999, NeuroImage.

[10]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[11]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[13]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Functional centrality of amygdala, striatum and hypothalamus in a “small‐world” network underlying joy: An fMRI study with music , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[15]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  A Functional MRI Study of Happy and Sad Emotions in Music with and without Lyrics , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[16]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Functional community analysis of brain: A new approach for EEG-based investigation of the brain pathology , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Vision Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural , 2011 .

[18]  Suvi Saarikallio,et al.  Affective reactions to musical stimuli reflect emotional use of music in everyday life , 2013 .

[19]  Brain imaging studies under fire , 2009, Nature.

[20]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Vinoo Alluri,et al.  Musical Expertise Modulates Functional Connectivity of Limbic Regions during Continuous Music Listening , 2015 .

[22]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  It's Sad but I Like It: The Neural Dissociation Between Musical Emotions and Liking in Experts and Laypersons , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  L. Shah,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Seminars in roentgenology.

[24]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Toward a Neural Chronometry for the Aesthetic Experience of Music , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[26]  Steven C. R. Williams,et al.  A functional MRI study of happy and sad affective states induced by classical music , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[27]  A. Friederici,et al.  Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Yinghuan Shi,et al.  Xcsc: a Novel Approach to Clustering with Extended Classifier System , 2011, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[29]  H. Adeli,et al.  Complexity of functional connectivity networks in mild cognitive impairment subjects during a working memory task , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  H. Adeli,et al.  Graph Theoretical Analysis of Organization of Functional Brain Networks in ADHD , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[31]  S. Koelsch Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  M. Steen,et al.  Network Science and the Effects of Music Preference on Functional Brain Connectivity: From Beethoven to Eminem , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[33]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[34]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  The Structure of Emotion , 2006 .

[35]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  On the Definition of Signal-To-Noise Ratio and Contrast-To-Noise Ratio for fMRI Data , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  A. Nandi,et al.  Paradigm of Tunable Clustering Using Binarization of Consensus Partition Matrices (Bi-CoPaM) for Gene Discovery , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Everything You Never Wanted to Know about Circular Analysis, but Were Afraid to Ask , 2010, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[38]  E. Brattico,et al.  Neuroplasticity beyond Sounds: Neural Adaptations Following Long-Term Musical Aesthetic Experiences , 2015, Brain sciences.

[39]  A. Damasio,et al.  Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Hamidah Ibrahim,et al.  A Survey: Clustering Ensembles Techniques , 2009 .

[41]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Amygdala damage impairs emotion recognition from music , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Scott J Peltier,et al.  Detecting low‐frequency functional connectivity in fMRI using a self‐organizing map (SOM) algorithm , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[43]  N. Volkow,et al.  Abnormal Functional Connectivity in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[44]  C. Liégeois-Chauvel,et al.  Brain regions involved in the recognition of happiness and sadness in music , 2005, Neuroreport.

[45]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  The general linear model and fMRI: Does love last forever? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[46]  S. Koelsch Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[47]  David Camacho,et al.  Adaptive k-Means Algorithm for Overlapped Graph Clustering , 2012, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[48]  E G Jones,et al.  Assessing the Decade of the Brain , 1999, Science.

[49]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Early neuronal responses in right limbic structures mediate harmony incongruity processing in musical experts , 2008, NeuroImage.

[50]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[51]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Enhanced probabilistic neural network with local decision circles: A robust classifier , 2010, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[52]  T. Warren Liao,et al.  Clustering of time series data - a survey , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[53]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[54]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[55]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Large-scale brain networks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm , 2012, NeuroImage.

[56]  Tapani Ristaniemi,et al.  Semi-blind independent component analysis of functional MRI elicited by continuous listening to music , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[57]  Fred L. Steinberg,et al.  Dynamic Emotional and Neural Responses to Music Depend on Performance Expression and Listener Experience , 2010, PloS one.

[58]  Christof Karmonik,et al.  Graph theoretical connectivity analysis of the human brain while listening to music with emotional attachment: Feasibility study , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).