Structural and practical identifiability of approximate metabolic network models

Parameter estimation from experimental data is a crucial problem in quantitative modeling of biochemical reaction networks. An especially important issue, raised by the complexity of the models and the challenging nature of the experimental data, is parameter identifiability. Despite several approaches proposed in the systems biology literature, no agreement exists on the analysis of structural and practical identifiability, and the relations among the two. In this paper we propose a mathematical framework for the analysis of identifiability of metabolic network models, establish basic results and methods for the structural and practical identifiability analysis of the class of so-called linlog models, and discuss the results on the basis of an artificial example.

[1]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Dynamic simulation and metabolic re-design of a branched pathway using linlog kinetics. , 2003, Metabolic engineering.

[2]  Maksat Ashyraliyev,et al.  Systems biology: parameter estimation for biochemical models , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[3]  J. Bailey,et al.  Effects of spatiotemporal variations on metabolic control: approximate analysis using (log)linear kinetic models. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[5]  E. Crampin SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION CHALLENGES FROM SYSTEMS BIOLOGY , 2006 .

[6]  Pei Yee Ho,et al.  Multiple High-Throughput Analyses Monitor the Response of E. coli to Perturbations , 2007, Science.

[7]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood , 2009, Bioinform..

[8]  K. F. Tipton,et al.  Biochemical systems analysis: A study of function and design in molecular biology , 1978 .

[9]  I. E. Nikerel,et al.  Model reduction and a priori kinetic parameter identifiability analysis using metabolome time series for metabolic reaction networks with linlog kinetics. , 2009, Metabolic engineering.

[10]  T. Rothenberg Identification in Parametric Models , 1971 .

[11]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[12]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[13]  Eugenio Cinquemani,et al.  Identification of metabolic network models from incomplete high-throughput datasets , 2011, Bioinform..

[14]  J. Heijnen Approximative kinetic formats used in metabolic network modeling , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  J. Liao,et al.  Metabolic control analysis using transient metabolite concentrations. Determination of metabolite concentration control coefficients. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  E. Klipp,et al.  Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints , 2006, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[17]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..