Design Architecture: An Introduction and Overview

Digital libraries evolved in response to the need to manage the vast quantities of electronic information that we produce, collect, and consume. Architects of such systems have adopted a variety of design approaches, which are summarized and illustrated in this chapter. We also introduce the following three chapters, and provide suitable background. From a historical perspective, we note that early systems were designed independently to afford services to specific communities. Since then, systems that store and mediate access to information have become commonplace and are scattered all over the Internet. Consequently, information retrieval also has to contend with distributed/networked systems, in a transparent and scalable fashion. In this context, digital library architects have adopted various interoperability standards and practices to provide users with seamless access to highly distributed information sources. This chapter looks at current research and emerging best practices adopted in designing digital libraries, whether individual or distributed.

[1]  Michael Breu,et al.  Digital Libraries in Computer Science: The MeDoc Approach , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Luis Gravano,et al.  The Stanford InfoBus and Its Service Layers: Augmenting the Internet with High-Level Information Management Protocols , 1998, The MeDoc Approach.

[3]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  A Spectrum of Interoperability: The Site for Science Prototype for the NSDL , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[4]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) , 2004 .

[5]  Louis M. Gomez,et al.  Formative design evaluation of superbook , 1989, TOIS.

[6]  Kurt Maly,et al.  Kepler - An OAI Data/Service Provider for the Individual , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[7]  Sandra Payette,et al.  Interoperability for Digital Objects and Repositories: The Cornell/CNRI Experiments , 1999, D Lib Mag..

[8]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  Dienst: an architecture for distributed document libraries , 1995, CACM.

[9]  安藤 一秋,et al.  Google Web APIs を利用した英文作成支援ツール , 2006 .

[10]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  The open archives initiative , 2001 .

[11]  Leonid Kalinichenko,et al.  Analytical survey: Digital libraries in education , 2003 .

[12]  Jean Jacques Moreau,et al.  SOAP Version 1. 2 Part 1: Messaging Framework , 2003 .

[13]  Thomas Krichel,et al.  Working towards an Open Library for Economics : The RePEc project ∗ 2000 – 03 – 24 , 2000 .

[14]  A. Kravtsova,et al.  UNESCO INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN EDUCATION , 1904 .

[15]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  Open Archives Initiative - Protocol for Metadata Harvesting - v.2.0 , 2002 .

[16]  Douglas Cunliffe Daniel Tudhope,et al.  The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia , 1995 .

[17]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  NCSTRL: Design and deployment of a globally distributed digital library , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  A Framework for Building Open Digital Libraries , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[19]  Vanda Broughton,et al.  Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment; the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures , 2001, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[20]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The Intellectual Property Rights Issues Facing Self-archiving: Key Findings of the RoMEO Project , 2003, D Lib Mag..

[21]  Mark Needleman ZING—Z39.50 International: Next Generation , 2002 .

[22]  Erik Christensen,et al.  WSDL: Web Service Description Language , 2001 .

[23]  Organización Internacional de Normalización ISO 23950 : Information and documentation -- Information retrieval (Z39.50) -- Application service definition and protocol specification , 1998 .

[24]  Kurt Maly,et al.  Arc: an OAI service provider for cross-archive searching , 2001, JCDL '01.

[25]  Paul Ginsparg,et al.  Can Peer Review Be Better Focused? , 2002 .