Principle ERP reduction and analysis: Estimating and using principle ERP waveforms underlying ERPs across tasks, subjects and electrodes

Event-related potentials (ERP) waveforms are the summation of many overlapping signals. Changes in the peak or mean amplitude of a waveform over a given time period, therefore, cannot reliably be attributed to a particular ERP component of ex ante interest, as is the standard approach to ERP analysis. Though this problem is widely recognized, it is not well addressed in practice. Our approach begins by presuming that any observed ERP waveform - at any electrode, for any trial type, and for any participant - is approximately a weighted combination of signals from an underlying set of what we refer to as principle ERPs, or pERPs. We propose an accessible approach to analyzing complete ERP waveforms in terms of their underlying pERPs. First, we propose the principle ERP reduction (pERP-RED) algorithm for investigators to estimate a suitable set of pERPs from their data, which may span multiple tasks. Next, we provide tools and illustrations of pERP-space analysis, whereby observed ERPs are decomposed into the amplitudes of the contributing pERPs, which can be contrasted across conditions or groups to reveal which pERPs differ (substantively and/or significantly) between conditions/groups. Differences on all pERPs can be reported together rather than selectively, providing complete information on all components in the waveform, thereby avoiding selective reporting or user discretion regarding the choice of which components or windows to use. The scalp distribution of each pERP can also be plotted for any group/condition. We demonstrate this suite of tools through simulations and on real data collected from multiple experiments on participants diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Software for conducting these analyses is provided in the pERPred package for R.

[1]  René J. Huster,et al.  A Tutorial Review on Multi-subject Decomposition of EEG , 2017, Brain Topography.

[2]  Damla Sentürk,et al.  Hybrid principal components analysis for region-referenced longitudinal functional EEG data. , 2018, Biostatistics.

[3]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.

[4]  W. Ziegler The Oxford Handbook Of Event Related Potential Components , 2016 .

[5]  E. Donchin,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Modeling the Evolution of Dynamic Brain Processes During an Associative Learning Experiment , 2016 .

[7]  B. Caffo,et al.  MULTILEVEL FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS. , 2009, The annals of applied statistics.

[8]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  Andrei Zinovyev,et al.  Determining the optimal number of independent components for reproducible transcriptomic data analysis , 2017, BMC Genomics.

[11]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  EEGIFT: Group Independent Component Analysis for Event-Related EEG Data , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[12]  S. Luck An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[13]  A. Cichocki,et al.  alidating rationale of group-level component analysis based on estimating umber of sources in EEG through model order selection , 2012 .

[14]  S. Greven,et al.  Multivariate Functional Principal Component Analysis for Data Observed on Different (Dimensional) Domains , 2015, 1509.02029.

[15]  Kevin McEvoy,et al.  Identifying longitudinal trends within EEG experiments , 2015, Biometrics.

[16]  J. McGough,et al.  Alpha modulation during working memory encoding predicts neurocognitive impairment in ADHD. , 2019, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[17]  Ciprian M Crainiceanu,et al.  Structured functional principal component analysis , 2013, Biometrics.

[18]  Kehui Chen,et al.  Localized Functional Principal Component Analysis , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[19]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  S. Jeste,et al.  ERP evidence of semantic processing in children with ASD , 2019, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Charlotte DiStefano,et al.  A multi‐dimensional functional principal components analysis of EEG data , 2017, Biometrics.

[22]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Interpretable Principal Components Analysis for Multilevel Multivariate Functional Data, with Application to EEG Experiments , 2019, 1909.08024.

[23]  Chee-Ming Ting,et al.  Statistical models for brain signals with properties that evolve across trials , 2017, NeuroImage.