The Grammaticalization of Small Size Nouns

This article discusses the grammaticalized status of low-frequency small size nouns (henceforth SSNs), such as jot of, scrap of, and flicker of, which cannot have engaged in the spiral routinization processes with attrition, decategorialization, and grammatical reanalysis characteristic of “default” grammaticalization. The proposal to account for the grammatical status of low-frequency complex prepositions in terms of grammaticalization by analogy is partially rejected. Corpus studies on nine SSNs show that mere analogy with one highly schematic construction, a+SSN+of, as instantiated by frequent a bit of, cannot be the sole factor involved in the grammaticalization of infrequent SSNs. Instead, more complex analogies with different quantifier models are involved which incorporate polarity sensitivity, similar to some and any, and which seem to serve as distant models in these analogies. However, in contrast to some and any, which can be used generally in quantifying contexts, the infrequent SSNs are further characterized by specific collocational and pragmatic values, and their appearance seems restricted to particular discourse contexts. More generally, the present article supports the claim that grammaticalization as such directly works on and results in (at least partially) substantive constructions, rather than schematic ones. It furthermore makes a claim for caution in describing what serves as a source for analogical extension, both in terms of describing all of the factors that come into play and deciding on the specific level of schematicity at which these need to be described.

[1]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[2]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[3]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[4]  Sebastian Hoffmann Are Low-Frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized? On the Limits of Corpus Data - and the Importance of Intuition. , 2004 .

[5]  W. Louw Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? — The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies , 1993 .

[6]  J. Haiman Ritualization and the development of language , 1994 .

[7]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[8]  Lieselotte Brems Measure Noun constructions : an instance of semantically-driven grammaticalization , 2003 .

[9]  M. Israel The Pragmatics of Polarity , 2004 .

[10]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization , 2004 .

[11]  B. Heine,et al.  Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework , 1991 .

[12]  Jean-Christophe Verstraete,et al.  Coming to terms with subjectivity , 2006 .

[13]  E. Traugott Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization , 1988 .

[14]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency , 2008 .

[15]  Christian Kay,et al.  The Oxford English Dictionary Online , 2004, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[16]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[17]  Walter Bisang,et al.  Lexicalisation and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? , 2004 .

[18]  D. Geeraerts Vagueness's puzzles, polysemy's vagaries , 1993 .

[19]  M. Israel Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics , 1996 .

[20]  D. Sperber,et al.  Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction , 1981 .

[21]  David Crystal,et al.  A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics , 1997 .

[22]  A dictionary of grammaticalization , 1994 .

[23]  E. Traugott Constructions in Grammaticalization , 2008 .