Frequency selectivity of hearing in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea

Summary1.Frequency selectivity of hearing was measured in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea. A psychophysical technique based on reflex modification was used to obtain masked threshold estimates for pure tones (300–5,400 Hz) presented against two levels of broadband masking noise. A pure tone (S-1) presented 200 ms prior to a reflex-eliciting stimulus (S-2) inhibited the motor reflex response to S-2. The magnitude of this reflex modification effect varied systematically with the sound pressure level (SPL) of S-1, and threshold was defined as the SPL of S-1 at which the reflex modification effect disappeared.2.Masked thresholds were used to calculate critical ratios, an index of the auditory system's frequency selectivity. The frequency selectivity of the treefrog's hearing is greatest and critical ratios are lowest (22–24 dB) at about 900 and 3,000 Hz, the two spectral regions dominant in the male treefrog's species-specific advertisement call. These results suggest that the treefrog's auditory system may be specialized to reject noise at biologically relevant frequencies.3.As in other vertebrates, critical ratios remain constant when background noise level is varied; however, the shape of the treefrog's critical ratio function across frequencies differs from the typical vertebrate function that increases with increasing frequency at a slope of about 3 dB/octave. Instead, the treefrog's critical ratio function resembles its pure tone audiogram. Although the shape of the treefrog's critical ratio function is atypical, the critical ratio values themselves are comparable to those of many other vertebrates in the same frequency range.4.Critical ratio values here measured behaviorally do not match critical ratio values previously measured physiologically in single eighth nerve fibers. This suggests that frequency selectivity of hearing in the green treefrog is mediated in the central, rather than the peripheral, auditory system and probably does not arise directly from the tuning of the individual auditory nerve fibers.

[1]  C. Moss,et al.  Behavioral audiograms of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) and the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  A S Feng,et al.  Directional characteristics of the acoustic receiver of the leopard frog (Rana pipiens): a study of eighth nerve auditory responses. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R. Fay Masking of tones by noise for the goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  C. M. Bogert The influence of sound on the behavior of amphibians and reptiles. , 1962 .

[5]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Nonlinear Properties of the Peripheral Auditory System of Anurans , 1980 .

[6]  R. Fay,et al.  Phase-locking in goldfish saccular nerve fibres accounts for frequency discrimination capacities , 1978, Nature.

[7]  Broadband masking noise and behavioral pure tone thresholds in cats. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Neural mechanisms in sound detection and temporal summation , 1983, Hearing Research.

[9]  G. Gourevitch AUDITORY MASKING IN THE RAT. , 1965, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  L. Fechter,et al.  Reflex inhibition procedures for animal audiometry: a technique for assessing ototoxicity. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Liberman The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Effects of masking noise on evoked calling in the Puerto Rican coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[13]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) to synthetic mating calls , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .

[15]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Critical Band Width in Loudness Summation , 1957 .

[16]  Edwin R. Lewis,et al.  The tonotopic organization of the bullfrog amphibian papilla, an auditory organ lacking a basilar membrane , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Auditory midbrain responses parallel spectral integration phenomena. , 1985, Science.

[18]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Morphology and Physiology of the Auditory System , 1976 .

[19]  R. Denny,et al.  Critical bands in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus) , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[20]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Masking patterns and filter characteristics of auditory nerve fibers in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[21]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens, and vocalizations. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[23]  W. F. Blair Acoustic behaviour of Amphibia , 1963 .

[24]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Sound Communication in Anurans , 1983 .

[25]  A. Hawkins,et al.  Masked auditory thresholds in the cod,Gadus morhua L. , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  P. Narins,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for a traveling wave in the amphibian inner ear. , 1984, Science.

[27]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Masked auditory thresholds, critical ratios, and scales of the basilar membrane of the housemouse (Mus musculus) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[28]  James D. Miller Auditory Sensitivity of the Chinchilla in Quiet and in Noise , 1964 .

[29]  R. Capranica,et al.  Place mechanism underlying frequency analysis in the toad's inner ear , 1977 .

[30]  J. Pickles,et al.  Normal critical bands in the cat. , 1975, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[31]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Reflex modification in the domain of startle: I. Some empirical findings and their implications for how the nervous system processes sensory input. , 1980, Psychological review.

[32]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Masking of Tones by Noise for the Cat , 1959 .

[33]  J O Pickles,et al.  Auditory-nerve-fiber bandwidths and critical bandwidths in the cat. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Glenis R. Long,et al.  Masked auditory thresholds from the bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[35]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .