Simulation Study of Low-Dose Sparse-Sampling CT with Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction: Usefulness for Evaluation of Ovarian Cancer Metastasis

The usefulness of sparse-sampling CT with deep learning-based reconstruction for detection of metastasis of malignant ovarian tumors was evaluated. We obtained contrast-enhanced CT images (n = 141) of ovarian cancers from a public database, whose images were randomly divided into 71 training, 20 validation, and 50 test cases. Sparse-sampling CT images were calculated slice-by-slice by software simulation. Two deep-learning models for deep learning-based reconstruction were evaluated: Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network (RED-CNN) and deeper U-net. For 50 test cases, we evaluated the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) as quantitative measures. Two radiologists independently performed a qualitative evaluation for the following points: entire CT image quality; visibility of the iliac artery; and visibility of peritoneal dissemination, liver metastasis, and lymph node metastasis. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used to compare image quality and metastasis detectability between the two models, respectively. The mean PSNR and SSIM performed better with deeper U-net over RED-CNN. For all items of the visual evaluation, deeper U-net scored significantly better than RED-CNN. The metastasis detectability with deeper U-net was more than 95%. Sparse-sampling CT with deep learning-based reconstruction proved useful in detecting metastasis of malignant ovarian tumors and might contribute to reducing overall CT-radiation exposure.

[1]  Jaime Prat,et al.  2014 FIGO staging for ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Deep Learning-based CT Image Reconstruction: Initial Evaluation Targeting Hypovascular Hepatic Metastases. , 2019, Radiology. Artificial intelligence.

[3]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Generative Adversarial Networks for Noise Reduction in Low-Dose CT , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  S. Jordan,et al.  Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2017, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[5]  Mizuho Nishio,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks with a Deeper U-Net for Sparse-View Computed Tomography Reconstruction. , 2020, Academic radiology.

[6]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Mizuho Nishio,et al.  Convolutional auto-encoder for image denoising of ultra-low-dose CT , 2017, Heliyon.

[10]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Fast and flexible X-ray tomography using the ASTRA toolbox. , 2016, Optics express.

[11]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Cycle‐consistent adversarial denoising network for multiphase coronary CT angiography , 2018, Medical physics.

[12]  Soo Yeol Lee,et al.  Bone-induced streak artifact suppression in sparse-view CT image reconstruction , 2012, Biomedical engineering online.

[13]  Caihong Xia,et al.  Ovarian Yolk Sac Tumors; Does Age Matter? , 2017, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[14]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Framing U-Net via Deep Convolutional Framelets: Application to Sparse-View CT , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low‐dose X‐ray CT reconstruction , 2016, Medical physics.

[16]  Kai Mei,et al.  Multidetector Computed Tomography Imaging: Effect of Sparse Sampling and Iterative Reconstruction on Trabecular Bone Microstructure , 2018, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT , 2019, European Radiology.

[18]  Sinae Kim,et al.  Exposure to Tomographic Scans and Cancer Risks , 2019, JNCI cancer spectrum.

[19]  E. Sala,et al.  Ovarian carcinomatosis: how the radiologist can help plan the surgical approach. , 2012, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[20]  Michael Unser,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Yochai Blau,et al.  The Perception-Distortion Tradeoff , 2017, CVPR.

[22]  Jacobus Pfisterer,et al.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials , 2009, Cancer.

[23]  Feng Lin,et al.  Low-Dose CT With a Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Hys Ngan,et al.  Carcinoma of the Ovary , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[25]  Mannudeep K. Kalra,et al.  Low-Dose CT with a Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network (RED-CNN) , 2017, ArXiv.

[26]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  The ASTRA Toolbox: A platform for advanced algorithm development in electron tomography. , 2015, Ultramicroscopy.

[28]  P. Noël,et al.  The evolution of image reconstruction for CT—from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence , 2018, European radiology.

[29]  D M Parkin,et al.  Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods , 2018, International journal of cancer.

[30]  K. Awai,et al.  Deep learning–based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography , 2019, European Radiology.