Is there a northern Lesser Antilles forearc block?

A systematic discrepancy exists between slip vectors of thrust fault earthquakes at the Lesser Antilles trench (LAT) and the predicted direction of North American‐Caribbean convergence. A possibility has been that the discrepancy resulted because neither was well constrained. Estimating Caribbean motion has been challenging owing to the limited data along the plate's complex boundaries. Similarly, earlier studies had few slip vectors because interplate thrust events are infrequent. To address these difficulties, we estimate a new Caribbean‐North America Euler vector using recently available GPS data from sites in the presumably stable interior of the Caribbean, and compare the predicted velocities to a larger set of slip vectors. The discrepancy persists, suggesting the northern Lesser Antilles forearc (NLAF) moves as a distinct entity from both the Caribbean and North America. For simplicity, we treat its motion as a coherent block, but because GPS sites are not within the NLAF, distributed deformation is also possible. Although there is no geologic evidence for the boundaries of the presumed NLAF block, GPS data show that the motions of Martinique, Barbados, and Trinidad are similar to that of the Caribbean, suggesting that none are on the NLAF block, and the southern LAT is weakly coupled.

[1]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  IGS reference frames: status and future improvements , 2004 .

[2]  A. John Haines,et al.  An integrated global model of present‐day plate motions and plate boundary deformation , 2003 .

[3]  Jean-Bernard Minster,et al.  Detection of ionospheric perturbations using a dense GPS array in Southern California , 2003 .

[4]  Paul Mann,et al.  Oblique collision in the northeastern Caribbean from GPS measurements and geological observations , 2002 .

[5]  P. Tapponnier,et al.  Arc parallel extension and localization of volcanic complexes in Guadeloupe, Lesser Antilles , 2002 .

[6]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  REVEL: A model for Recent plate velocities from space geodesy , 2002 .

[7]  T. Dixon,et al.  GPS geodetic constraints on Caribbean‐North America Plate Motion , 2000 .

[8]  T. Dixon,et al.  Noise in GPS coordinate time series , 1999 .

[9]  N. Driscoll,et al.  Deformation of the Caribbean region: One plate or two? , 1998 .

[10]  T. Dixon,et al.  Relative motion between the Caribbean and North American plates and related boundary zone deformation from a decade of GPS observations , 1998 .

[11]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[12]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions , 1994 .

[13]  R. Mccaffrey.  Oblique plate convergence, slip vectors, and forearc deformation , 1992 .

[14]  P. Mann,et al.  SeaMARC II mapping of transform faults in the Cayman Trough, Caribbean Sea , 1991 .

[15]  S. Stein,et al.  Present-day kinematics of the Rivera Plate and implications for tectonics in southwestern Mexico , 1990 .

[16]  P. Bernard,et al.  Subduction and seismic hazard in the northern Lesser Antilles: Revision of the historical seismicity , 1988 .

[17]  S. Stein,et al.  A test of alternative Caribbean Plate relative motion models , 1988 .

[18]  S. Stein,et al.  Comment on “Subduction of aseismic ridges beneath the Caribbean Plate: Implications for the tectonics and seismic potential of the northeastern Caribbean” by W. R. McCann and L. R. Sykes , 1986 .

[19]  A. Kafka,et al.  Motion of Caribbean Plate during last 7 million years and implications for earlier Cenozoic movements , 1982 .

[20]  T. Jordan.  The present‐day motions of the Caribbean Plate , 1975 .

[21]  T. Dixon,et al.  GPS estimate of relative motion between the Caribbean and South American plates, and geologic implications for Trinidad and Venezuela , 2001 .