Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender?

The literature on gender differences in research performance seems to suggest a gap between men and women, where the former outperform the latter. Whether one agrees with the different factors proposed to explain the phenomenon, it is worthwhile to verify if comparing the performance within each gender, rather than without distinction, gives significantly different ranking lists. If there were some structural factor that determined a penalty in performance of female researchers compared to their male peers, then under conditions of equal capacities of men and women, any comparative evaluations of individual performance that fail to account for gender differences would lead to distortion of the judgments in favor of men. In this work we measure the extent of differences in rank between the two methods of comparing performance in each field of the hard sciences: for professors in the Italian university system, we compare the distributions of research performance for men and women and subsequently the ranking lists with and without distinction by gender. The results are of interest for the optimization of efficient selection in formulation of recruitment, career advancement and incentive schemes.

[1]  J. S. Long,et al.  Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1992 .

[2]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements , 2008 .

[3]  R Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  Gender analysis of papers published in ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA (1999-2006). , 2008, Actas espanolas de psiquiatria.

[4]  M. Rossiter.  The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science , 1993 .

[5]  F. Barjak,et al.  International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. , 2007 .

[6]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[8]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors , 2011, Scientometrics.

[9]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Gender differences in research collaboration , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[10]  Jonathan,et al.  THE PRODUCTIVITY PUZZLE : PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN PATTERNS OF PUBLICATION OF MEN AND WOMEN SCIENTISTS , 2004 .

[11]  Steven Stack,et al.  Gender, Children and Research Productivity , 2004 .

[12]  W. Lemoine,et al.  Productivity patterns of men and women scientists in Venezuela , 1992, Scientometrics.

[13]  Anne E. Lincoln,et al.  The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s , 2012, Social studies of science.

[14]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? , 2012, Scientometrics.

[15]  J. McDowell,et al.  Two to Tango? Gender Differences in the Decisions to Publish and Coauthor , 2006 .

[16]  A. O’Rand.  Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes (review) , 2004 .

[17]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[18]  M. Brink,et al.  Does Excellence have a Gender? A National Research Study on Recruitment and Selection Procedures for Professorial Appointments in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[19]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender and professional category of scientists , 2003, Scientometrics.

[20]  Robert F. Tate,et al.  Correlation Between a Discrete and a Continuous Variable. Point-Biserial Correlation , 1954 .

[21]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish university researchers in Geology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[22]  M. F. Fox.  Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists , 2005 .

[23]  L. Butler,et al.  Assessing university research: A plea for a balanced approach , 2007 .

[24]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system , 2009, Scientometrics.

[25]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1996 .

[26]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  A. N. Zainab.  Personal, academic and departmental correlates of research productivity: a review of literature , 1999 .

[28]  Angela M. O'Rand.  Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes.By Yu Xie and Kimberlee A. Shauman. Harvard University, 2003. 318 pp. Cloth, $59.95 , 2004 .

[29]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  Individual research performance: A proposal for comparing apples to oranges , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[30]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[31]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity , 2009, Scientometrics.

[32]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Mentoring in Academic Medicine , 2006 .

[33]  Cristiano Giuffrida,et al.  A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? , 1979, Scientometrics.

[35]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The effect of gender on research staff success in life sciences in the Spanish National Research Council , 2008 .

[36]  Halil Dundar,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 1998 .

[37]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  How do you define and measure research productivity? , 2014, Scientometrics.

[38]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? , 2011, Scientometrics.

[39]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences , 2006, Science.

[40]  J. McDowell,et al.  THE EFFECT OF GENDER‐SORTING ON PROPENSITY TO COAUTHOR: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACADEMIC PROMOTION , 1992 .

[41]  T. Ley,et al.  The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications , 2008, Science.

[42]  M. F. Fox.  Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review , 1983 .

[43]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing , 2009 .

[44]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered , 1985, Scientometrics.

[45]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results , 1998, Scientometrics.

[46]  Sharon E Straus,et al.  Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. , 2006, JAMA.

[47]  María Bordons,et al.  Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science , 2006, Scientometrics.

[48]  Yu Xie,et al.  Sex differences in research productivity : New evidence about an old puzzle , 1998 .

[49]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities , 2014 .

[50]  Filippo Radicchi,et al.  The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  Yuosre F. Badir,et al.  Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan , 2012, Scientometrics.

[52]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship , 2012, PloS one.

[53]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment , 2012, J. Informetrics.