Improving breast cancer sensitivity to paclitaxel by increasing aneuploidy

Significance Low levels of ATIP3 in breast tumors are associated with increased response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and ATIP3 silencing in breast cancer cells potentiates the effects of paclitaxel, highlighting the importance of this predictive biomarker to select breast cancer patients who are sensitive to taxane-based chemotherapy. ATIP3 depletion promotes mitotic abnormalities, including centrosome amplification and multipolar spindle formation, which is a source of chromosome segregation errors and aneuploidy. Excessive aneuploidy in ATIP3-deficient cells treated with low doses of paclitaxel results in massive cell death. Predictive biomarkers for tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are needed in breast cancer. This study investigates the predictive value of 280 genes encoding proteins that regulate microtubule assembly and function. By analyzing 3 independent multicenter randomized cohorts of breast cancer patients, we identified 17 genes that are differentially regulated in tumors achieving pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We focused on the MTUS1 gene, whose major product, ATIP3, is a microtubule-associated protein down-regulated in aggressive breast tumors. We show here that low levels of ATIP3 are associated with an increased pCR rate, pointing to ATIP3 as a predictive biomarker of breast tumor chemosensitivity. Using preclinical models of patient-derived xenografts and 3-dimensional models of breast cancer cell lines, we show that low ATIP3 levels sensitize tumors to the effects of taxanes but not DNA-damaging agents. ATIP3 silencing improves the proapoptotic effects of paclitaxel and induces mitotic abnormalities, including centrosome amplification and multipolar spindle formation, which results in chromosome missegregation leading to aneuploidy. As shown by time-lapse video microscopy, ATIP3 depletion exacerbates cytokinesis failure and mitotic death induced by low doses of paclitaxel. Our results favor a mechanism by which the combination of ATIP3 deficiency and paclitaxel treatment induces excessive aneuploidy, which in turn results in elevated cell death. Together, these studies highlight ATIP3 as an important regulator of mitotic integrity and a useful predictive biomarker for a population of chemoresistant breast cancer patients.

[1]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Combinatorial expression of microtubule-associated EB1 and ATIP3 biomarkers improves breast cancer prognosis , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[2]  V. Villegas,et al.  The Role of Chromosomal Instability in Cancer and Therapeutic Responses , 2017, Cancers.

[3]  Florence Hubert,et al.  Exploring the effect of end-binding proteins and microtubule targeting chemotherapy drugs on microtubule dynamic instability. , 2017, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  W. Tjalma,et al.  Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: Challenges and uncertainties. , 2017, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  L. Pelletier,et al.  Mitotic spindle assembly in animal cells: a fine balancing act , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  D. Lambrechts,et al.  Centrosome Amplification Is Sufficient to Promote Spontaneous Tumorigenesis in Mammals. , 2017, Developmental cell.

[7]  J. Balko,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease , 2016, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Sabine Petry Mechanisms of Mitotic Spindle Assembly. , 2016, Annual review of biochemistry.

[9]  M. Burkard,et al.  Centrosome amplification induces high grade features and is prognostic of worse outcomes in breast cancer , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[10]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Predictive and Prognostic Value of the TauProtein in Breast Cancer. , 2015, Anticancer research.

[11]  Frédérique Penault-Llorca,et al.  Can pathologic complete response (pCR) be used as a surrogate marker of survival after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? , 2015, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[12]  G. von Minckwitz,et al.  Comprehensive Review on the Surrogate Endpoints of Efficacy Proposed or Hypothesized in the Scientific Community Today. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[13]  Sarah Watson,et al.  Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[14]  R. Osan,et al.  Rampant centrosome amplification underlies more aggressive disease course of triple negative breast cancers , 2015, Oncotarget.

[15]  X. Tan,et al.  Predictive value of microtubule-associated protein Tau in patients with recurrent and metastatic breast cancer treated with taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy , 2015, Tumor Biology.

[16]  Georges Noel,et al.  Three-Dimensional Cell Culture: A Breakthrough in Vivo , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[17]  B. Weaver,et al.  How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells , 2014, Molecular biology of the cell.

[18]  Kelly K Hunt,et al.  Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. , 2014, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[19]  Mark E. Burkard,et al.  Cytotoxicity of Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer Is due to Chromosome Missegregation on Multipolar Spindles , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  M. Mathieu,et al.  Challenging single- and multi-probesets gene expression signatures of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: experience of the REMAGUS 02 phase II trial. , 2013, Breast.

[21]  Lauren M. Zasadil,et al.  Chromosome missegregation rate predicts whether aneuploidy will promote or suppress tumors , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  ATIP3, a novel prognostic marker of breast cancer patient survival, limits cancer cell migration and slows metastatic progression by regulating microtubule dynamics. , 2013, Cancer research.

[23]  Yi-long Wu,et al.  Tau expression correlated with breast cancer sensitivity to taxanes-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2013, Tumor Biology.

[24]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  L. Harris,et al.  Evaluation of prognostic and predictive value of microtubule associated protein tau in two independent cohorts , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.

[26]  C. Nahmias,et al.  An ATIPical family of angiotensin II AT2 receptor-interacting proteins , 2010, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[27]  R. Medema,et al.  Elevating the frequency of chromosome mis-segregation as a strategy to kill tumor cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  8p22 MTUS1 Gene Product ATIP3 Is a Novel Anti-Mitotic Protein Underexpressed in Invasive Breast Carcinoma of Poor Prognosis , 2009, PloS one.

[29]  David Pellman,et al.  A Mechanism Linking Extra Centrosomes to Chromosomal Instability , 2009, Nature.

[30]  Alexey Khodjakov,et al.  Centrosome Amplification Can Initiate Tumorigenesis in Flies , 2008, Cell.

[31]  E. Winer,et al.  Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[33]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  A New Model of Patient Tumor-Derived Breast Cancer Xenografts for Preclinical Assays , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Microtubule-Associated Protein-tau is a Bifunctional Predictor of Endocrine Sensitivity and Chemotherapy Resistance in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[35]  P. Pineau,et al.  Structural organization and expression of human MTUS1, a candidate 8p22 tumor suppressor gene encoding a family of angiotensin II AT2 receptor-interacting proteins, ATIP. , 2006, Gene.

[36]  J. Ross,et al.  Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[38]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Microtubule-associated protein tau: a marker of paclitaxel sensitivity in breast cancer. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[40]  S. Horwitz,et al.  Differential mitotic responses to microtubule-stabilizing and -destabilizing drugs. , 2002, Cancer research.