Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the percutaneous device closure of a consecutive series of patients with periprosthetic paravalvular leaks referred to our structural heart disease center with congestive heart failure and hemolytic anemia. BACKGROUND Clinically significant periprosthetic paravalvular leak is an uncommon but serious complication after surgical valve replacement. Percutaneous closure has been utilized as an alternative to surgical repair of this defect in high-risk surgical patients. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 57 percutaneous paravalvular leak closures that were performed in 43 patients (67% male, mean age 69.4 ± 11.7 years) between April 2006 and September 2010. Integrated imaging modalities were used for the evaluation, planning, and guidance of the interventions. RESULTS Closure was successful in 86% of leaks and in 86% of patients. Twenty-eight of 35 patients improved by at least 1 New York Heart Association functional class. The percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions and/or erythropoietin injections post-procedure decreased from 56% to 5%. Clinical success was achieved in 89% of the patients in whom procedure was successful. The survival rates for patients at 6, 12, and 18 months after paravalvular leak closures were 91.9%, 89.2%, and 86.5%, respectively. Freedom from cardiac-related death at 42 months post-procedure was 91.9%. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous closure of symptomatic paravalvular leaks, facilitated by integrated imaging modalities has a high rate of acute and long-term success and appears to be effective in managing symptoms of heart failure and hemolytic anemia.

[1]  E. Tay,et al.  Transcatheter closure of paravalvular defects using a purpose-specific occluder. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  A. Moreo,et al.  Mitral valve periprosthetic leakage: Anatomical observations in 135 patients from a multicentre study. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  P. Vernant,et al.  Long-term evaluation of bioprosthetic valves: 615 consecutive cases. , 1984, European heart journal.

[4]  J. M. Bernal,et al.  Reoperation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. A decade of clinical experience. , 1991, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[5]  G. Venn,et al.  Paraprosthetic leak: a complication of cardiac valve replacement. , 1991, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  W G Henderson,et al.  Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  A. Menchero,et al.  Cierre percutáneo de las dehiscencias periprotésicas mitrales. ¿La alternativa a una cirugía de alto riesgo? , 2009 .

[8]  Bijoy K Khandheria,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Card , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[9]  A. Menchero,et al.  Percutaneous Treatment of Mitral Valve Periprosthetic Leakage. An Alternative to High-Risk Surgery? , 2009 .

[10]  A. Vahanian,et al.  Indications for surgery in mitral regurgitation. , 1991, European heart journal.

[11]  B. Seifert,et al.  Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with aggressive surgery? , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  J. F. Keane,et al.  Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  J. Roelandt,et al.  Images in Cardiovascular Medicine , 2000 .

[14]  C. Tamburino,et al.  Images in cardiovascular medicine. Late device dislodgement after percutaneous closure of mitral prosthesis paravalvular leak with Amplatzer muscular ventricular septal defect occluder. , 2007, Circulation.

[15]  S. Yuan,et al.  Displacement of the Amplatzer occluder device from the mitral paraprosthetic leak. , 2008, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[16]  D. Hagler,et al.  Successful percutaneous repair of perivalvular prosthetic regurgitation , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[17]  J. M. Revuelta,et al.  Reintervenciones múltiples sobre la válvula mitral: 30 años de experiencia , 2009 .

[18]  G. Calle Pérez,et al.  Percutaneous treatment of mitral valve periprosthetic leakage. An alternative to high-risk surgery? , 2009, Revista Española de Cardiología.

[19]  N. Wunderlich,et al.  Catheter closure of paravalvular leak. , 2006, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  R. Kornowski,et al.  Percutaneous closure of perivalvular leaks with Amplatzer occluders: feasibility, safety, and shortterm results. , 2007, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[21]  J. Webb,et al.  Percutaneous closure of prosthetic paravalvular leaks: Case series and review , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in percutaneous transcatheter repairs of paravalvular mitral regurgitation. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  J. M. Bernal,et al.  Repeat mitral valve replacement: 30-years' experience. , 2009, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[24]  D. Miller,et al.  Reoperation for aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: identification of patients at risk and results of operation. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[25]  Olivier Gérard,et al.  Integrating functional and anatomical information to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[26]  A. Fraser,et al.  Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography , 2003, Heart.

[27]  J. Ramires,et al.  Multivariate analysis of risk factors for hospital mortality in valvular reoperations for prosthetic valve dysfunction. , 2002, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[28]  T. Grimaldi,et al.  Aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomic observations and surgical results. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  I. Kronzon,et al.  Closure of prosthetic paravalvular leaks: a long way to go , 2010 .