The interplay of dormancy and transfer in bacterial populations: Invasion, fixation and coexistence regimes.

In this paper we investigate the interplay between two fundamental mechanisms of microbial population dynamics and evolution, namely dormancy and horizontal gene transfer. The corresponding traits come in many guises and are ubiquitous in microbial communities, affecting their dynamics in important ways. Recently, they have each moved (separately) into the focus of stochastic individual-based modelling (Billiard et al. 2016, 2018; Champagnat, Méléard and Tran, 2019; Blath and Tóbiás 2020). Here, we investigate their combined effects in a unified model. Indeed, we consider the (idealized) scenario of two sub-populations, respectively carrying 'trait 1' and 'trait 2', where trait 1 individuals are able to switch (under competitive pressure) into a dormant state, and trait 2 individuals are able to execute horizontal gene transfer, which in our case means that they can turn trait 1 individuals into trait 2 ones, at a rate depending on the density of individuals. In the large-population limit, we examine the fate of (i) a single trait 2 individual (called 'mutant') arriving in a trait 1 resident population living in equilibrium, and (ii) a trait 1 individual ('mutant') arriving in a trait 2 resident population. We analyse the invasion dynamics in all cases where the resident population is individually fit and the behaviour of the mutant population is initially non-critical. This leads to the identification of parameter regimes for the invasion and fixation of the new trait, stable coexistence of the two traits, and 'founder control' (where the initial resident always dominates, irrespective of its trait). One of our key findings is that horizontal transfer can lead to stable coexistence even if trait 2 is unfit on its own. In the case of founder control, the limiting dynamical system also exhibits a coexistence equilibrium, which, however, is unstable, and with overwhelming probability none of the mutant sub-populations is able to invade. In all cases, we observe the classical (up to three) phases of invasion dynamics à la Champagnat (2006).

[1]  D. Roszak,et al.  Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment , 1987 .

[2]  N. Kurt,et al.  Genetic Variability Under the Seedbank Coalescent , 2015, Genetics.

[3]  J. Lennon,et al.  Evolution with a seed bank: The population genetic consequences of microbial dormancy , 2017, bioRxiv.

[4]  J. Vandermeer Some complications of the elementary forms of competition in a source/sink and metacommunity context: the role of intranstive loops , 2015, 1502.05225.

[5]  Anton Bovier Stochastic models for adaptive dynamics: Scaling limits and diversity , 2019, Probabilistic Structures in Evolution.

[6]  S. Ellner,et al.  ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. I. Logistic-type models. , 1985, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  N. Kurt,et al.  The seed bank coalescent with simultaneous switching , 2018, 1812.03783.

[8]  K. Lewis,et al.  Persister cells. , 2010, Annual review of microbiology.

[9]  Manon Costa,et al.  A stochastic model for speciation by mating preferences , 2016, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[10]  Peter Pfaffelhuber,et al.  The infinitely many genes model with horizontal gene transfer , 2013, 1301.6547.

[11]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch , 2004, Science.

[12]  C. Camille,et al.  Emergence of homogamy in a two-loci stochastic population model , 2019, 1902.07926.

[13]  C. Gyles,et al.  Horizontally Transferred Genetic Elements and Their Role in Pathogenesis of Bacterial Disease , 2014, Veterinary pathology.

[14]  M. Freidlin,et al.  Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems , 1984 .

[15]  Supercritical multitype branching processes: the ancestral types of typical individuals , 2003, Advances in Applied Probability.

[16]  D. Cohen Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  A. Sussman,et al.  Dormancy in Microbial Spores , 1973 .

[18]  N. Kurt,et al.  A NEW COALESCENT FOR SEEDBANK MODELS By , 2020 .

[19]  Eugene V. Koonin,et al.  Evolution of microbes and viruses: a paradigm shift in evolutionary biology? , 2012, Front. Cell. Inf. Microbio..

[20]  N. Kurt,et al.  A new coalescent for seed-bank models , 2014, 1411.4747.

[21]  Richard J. Whittington,et al.  Survival and Dormancy of Mycobacterium aviumsubsp. paratuberculosis in theEnvironment , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence , 2005, Genetics.

[23]  W. Stephan,et al.  Inference of seed bank parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Nicolas Champagnat,et al.  Stochastic analysis of emergence of evolutionary cyclic behavior in population dynamics with transfer , 2019, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[25]  P. Collet,et al.  The effect of competition and horizontal trait inheritance on invasion, fixation, and polymorphism. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  J. Lederberg,et al.  Gene Recombination in Escherichia Coli , 1946, Nature.

[27]  S. Ethier,et al.  Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence , 2005 .

[28]  Nicolas Champagnat A microscopic interpretation for adaptive dynamics trait substitution sequence models , 2005, math/0512063.

[29]  H. Ochman,et al.  Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation , 2000, Nature.

[30]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  Coalescent theory for seed bank models , 2001, Journal of Applied Probability.

[31]  J. Lennon,et al.  Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[32]  Stochastic dynamics for adaptation and evolution of microorganisms , 2016, 1610.00983.

[33]  M. G. Bulmer,et al.  Delayed germination of seeds: Cohen's model revisited , 1984 .