Are far off hills really greener? The Impact of REPS on Farmer Behaviour

The Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) was introduced under Council Regulation 2078/92 in order to encourage farmers to carry out their activities in a more extensive and environmentally friendly manner. This article, using National Farm Survey (NFS) data, examines the extent to which farming activities that can help or hinder the environment have changed due to farmer participation in the REPS scheme. The analysis shows that REPS has had a substantial impact on the use of chemical nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. Also, participation in REPS may have resulted in a more significant reduction in the production of organic nitrogen, organic phosphorous and methane emissions than would have been the case if the REPS farmers in the NFS had not joined the scheme.

[1]  Damodar N. Gujarati.  Basic Econometrics, 4th Edition , 2004 .

[2]  Stephen Hynes,et al.  Modelling habitat conservation and participation in agri-environmental schemes: A spatial microsimulation approach , 2008 .

[3]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[4]  Rolf A. Groeneveld,et al.  Ecological Effectiveness of Agri‐Environment Schemes in Different Agricultural Landscapes in The Netherlands , 2004 .

[5]  David Kleijn,et al.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes , 2001, Nature.

[6]  Stephen Hynes,et al.  Assessing the Sustainability of Irish Farming , 2008 .

[7]  H. Emerson,et al.  The Rural Environment Protection Scheme of the Republic of Ireland , 1999 .

[8]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Benefit Estimates for Landscape Improvements: Sequential Bayesian Design and Respondents’ Rationality in a Choice Experiment , 2005, Land Economics.

[9]  S. Wotton,et al.  Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK , 2001 .

[10]  Dan Chamberlain,et al.  Declining Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes and the Effectiveness of Agri-environment Schemes , 2004, Ambio.

[11]  Pierre Dupraz,et al.  An Investigation of Policy Administrative Costs Using Panel Data for the English Environmentally Sensitive Areas , 2008 .

[12]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature , 2005, Science.

[13]  Danny Campbell,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements: Combining Mixed Logit and Random-Effects Models , 2007 .

[14]  M. Common,et al.  Natural resource and environmental economics , 1996 .

[15]  Mary Ann Cunningham.  A Comparison of Public Lands and Farmlands for Grassland Bird Conservation , 2005 .

[16]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[17]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Valuing the diversity of biodiversity , 2006 .

[18]  P. Dupraz,et al.  The Environmental Supply of Farm Households: A Flexible Willingness to Accept Model , 2003 .

[19]  M. Nowakowski,et al.  The effect of arable field margin composition on invertebrate biodiversity , 2002 .

[20]  Jim Kinsella,et al.  Connecting environmental management and farm household livelihoods: The Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland , 2001 .

[21]  Alan Matthews,et al.  Has agricultural policy responded to the Rio challenge , 2001 .

[22]  Bernard Amiaud,et al.  Biodiversity: Function and Assessment in Agricultural Areas: A Review , 2005 .

[23]  Ann-Christin Weibull,et al.  Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[24]  Jane Feehan,et al.  The impact of the Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) on plant and insect diversity , 2002 .