Static and dynamic models of observation toward earth by satellite coverage

In satellite mission planning in order to observe area targets, it is needed to decompose area targets into small pieces and compute visible time windows for sub-area targets. Therefore, it is expected to compute geodetic location of ground target observed or to compute observing time by satellite with some certain sensing actions, such as slew-looking. This paper presents static and dynamic models of observing ground targets by satellite for above two problems respectively. The static model is to compute the geodetic location coordinates at which boresight of sensor with a certain roll angle is pointing. Furthermore a reverse model, to be used in dynamic model, is derived from the static model to compute subsatellite point (SSP) if roll angle and target location are known. Then, the dynamic model is designed to determine the observing SSP and roll angle if target location is known. The observing SSP corresponds to observing time, and roll angle is sensing action for slew-looking. The dynamic model use the reverse model developed from the static model to compute virtual SSPs according to a series of rolls, and then get intersection point of virtual SSPs and real SSPs by prediction. During dynamic model development, it is proved that the closest point of SSPs to the ground point is not always the demanded SSP. Finally experiments are presented and compared with results by Satellite Tool Kit (STK) to verify proposed models.

[1]  Alan R. Washburn Earth Coverage by Satellites in Circular Orbit , 2004 .

[2]  C. Joblin,et al.  Spectroscopy of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and very small grains in photodissociation regions , 2005 .

[3]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[4]  B. Draine INTERSTELLAR DUST GRAINS , 2003, astro-ph/0304489.

[5]  Michael W. Werner,et al.  The spitzer space telescope mission , 2005 .

[6]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Comparison of Pansharpening Algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S Data-Fusion Contest , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Gérard Verfaillie,et al.  Selecting and scheduling observations of agile satellites , 2002 .

[8]  C. Joblin,et al.  Analysis of the emission of very small dust particles from Spitzer spectro-imagery data using blind signal separation methods , 2007 .

[9]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  A survey of Sparse Component Analysis for blind source separation: principles, perspectives, and new challenges , 2006, ESANN.

[10]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization , 2000, NIPS.

[11]  Jean-Francois Cardoso,et al.  Blind signal separation: statistical principles , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[12]  Gérard Verfaillie,et al.  Estimation of the Minimal Duration of an Attitude Change for an Autonomous Agile Earth-Observing Satellite , 2007, CP.

[13]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  Planning algorithms , 2006 .