Validation of spontaneous abortion diagnoses in the Danish National Registry of Patients

Purpose The purpose of this study is to validate the diagnosis of spontaneous abortion (SA) recorded in the Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP). Methods We randomly selected patients registered in the DNRP with a diagnosis of SA between 1980 and 2008 from hospitals in the county of North Jutland and searched for their discharge records in hospital files. We estimated positive predictive value (PPV) of the DNRP diagnosis and stratified the analysis by period (1980–1994 versus 1995–2008), hospital type (regional versus local), and International Classification of Diseases revisions (ICD-8 versus ICD-10). Results We could identify hospital files of 117/174 (67%) sampled registration records. Of those, the diagnosis was confirmed in 114 patients, yielding a PPV of 97.4% (95% confidence interval = 92.7%–99.5%). The PPV did not markedly vary by period, hospital type, or ICD revision. Among the three patients with available data who did not fulfill the criteria for SA, one had an induced abortion and two had threatened abortion but did not miscarry. Conclusion Registration of SA in the DNRP accurately reflects the diagnoses recorded in medical charts. The DNRP is a suitable source of data on SAs for epidemiologic research.

[1]  L. F. Horney,et al.  Accuracy of spontaneous abortion recall. , 1984, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  M. Osler,et al.  The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  Brämer Gr International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth revision. , 1988, World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales.

[4]  T. F. Andersen,et al.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. , 1999, Danish medical bulletin.

[5]  P. Mortensen,et al.  The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. , 2006, Danish medical bulletin.

[6]  G. Axelsson Use of questionnaires in a study of spontaneous abortion in a general population. , 1990, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  B. Thomsen,et al.  Validity of diagnoses of and operations for nonmalignant gynecological conditions in the Danish National Hospital Registry. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  B. Ottesen,et al.  Spontaneous abortion: A prospective cohort study of younger women from the general population in Denmark. Validation, occurrence and risk determinants , 2006, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[9]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Data Quality of Administratively Collected Hospital Discharge Data for Liver Cirrhosis Epidemiology , 1997, Journal of Medical Systems.

[10]  L Frank,et al.  When an Entire Country Is a Cohort , 2000, Science.

[11]  T. Nickelsen,et al.  [Data validity and coverage in the Danish National Health Registry. A literature review]. , 2001, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[12]  D. Savitz,et al.  The effects of joint misclassification of exposure and disease on epidemiologic measures of association. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  Who: Recommended Definitions, Terminology and Format for Statistical Tables Related to The Perinatal Period And Use of A New Certificate For Cause of Perinatal Deaths , 1977, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[14]  K. Hemminki,et al.  Nationwide data base on medically diagnosed spontaneous abortions in Finland. , 1988, International journal of epidemiology.