A five-dimensional approach to sustainability for prioritizing energy production systems using a revised GRA method: A case study

Abstract In recent decades, determining the most appropriate energy producers in the power industry is considered as a strategic factor in moving toward sustainable development. In this paper, energy producers have been assessed by a five-dimensional approach to sustainability as a very strong representation of the energy sustainability. These five comprehensive aspects are environmental, social, economic, technical, and institutional. To rank the energy producers and to overcome the ambiguity of linguistic values of experts' subjective preferences, a revised Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) technique based on the grey numbers is used. To show the performance of the five-dimensional approach, and to verify the developed approach, a case study on Iran's power industry is considered. For this purpose, a number of exploratory interviews were conducted with the experts of the Renewable Energy Organization of Iran (SUNA) and with some academic specialists, and the main factors affecting sustainability assessment of energy producers were identified. To validate the capability of the proposed model, results were compared with the outcome of the GRA method. The results demonstrate the practicality and feasibility of research and indicate that natural gas, solar energy, and wind power are ranked first to third, respectively.

[1]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations , 2017 .

[2]  M. Rahmanpour,et al.  Integration of sustainable development concepts in open pit mine design , 2015 .

[3]  Ivan Vera,et al.  Energy indicators for sustainable development , 2007 .

[4]  Donya Rahmani,et al.  Sustainability risk management in the supply chain of telecommunication companies: A case study , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[5]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Developing a novel risk-based methodology for multi-criteria decision making in marine renewable energy applications , 2017 .

[6]  San-yang Liu,et al.  An extended GRA method for MCDM with interval-valued triangular fuzzy assessments and unknown weights , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Environmental benefits of domestic solar energy systems , 2004 .

[8]  J. Deng,et al.  Introduction to Grey system theory , 1989 .

[9]  José Goldemberg,et al.  The promise of clean energy , 2006 .

[10]  Isabel Soares,et al.  Analyzing the sustainable energy development in the EU-15 by an aggregated synthetic index , 2016 .

[11]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[12]  Abdelkrim Liazid,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system , 2017 .

[13]  Mahour Mellat-Parast,et al.  Developing a grey-based decision-making model for supplier selection , 2012 .

[14]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[15]  Heather Cruickshank,et al.  The role for low carbon electrification technologies in poverty reduction and climate change strategies: A focus on renewable energy mini-grids with case studies in Nepal, Peru and Kenya , 2012 .

[16]  Reza Hafezi,et al.  A new hybrid decision framework for prioritizing funding allocation to Iran's energy sector , 2017 .

[17]  Farideh Atabi,et al.  Renewable energy in Iran: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development , 2004 .

[18]  Sifeng Liu,et al.  Hybrid Grey Interval Relation Decision-Making in Artistic Talent Evaluation of Player , 2012, ArXiv.

[19]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context , 2015, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Arezoo Entezaminia,et al.  Robust aggregate production planning in a green supply chain under uncertainty considering reverse logistics: a case study , 2017 .

[21]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. , 2011 .

[22]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Sustainable Energy Development Index: A multi-dimensional indicator for measuring sustainable energy development , 2015 .

[23]  Emanuela Colombo,et al.  Sustainable energy in Africa: A comprehensive data and policies review , 2014 .

[24]  K. Govindan,et al.  A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach , 2013 .

[25]  Damien Bazin,et al.  Solar thermal energy for sustainable development in Tunisia: The case of the PROSOL project , 2015 .

[26]  Gholamhassan Najafi,et al.  Solar energy in Iran: Current state and outlook , 2015 .

[27]  P. Abbaszadeh,et al.  Iran's oil development scenarios by 2025 , 2013 .

[28]  Chandra Ade Irawan,et al.  A multi-criteria port suitability assessment for developments in the offshore wind industry , 2017 .

[29]  I. Dincer,et al.  Energy, environment and sustainable development , 1999 .

[30]  Jari Lyytimäki,et al.  From sustainability to well-being: Lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level , 2013 .

[31]  Ümran Şengül,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey , 2015 .