Insights into the dosimetric and geometric characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: A systematic review

Background GammaKnife (GK) and CyberKnife (CK) have been the mainstay stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) solution for multiple brain metastases (MBM) for several years. Recent technological advancement has seen an increase in single-isocentre C-arm linac-based SRS. This systematic review focuses on dosimetric and geometric insights into contemporary MBM SRS and thereby establish if linac-based SRS has matured to match the mainstay SRS delivery systems. Methods The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were interrogated which yielded 891 relevant articles that narrowed to 20 articles after removing duplicates and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary studies which reported the use of SRS for treatment of MBM SRS and reported the technical aspects including dosimetry were included. The review was limited to English language publications from January 2015 to August 2023. Only full-length papers were included in the final analysis. Opinion papers, commentary pieces, letters to the editor, abstracts, conference proceedings and editorials were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The reporting of conformity indices (CI) and gradient indices, V12Gy, monitor units and the impact of translational and rotational shifts were extracted and analysed. Results The single-isocentre technique for MBM dominated recent SRS studies and the most studied delivery platforms were Varian. The C-arm linac-based SRS plan quality and normal brain tissue sparing was comparable to GK and CK and in some cases better. The most used nominal beam energy was 6FFF, and optimised couch and collimator angles could reduce mean normal brain dose by 11.3%. Reduction in volume of the healthy brain receiving a certain dose was dependent on the number and size of the metastases and the relative geometric location. GK and CK required 4.5–8.4 times treatment time compared with linac-based SRS. Rotational shifts caused larger changes in CI in C-arm linac-based single-isocentre SRS. Conclusion C-arm linac-based SRS produced comparable MBM plan quality and the delivery is notably shorter compared to GK and CK SRS.

[1]  H. Rozati,et al.  Overall survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for ten or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2023, BMC Cancer.

[2]  S. Sorensen,et al.  Machine performance and stability of the first clinical self‐shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system: Initial 2‐year experience , 2022, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  J. Régis,et al.  ISRS Technical Guidelines for Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Treatment of Small Brain Metastases (≤1 cm in diameter). , 2022, Practical radiation oncology.

[4]  S. S.,et al.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of Single Isocenter Multiple Target SRS Plans and the Analytical Relationship between Plan Quality Indices with the Number and Volume of Targets , 2022, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[5]  A. Sahgal,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole brain radiotherapy in patients with intracranial metastatic disease and small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2022, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  P. Brown,et al.  Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2022, Practical radiation oncology.

[7]  G. Landry,et al.  Single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: Impact of patient misalignments on target coverage in non-coplanar treatments , 2022, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[8]  J. Poder,et al.  Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys , 2022, Physical and engineering sciences in medicine.

[9]  I. Barani,et al.  ZAP-X Gyroscopic Radiosurgery System: A Preliminary Analysis of Clinical Applications within a Retrospective Case Series , 2021, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[10]  V. Wu,et al.  Comparison of dosimetric impact of intra‐fractional setup discrepancy between multiple‐ and single‐isocenter approaches in linac‐based stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases , 2021, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[11]  G. Umana,et al.  Whole Brain Irradiation or Stereotactic RadioSurgery for five or more brain metastases (WHOBI-STER): A prospective comparative study of neurocognitive outcomes, level of autonomy in daily activities and quality of life , 2021, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[12]  S. Tenn,et al.  PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SINGLE ISOCENTER LINAC RADIOSURGERY OF MULITPLE BRAIN METASTASESShort Running Title:Single isocenter SRS of multiple mets. , 2021, Practical radiation oncology.

[13]  Sei-Kwon Kang,et al.  Combined effect of dose gradient and rotational error on prescribed dose coverage for single isocenter multiple brain metastases in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy , 2021, Radiation oncology.

[14]  Mario Perez,et al.  Improving efficiency in the radiation management of multiple brain metastases using a knowledge‐based planning solution for single‐isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique , 2021, Journal of medical radiation sciences.

[15]  M. Cao,et al.  Evaluation of the correlation between dosimetric, geometric, and technical parameters of radiosurgery planning for multiple brain metastases , 2021, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[16]  L. Marcu,et al.  Progress and prospects of flattening filter free beam technology in radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy. , 2021, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[17]  A. Sloan,et al.  Limited brain metastases: a narrative review. , 2021, Annals of palliative medicine.

[18]  P. Maingon,et al.  Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics , 2021, Radiation oncology.

[19]  S. Sorensen,et al.  Treatment planning system and beam data validation for the ZAP-X: a novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system. , 2021, Medical physics.

[20]  T. Fujimoto,et al.  Evaluation of intrafractional head motion for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with a thermoplastic frameless mask and ceiling-floor-mounted image guidance device. , 2021, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[21]  T. Pietrzykowski,et al.  The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient comprehension—systematic review , 2021, Trials.

[22]  J. Adler,et al.  The Zap-X Radiosurgical System in the Treatment of Intracranial Tumors: A Technical Case Report , 2021, Neurosurgery.

[23]  W. Tomé,et al.  Single isocenter treatment planning techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple cranial metastases , 2021, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology.

[24]  W. Clair,et al.  Dynamic conformal arcs-based single-isocenter VMAT planning technique for radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases. , 2020, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[25]  E. Bossart,et al.  Assessment of single isocenter linear accelerator radiosurgery for metastases and base of skull lesions. , 2020, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[26]  T. Seibert,et al.  Automated contouring and planning pipeline for hippocampal-avoidant whole-brain radiotherapy , 2020, Radiation oncology.

[27]  R. Sasamoto,et al.  Effect of setup error in the single‐isocenter technique on stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases , 2020, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[28]  W. S. St. Clair,et al.  Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases: Potential Loss of Target(s) Coverage Due to Isocenter Misalignment , 2020, Cureus.

[29]  E. Yorke,et al.  Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain. , 2020, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  A. Garg,et al.  Executive Summary from American Radium Society's Appropriate Use Criteria on Neurocognition after stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases. , 2020, Neuro-oncology.

[31]  J. Kuo,et al.  Flattening filter free beam energy selection and its impact in multitarget intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. , 2020, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[32]  Z. Wen,et al.  Selection of single-isocenter for multiple-target stereotactic brain radiosurgery to minimize total margin volume , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  J. Debus,et al.  Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy vs. CyberKnife M6 for the Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[34]  M. Ayadi,et al.  Brain metastases treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: 8 years experience after Cyberknife installation , 2020, Radiation Oncology.

[35]  M. Ayadi,et al.  Brain metastases treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: 8 years experience after Cyberknife installation , 2020, Radiation oncology.

[36]  Eleftherios P Pappas,et al.  Dosimetric impact of rotational errors on the quality of VMAT‐SRS for multiple brain metastases: Comparison between single‐ and two‐isocenter treatment planning techniques , 2020, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[37]  Kengo Ito,et al.  Automated noncoplanar treatment planning strategy in stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple cranial metastases: HyperArc and CyberKnife dose distributions. , 2019, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[38]  T. Seppi,et al.  Intrafractional 6D head movement increases with time of mask fixation during stereotactic intracranial RT-sessions , 2019, Radiation Oncology.

[39]  Xin A. Wang,et al.  Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C‐arm linear accelerator based plans , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[40]  P. Brown,et al.  Single-Isocenter Multitarget Stereotactic Radiosurgery Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases , 2019, Advances in radiation oncology.

[41]  C. Shi,et al.  Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison With Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife , 2019, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[42]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Radiation Therapy Practice Patterns for Brain Metastases in the United States in the Stereotactic Radiosurgery Era , 2019, Advances in radiation oncology.

[43]  A. Nichol,et al.  LINAC based stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: guidance for clinical implementation , 2019, Acta oncologica.

[44]  C. Belka,et al.  Single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: dosimetric comparison of VMAT and a dedicated DCAT planning tool , 2019, Radiation Oncology.

[45]  Yan Yu,et al.  Multi-Institutional Dosimetric Evaluation of Modern Day Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Treatment Options for Multiple Brain Metastases , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[46]  K. Senthilnathan,et al.  Dosimetric Effect of Rotational Setup Errors in Single-Isocenter Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy of Multiple Brain Metastases , 2019, Journal of medical physics.

[47]  K. Murotani,et al.  Comparison between stereotactic radiosurgery and whole-brain radiotherapy for 10-20 brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. , 2019, Molecular and clinical oncology.

[48]  M. Guckenberger,et al.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases , 2019, Current Treatment Options in Neurology.

[49]  Oliver Blanck,et al.  ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams , 2019, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[50]  I. Paddick,et al.  A novel index for assessing treatment plan quality in stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2018, Journal of neurosurgery.

[51]  A. Akabane,et al.  Multiinstitutional prospective observational study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (JLGK0901 study-NSCLC). , 2018, Journal of neurosurgery.

[52]  S. Menon,et al.  Evaluation of Plan Quality Metrics in Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiotherapy in the Treatment Plans of Arteriovenous Malformations , 2018, Journal of medical physics.

[53]  M. Zeverino,et al.  Dosimetric analysis of Tomotherapy-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastasis. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[54]  dieBehandlungspezifischer.  Onkologie , 2018, HNO.

[55]  Shivank Garg,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery practice patterns for brain metastases in the United States: a national survey , 2018, Journal of Radiation Oncology.

[56]  Benjamín Cruz,et al.  CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in brain metastases: A report from Latin America with literature review. , 2018, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[57]  M. Taphoorn,et al.  Individual changes in neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life in patients with brain oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy , 2018, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[58]  Taeho Kim,et al.  Monitoring frequency of intra‐fraction patient motion using the ExacTrac system for LINAC‐based SRS treatments , 2018, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[59]  L. Cozzi,et al.  In silico assessment of the dosimetric quality of a novel, automated radiation treatment planning strategy for linac-based radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases and a comparison with robotic methods , 2018, Radiation oncology.

[60]  F. Alongi,et al.  Linac-based VMAT radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions: comparison between a conventional multi-isocenter approach and a new dedicated mono-isocenter technique , 2018, Radiation oncology.

[61]  S. Ohira,et al.  HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach , 2018, Radiation Oncology.

[62]  I. Paddick,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: Results of multicenter benchmark planning studies. , 2017, Practical radiation oncology.

[63]  D. Heron,et al.  Exceptional Eight-year Response to Stereotactic Radiosurgery Monotherapy for Multiple Brain Metastases , 2017, Cureus.

[64]  Ioana R. Bonta,et al.  Fractionated Radiosurgery Alone for Thirty-seven Brain Metastases: Not Everything that can be Counted Counts , 2017, Cureus.

[65]  P. Lambin,et al.  Whole brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery for 4–10 brain metastases: a phase III randomised multicentre trial , 2017, BMC Cancer.

[66]  Lijun Ma,et al.  Normal Brain Sparing With Increasing Number of Beams and Isocenters in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Beam Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases , 2016, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[67]  Q. Lin,et al.  Dosimetric superiority of flattening filter free beams for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in single brain metastasis , 2016, Oncotarget.

[68]  Y. Mori,et al.  Dosimetric Study of Automatic Brain Metastases Planning in Comparison with Conventional Multi-Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases , 2016, Cureus.

[69]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of Treatment Geometry to Reduce Normal Brain Dose in Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases with Single–Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[70]  D. Heron,et al.  Dosimetric comparison between cone/Iris‐based and InCise MLC‐based CyberKnife plans for single and multiple brain metastases , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[71]  Volker W Stieber,et al.  Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[72]  B. Rhein,et al.  Radiosurgery with flattening-filter-free techniques in the treatment of brain metastases , 2016, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[73]  Yan Yu,et al.  Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[74]  David A. Larson,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern management of patients with brain metastases , 2016, Oncotarget.

[75]  Michael Peacock,et al.  Volumetric Radiosurgery for 1 to 10 Brain Metastases: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[76]  M. Casati,et al.  Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in the management of single and multiple brain metastases , 2016, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[77]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[78]  R. Corvò,et al.  Radiosurgery with Helical Tomotherapy , 2015, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[79]  Anees Dhabaan,et al.  Single-Isocenter Multiple-Target Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Risk of Compromised Coverage. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[80]  T. Nariai,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: a case-matched study comparing treatment results for patients with 2-9 versus 10 or more tumors. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[81]  M. Ruge,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases , 2014, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[82]  T. Nariai,et al.  A case-matched study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: comparing treatment results for 1-4 vs ≥ 5 tumors: clinical article. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[83]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery using the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion unit in the management of patients with 10 or more brain metastases. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery.

[84]  A. Bozzao,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[85]  C. Lindquist,et al.  Thirty years' experience with Gamma Knife surgery for metastases to the brain. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery.

[86]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[87]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, PloS one.

[88]  D. Moher,et al.  Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[89]  K. H. Satyanarayana Rao,et al.  Informed Consent: An Ethical Obligation or Legal Compulsion? , 2008, Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery.

[90]  B. Lippitz,et al.  A simple dose gradient measurement tool to complement the conformity index. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[91]  R. J. Maciunas,et al.  Quality of coverage: Conformity measures for stereotactic radiosurgery , 2003, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[92]  I. Paddick.  A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[93]  Görkem Türkkan.  Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy in Threefraction Single-isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases , 2021, Turkish Journal of Oncology.

[94]  Jenghwa Chang,et al.  Restricted single isocenter for multiple targets dynamic conformal arc (RSIMT DCA) technique for brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. , 2018, Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT.

[95]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Defining the optimal planning target volume in image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: results of a randomized trial. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[96]  R. Popple,et al.  Feasibility of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple brain metastases. , 2010, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.