How Pennsylvania hospitals have responded to publicly released reports on coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND A Consumer Guide to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, published annually since 1992 by the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council, compares the outcomes and charges for the state's hospitals and surgeons providing this surgery. To determine whether performance data caused hospitals to change their policies and practices, hospitals were surveyed in Pennsylvania, where the state releases annual coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) outcomes data and, as a control, in New Jersey, where the state does not release these data. METHODS Key informants representing hospitals, health insurance payers, health maintenance organizations, and purchasers were asked to list specific changes made because of comparative performance data released in public reports. Focus groups were conducted and surveys were then developed and administered to samples of hospitals, payers, and purchasers in both states. RESULTS The results suggested, for example, that access to performance information encouraged hospitals to implement new approaches to marketing their CABG services. Thirty-eight percent of Pennsylvania CABG hospitals reported using performance information to recruit staff thoracic surgeons and residents, compared with none in New Jersey. For the most frequently initiated changes in patient care, the Pennsylvania hospitals depended on performance information released by a "government agency" to a much greater degree than did the hospitals in New Jersey. DISCUSSION The results suggest that public release of performance information has encouraged hospitals in Pennsylvania to make changes in the areas of marketing, governance, and clinical care and that the impact of the release of public data on performance was greater in Pennsylvania hospitals than New Jersey hospitals.

[1]  E J Topol,et al.  Outmigration for coronary bypass surgery in an era of public dissemination of clinical outcomes. , 1996, Circulation.

[2]  J. Hibbard,et al.  What Type of Quality Information do Consumers Want in a Health Care Report Card? , 1996, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[3]  A M Epstein,et al.  Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  W. Ghali,et al.  Statewide quality improvement initiatives and mortality after cardiac surgery. , 1997, JAMA.

[5]  R. Califf,et al.  Scorecard Cardiovascular Medicine: Its Impact and Future Directions , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  N. Wintfeld,et al.  Report cards on cardiac surgeons. Assessing New York State's approach. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Hm Krumholz Grading the Report Card. , 1998 .

[8]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Declines in Hospital Mortality Associated with a Regional Initiative to Measure Hospital Performance , 1997, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[9]  A. Epstein,et al.  Performance reports on quality--prototypes, problems, and prospects. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R. Brook Health Care Reform Is on the Way: Do We Want To Compete on Quality? , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  E. Hannan,et al.  The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. , 1995, JAMA.

[12]  E L Hannan,et al.  Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  A. Enthoven,et al.  A consumer-choice health plan for the 1990s. Universal health insurance in a system designed to promote quality and economy (2). , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.