Tailoring patients’ enrollment in ALS clinical trials: the effect of disease duration and vital capacity cutoffs

Abstract Objective: To evaluate how Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients’ mortality rates change, based on different levels of forced vital capacity (FVC) and disease duration, providing a scheme of mortality rates of a real population of ALS patients to improve the design of future RCTs. Methods: One random spirometry for each ALS patient was selected during four time intervals from disease onset: (1) ≤12 months; (2) ≤18 months; (3) ≤24 months; (4) ≤36 months. Date of spirometry corresponded to date of trial entry, while time interval onset-spirometry to disease duration at enrollment. Mortality rates from inclusion were computed at different time intervals. Based on progression rates, patients were stratified in slow, intermediate and fast progressors. Survival from recruitment was calculated depending on FVC, disease duration and progression rate. Results: We included 659 patients in group 1, 888 in group 2, 1019 in group 3 and 1102 in group 4. Mortality rates were higher in each group at reducing the FVC cutoff used for recruitment (p < 0.001). Median survival decreased when lowering FVC and disease duration cutoffs (p < 0.001); a higher median disease progression rate of included patients led to lower median survival from recruitment. The proportion of recruited fast progressors raised when shortening disease duration and lowering FVC cutoff. Conclusions: This is a simple model for setting eligibility criteria, based on mortality rates of patients depending on FVC and disease duration, to select the best population for RCTs, tailored to trials’ primary endpoints and duration.

[1]  O. Witte,et al.  Triage of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Application of the D50 Model , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  L. H. van den Berg,et al.  Current trends in the clinical trial landscape for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2020, Current opinion in neurology.

[3]  A. Chiò,et al.  Prognostic role of slow vital capacity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2020, Journal of Neurology.

[4]  A. Chiò,et al.  Disease-modifying therapies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2020, Neuropharmacology.

[5]  C. Mcdermott Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. , 2019, Current opinion in neurology.

[6]  A. Chiò,et al.  Masitinib as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial , 2019, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration.

[7]  A. Chiò,et al.  Revised Airlie House consensus guidelines for design and implementation of ALS clinical trials , 2019, Neurology.

[8]  M. Jaiswal,et al.  Riluzole and edaravone: A tale of two amyotrophic lateral sclerosis drugs , 2018, Medicinal research reviews.

[9]  Annelot M. Dekker,et al.  Prognosis for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: development and validation of a personalised prediction model , 2018, The Lancet Neurology.

[10]  Laurel Richardson,et al.  The Writing Group , 2018 .

[11]  Albert A. Taylor,et al.  Improved stratification of ALS clinical trials using predicted survival , 2018, Annals of clinical and translational neurology.

[12]  Y. Itoyama,et al.  Safety and efficacy of edaravone in well defined patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[13]  H. Mitsumoto,et al.  Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: why so many negative trials and how can trials be improved? , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  N. Nishimoto,et al.  Tocilizumab infusion therapy normalizes inflammation in sporadic ALS patients. , 2013, American journal of neurodegenerative disease.

[15]  K. Schulz,et al.  Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical , 2005, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Al-Chalabi,et al.  Early symptom progression rate is related to ALS outcome: a prospective population-based study. , 2002, Neurology.

[17]  M. Swash,et al.  El Escorial revisited: Revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2000, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron disorders : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology, Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[18]  L. Kux OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration , 2014 .

[19]  E. Beghi,et al.  Modeling drop-outs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. , 2012, Contemporary clinical trials.