Effects of Spokesperson Sex, Public Service Announcement Appeal, and Involvement on Evaluations of Safe-Sex PSAs

'This study tested the utility of the match-up hypothesis in creating effective safe-sex Public Service Announcements (PSAs). The match-up hypothesis predicts that mes- sages are more effective when there is consistency between spokespersons, issues, and message appeals. College students (N = 266) participated in a 2 x 2 x 2 (Appeal: Rational vs. Emotional x Spokesperson: Male vs. Female x Involvement: High vs. LOW) factorial design experiment. None of the study's hypotheses were supported. We did locate main effects for appeal (the rational appeal was generally more effective) and participant involvement (high-involvement participants generally found the PSAs more effective). There was a limited spokesperson gender and appeal interaction that was contrary to our hypotheses. The PSA using the female spokes- person in the rational appeal was associated with the most positive emotional attitudes, whereas the PSA using the female spokesperson in the emotional appeal was associated with the least favorable em...

[1]  Michael A. Kamins.  An Investigation into the “Match-up” Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty May Be Only Skin Deep , 1990 .

[2]  The Effects of Fear of AIDS and Gender on Responses to Fear‐Arousing Condom Advertisements , 1990 .

[3]  P. Homer,et al.  Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective , 1985 .

[4]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[5]  K. Witte.  Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) , 1994 .

[6]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Fear Appeals: Revisited and Revised , 1974 .

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[8]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[9]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[10]  L. Phillips,et al.  The persuasive effect of source credibility: a situational analysis. , 1978, Public opinion quarterly.

[11]  James Price Dillard,et al.  FRIENDLY OR UNFRIENDLY PERSUASION The Effects of Violations of Expectations by Males and Females , 1983 .

[12]  Sut Jhally,et al.  Social communication in advertising : persons, products & images of well-being , 1986 .

[13]  Lynn R. Kahle,et al.  Attitudes and social adaptation : a person-situation interaction approach , 1984 .

[14]  Robert E. Smith,et al.  The Role of Consumer Involvement in Determining Cognitive Response to Broadcast Advertising , 1991 .

[15]  Sally Jackson,et al.  GENERALIZING ABOUT MESSAGES: SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS , 1983 .

[16]  H. Leventhal,et al.  Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications , 1970 .

[17]  H. Simons,et al.  Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory. , 1970 .

[18]  S. B. Kenton.  Speaker Credibility in Persuasive Business Communication , 1989 .

[19]  K. Witte.  Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[20]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations , 1977 .

[21]  H. E. Krugman.  THE IMPACT OF TELEVISION ADVERTISING: LEARNING WITHOUT INVOLVEMENT , 1965 .

[22]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[23]  J. O. Whittaker.  SEX DIFFERENCES AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INTERPERSONAL PERSUASION. , 1965, The Journal of social psychology.

[24]  G. I. Schulman,et al.  SALIENCE PATTERNS, SOURCE CREDIBILITY, AND THE SLEEPER EFFECT , 1970 .

[25]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .

[26]  Gordon L. Patzer,et al.  Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness , 1983 .

[27]  R W Rogers,et al.  Fear appeals and attitude change: effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responses. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Douglas M. McLeod,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Public Affairs Knowledge , 1994 .

[29]  E. Maibach,et al.  Cognitive Responses to AIDS Information , 1990 .

[30]  L. Huddy,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates , 1993 .

[31]  Roobina Ohanian.  Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers' Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness , 1990 .

[32]  Robert D. Meade,et al.  Sex of the communicator as a variable in source credibility. , 1967, The Journal of social psychology.

[33]  Juliann Koch,et al.  Communicator Attractiveness and Expertise, Emotional Versus Rational Appeals, and Persuasion: A Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing Interpretation , 1983 .

[34]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[35]  Judging Masculine and Feminine Social Identities from Content-Controlled Speech , 1980 .

[36]  Marjorie J. Caballero,et al.  Selected Effects of Salesperson Sex and Attractiveness in Direct Mail Advertisements , 1984 .