Group theoretical approach to the configuration interaction and perturbation theory calculations for atomic and molecular systems

A formalism for an efficient generation of spin‐symmetry adapted configuration interaction (CI) matrices of the N‐electron atomic or molecular systems, described by nonrelativistic spin‐independent Hamiltonians, is presented. The Gelfand and Tsetlin canonical basis for the finite dimensional irreducible representations of the unitary groups is used as an N‐electron CI basis. A simplified Gelfand‐type pattern pertaining to the N‐electron problem is introduced, which considerably simplifies the canonical basis generation and, more importantly, the calculation of representation matrices of the (infinitesimal) generators of the pertinent unitary group in this basis. The calculation of the CI matrices for the above mentioned systems is then straightforward, since any particle number conserving operator may be written as a sum of n‐degree forms in the unitary group generators. The computation of CI matrices for various Hamiltonians as well as the problems of the space‐symmetry adaptation of the Gelfand‐Tsetlin ...

[1]  Canonical Definition of Wigner Coefficients in Un , 1967 .

[2]  A. Watt,et al.  Shell-Model and protected Hartree-Fock calculations for 24Mg, 28Si and 32S , 1972 .

[3]  T. Seligman,et al.  Group theory and second quantization for nonorthogonal orbitals , 1971 .

[4]  R. Mcweeny,et al.  Methods Of Molecular Quantum Mechanics , 1969 .

[5]  M. Moshinsky Group Theory and the Many Body Problem , 1968 .

[6]  J. Hubbard Electron correlations in narrow energy bands , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  W. E. Kammer,et al.  Combined SCF and CI Calculations for the Low‐Lying Rydberg and Valence Excited States of Ethylene , 1971 .

[8]  R. R. Whitehead,et al.  A numerical approach to nuclear shell-model calculations , 1972 .

[9]  V. Bargmann On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform part I , 1961 .

[10]  L. Cheung,et al.  IMPLEMENTING THE SAAP FORMALISM. I. SERBER-TYPE SPIN EIGENFUNCTIONS BY DIRECT DIAGONALIZATION. , 1972 .

[11]  H. Weyl The Classical Groups , 1940 .

[12]  小谷 正雄 Tables of molecular integrals , 1955 .

[13]  P. Löwdin Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I. Physical Interpretations by Means of Density Matrices, Natural Spin-Orbitals, and Convergence Problems in the Method of Configurational Interaction , 1955 .

[14]  A. Landé,et al.  Book Reviews: Quantum Mechanics; Perturbation Methods in the Quantum Mechanics of n-Electron Systems , 1951 .

[15]  Kurt Friedrichs,et al.  Mathematical Aspects of the Quantum Theory of Fields , 1954 .

[16]  R. Nesbet Algorithm for Diagonalization of Large Matrices , 1965 .

[17]  Jiri Patera,et al.  Complete sets of commuting operators and O (3) scalars in the enveloping algebra of SU (3) , 1974 .

[18]  J. Patera Electron g3 Configurations in LS Coupling , 1972 .

[19]  J. D. Louck,et al.  Recent Progress Toward a Theory of Tensor Operators in the Unitary Groups , 1970 .

[20]  R. Serber The Solution of Problems Involving Permutation Degeneracy , 1934 .

[21]  L. Pauling The calculation of matrix elements for Lewis electronic structures of molecules , 1933 .

[22]  F. Harris,et al.  Projection of Exact Spin Eigenfunctions , 1969 .

[23]  Ernest M. Loebl,et al.  Group theory and its applications , 1968 .

[24]  H. Weyl The Theory Of Groups And Quantum Mechanics , 1931 .