Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy

Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in waysthat are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.

[1]  G. William Domhoff,et al.  Who Rules America? , 2021 .

[2]  The Political Power of Economic Ideas , 2020 .

[3]  John L. Campbell.  Institutional Change and Globalization , 2020 .

[4]  Lucile Desmoulins.  French Public Policy Research Institutes and Their Political Impact as Another Illustration of the French Exception , 2017 .

[5]  A. Day.  Think Tanks in Western Europe , 2017 .

[6]  B. Carruthers.  The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. By John L. Campbell and Ove K. Pedersen. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2014. Pp. xx+401. $85.00 (cloth); $29.95 (paper). , 2015 .

[7]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective , 2015 .

[8]  H. Molotch.  Think Tanks in America , 2014 .

[9]  John L. Campbell,et al.  The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark , 2014 .

[10]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews , 2013 .

[11]  B. Carruthers.  Economists and Societies , 2012 .

[12]  M. Blyth.  Ideas, Uncertainty, and Evolution , 2010 .

[13]  D. Béland,et al.  Ideas and politics in social science research , 2010 .

[14]  K. Thelen,et al.  Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities and Change in France and Germany , 2010 .

[15]  M. Fourcade,et al.  Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s , 2009 .

[16]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy , 2008 .

[17]  V. Schmidt.  Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse , 2008 .

[18]  Simon Springer,et al.  A Brief History of Neoliberalism , 2007 .

[19]  James G. McGann.  Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[20]  C. Crouch.  The Futures of European Capitalism , 2004, Government and Opposition.

[21]  J. F. Rodriguez,et al.  CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE , 1608 .

[22]  M. Thunert.  Think tanks in Germany , 2004 .

[23]  Marion Fourcade-Gourinchas,et al.  The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  John L. Campbell.  Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy , 2002 .

[25]  C. Hay.  8. The "Crisis" of Keynesianism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Britain: An Ideational Institutionalist Approach , 2001 .

[26]  D. Shasha.  Who rules , 2001 .

[27]  M. Thunert.  Players Beyond Borders? German Think Tanks as Catalysts of Internationalisation , 2000 .

[28]  S. James.  Think Tanks across Nations , 1998 .

[29]  W. Streeck.  German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive? , 1997 .

[30]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment , 1996 .

[31]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[32]  V. Vanberg,et al.  Interests and Theories in Constitutional Choice , 1989 .

[33]  C. H. Uyehara.  The Social Democratic Movement , 1956 .

[34]  L. Fleischer.  Bringing The State Back In , 2016 .

[35]  O. K. Pedersen,et al.  Making Sense of Economic Uncertainty: Knowledge Regimes in the United States and Denmark , 2015 .

[36]  Ombajo Misava Edward,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing , 2015 .

[37]  Peter J. Katzenstein.  The Culture of National Security , 2013 .

[38]  Ulrich Ellwanger,et al.  The Theory of Fields , 2012 .

[39]  P. Pierson,et al.  The Transformation of American Politics , 2011 .

[40]  Martin Rhodes,et al.  Introduction: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism , 2007 .

[41]  L. Kenworthy.  Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance , 2006 .

[42]  R. Jessop.  Varieties of Capitalism. , 2006 .

[43]  C. Crouch.  Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs , 2005 .

[44]  Katherine V. W. Stone.  From Widgets to Digits: Introduction , 2004 .

[45]  D. Stone,et al.  Think tank traditions : policy research and politics of ideas , 2004 .

[46]  Y. Dezalay,et al.  The Internationalization of Palace Wars , 2002 .

[47]  S. Weber.  Globalization and the European political economy , 2001 .

[48]  David Soskice,et al.  An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[49]  R. Boyer.  French Statism at the Crossroads , 1997 .

[50]  P. Gourevitch.  Politics In Hard Times , 1986 .

[51]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[52]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[53]  John Zysman,et al.  Governments, markets, and growth , 1983 .

[54]  T. Dye,et al.  Who's Running America? , 1976 .

[55]  M. Quinzii,et al.  Reforming Capitalism , 2022 .