Rhythmic Temporal Structure at Encoding Enhances Recognition Memory

Presenting events in a rhythm has been shown to enhance perception and facilitate responses for stimuli that appear in synchrony with the rhythm, but little is known about how rhythm during encoding influences later recognition. In this study, participants were presented with images of everyday objects in an encoding phase before a recognition task in which they judged whether or not objects were previously presented. Blockwise, object presentation during encoding followed either a rhythmic (constant, predictable) or arrhythmic (random, unpredictable) temporal structure, of which participants were unaware. Recognition was greater for items presented in a rhythmic relative to an arrhythmic manner. During encoding, there was a differential neural activity based on memory effect with larger positivity for rhythmic over arrhythmic stimuli. At recognition, memory-specific ERP components were differentially affected by temporal structure: The FN400 old/new effect was unaffected by rhythmic structure, whereas the late positive component old/new effect was observed only for rhythmically encoded items. Taken together, this study provides new evidence that memory-specific processing at recognition is affected by temporal structure at encoding.

[1]  Michael E. Smith Neurophysiological Manifestations of Recollective Experience during Recognition Memory Judgments , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Benjamin J. Kraus,et al.  Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration , 2013, Neuron.

[4]  J. Ford,et al.  The relationship between P300 amplitude and regional gray matter volumes depends upon the attentional system engaged. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a from Visual Stimuli: Typicality, Task, and Topography , 2004, Brain Topography.

[6]  Shannon Tubridy,et al.  Medial temporal lobe contributions to episodic sequence encoding. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  Auditory rhythms entrain visual processes in the human brain: Evidence from evoked oscillations and event-related potentials , 2015, NeuroImage.

[8]  D. Montaldi,et al.  Expectation affects learning and modulates memory experience at retrieval , 2018, Cognition.

[9]  T. Curran,et al.  The electrophysiology of incidental and intentionalretrieval: erp old⧸new effects in lexical decision andrecognition memory , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[11]  A. Nobre,et al.  Temporal Expectation Enhances Contrast Sensitivity by Phase Entrainment of Low-Frequency Oscillations in Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[14]  David Friedman,et al.  ERPs during continuous recognition memory for words , 1990, Biological Psychology.

[15]  Alexander Jones,et al.  Temporal expectancies driven by self- and externally generated rhythms , 2017, NeuroImage.

[16]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Giovanni Mento,et al.  The role of the P3 and CNV components in voluntary and automatic temporal orienting: A high spatial-resolution ERP study , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[19]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[21]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Orienting Attention to Points in Time Improves Stimulus Processing Both within and across Modalities , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. VanRullen Perceptual Cycles , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  G. Karmos,et al.  Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection , 2008, Science.

[25]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Theta Phase Synchronization Is the Glue that Binds Human Associative Memory , 2017, Current Biology.

[26]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Declarative Memory. , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[27]  C Miniussi,et al.  Orienting attention in time. , 2001, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[28]  Björn Herrmann,et al.  Low-Frequency Neural Oscillations Support Dynamic Attending in Temporal Context , 2014 .

[29]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  Synergistic Effect of Combined Temporal and Spatial Expectations on Visual Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Orienting Attention in Time , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Expectation-Driven Changes in Cortical Functional Connectivity Influence Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Performance , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  S. Haegens,et al.  Rhythmic facilitation of sensory processing: A critical review , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[33]  D Friedman,et al.  Event‐related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[34]  Barbara L. Chalfonte,et al.  Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing : A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model By : , 2004 .

[35]  A. Nobre,et al.  Alpha Oscillations Related to Anticipatory Attention Follow Temporal Expectations , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Peter De Weerd,et al.  Learned interval time facilitates associate memory retrieval. , 2017, Learning & memory.

[37]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Entrainment of neural oscillations as a modifiable substrate of attention , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[40]  The effect of false memory on temporal perception , 2007, Psychological research.

[41]  R. Knight,et al.  Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[42]  M. Jones,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays , 2002, Psychological science.

[43]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Intersensory selective attention and temporal orienting operate in parallel and are instantiated in spatially distinct sensory and motor cortices , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[44]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  J. Jacobs Hippocampal theta oscillations are slower in humans than in rodents: implications for models of spatial navigation and memory , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  R. Proctor Recognition memory for pictures as a function of poststimulus interval: an empirical clarification of existing literature. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  An expectation-based memory deficit in aging , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Conceptual Priming and Familiarity: Different Expressions of Memory during Recognition Testing with Distinct Neurophysiological Correlates , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  D. Shanks,et al.  Can "pure" implicit memory be isolated? A test of a single-system model of recognition and repetition priming. , 2010, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[51]  Dinkar Sharma,et al.  Unintentional and Intentional Recognition Rely on Dissociable Neurocognitive Mechanisms , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Interfacing mind and brain: a neurocognitive model of recognition memory. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[53]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[54]  T. Curran,et al.  Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[55]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Context effects on familiarity are familiarity effects of context - an electrophysiological study. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[56]  D. Witherspoon,et al.  The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[57]  M. Rugg,et al.  Context Effects on the Neural Correlates of Recognition Memory An Electrophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[58]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[59]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  Flicker Regularity Is Crucial for Entrainment of Alpha Oscillations , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[60]  Emma V. Ward,et al.  Does study duration have opposite effects on recognition and repetition priming , 2017 .

[61]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[62]  A. Nobre,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  G. Novembre,et al.  Tagging the musical beat: Neural entrainment or event-related potentials? , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[65]  Peter Squire,et al.  When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: An event-related potential and dipole modeling study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[66]  Nicol S Harper,et al.  Temporal predictability enhances auditory detection. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  Beverly C. Butler,et al.  Inattentional blindness for ignored words: Comparison of explicit and implicit memory tasks , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[69]  Robert Egly,et al.  Chronometric evidence for entrained attention , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[70]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical entrainment: what we can learn from studying naturalistic speech perception , 2018, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.

[71]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to sequence retrieval: Schematic coding of temporal context in the neocortical recollection network , 2015, NeuroImage.

[72]  C Van Petten,et al.  Word repetition in amnesia. Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[73]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[74]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Single-Trial Phase Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in Sensory Regions Predicts Human Associative Memory Performance , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[76]  L. Davachi,et al.  Temporal Memory Is Shaped by Encoding Stability and Intervening Item Reactivation , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  C. Frith,et al.  Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. , 1999, Science.

[78]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Time to Go Our Separate Ways: Opposite Effects of Study Duration on Priming and Recognition Reveal Distinct Neural Substrates , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[79]  E L Wilding,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[80]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[81]  Luc H. Arnal,et al.  Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[82]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[83]  K. Paller,et al.  Observing the transformation of experience into memory , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[85]  A. Nobre,et al.  Temporal Expectation Improves the Quality of Sensory Information , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[86]  Simon Dennis,et al.  ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s) , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[87]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[88]  K Grune,et al.  Information processing in working memory and event-related brain potentials. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[89]  D. Friedman,et al.  An event-related potential study of encoding in young and older adults , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[90]  B. Hangya,et al.  Phase Entrainment of Human Delta Oscillations Can Mediate the Effects of Expectation on Reaction Speed , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[91]  Benedikt Zoefel,et al.  The Involvement of Endogenous Neural Oscillations in the Processing of Rhythmic Input: More Than a Regular Repetition of Evoked Neural Responses , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[92]  Catalin V. Buhusi,et al.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[93]  Saskia Haegens,et al.  Temporal expectations and neural amplitude fluctuations in auditory cortex interactively influence perception , 2016, NeuroImage.

[94]  Tim Curran,et al.  Picture Superiority Doubly Dissociates the ERP Correlates of Recollection and Familiarity , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[95]  Andrew P Yonelinas,et al.  Dissociating familiarity from recollection in human recognition memory: Different rates of forgetting over short retention intervals , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[96]  Galit Yovel,et al.  The Electrophysiological Signature of Remember–Know Is Confounded with Memory Strength and Cannot Be Interpreted as Evidence for Dual-process Theory of Recognition , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[97]  Zheng Zeng,et al.  Recognition Memory is Improved by a Structured Temporal Framework During Encoding , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[98]  F. Craik Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? , 2002, Memory.

[99]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[100]  Alexandra T. Keinath,et al.  Identical versus conceptual repetition FN400 and parietal old/new ERP components occur during encoding and predict subsequent memory , 2013, Brain Research.