Vector summation of end-point impedance in kinematically redundant manipulators

One way to control the mechanical interactions between a manipulator and its environment is by specifying the manipulator's end-point impedance. According to this view, the function of a controller is to determine the force that the controlled system should apply in response to an externally imposed state, i.e., to determine an output force field. The possibility of combining the output force fields generated by a number of separate controllers in order to approximate an arbitrary output field is considered for a kinematically redundant manipulator. The end-point force fields of a simulated kinematically redundant manipulator operated by a set of spring-link actuators is numerically derived. The results indicate that the linear superposition of end-point fields may provide a quite good approximation of the actual passive behavior. This offers a simple way for solving the ill-posed problems associated with the specification of end-point impedance fields in a kinematically redundant system.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[2]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  A task-space formulation of passive force control , 1991, Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[3]  J. Kelso,et al.  Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  Charles W. Wampler,et al.  Inverse kinematic functions for redundant manipulators , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[7]  T. Shamir,et al.  Repeatability of redundant manipulators: mathematical solution of the problem , 1988 .

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  An analysis of contact instability in terms of passive physical equivalents , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  John Baillieul,et al.  Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulators , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  F. A. Mussa-lvaldi,et al.  Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Resolved Motion Rate Control of Manipulators and Human Prostheses , 1969 .

[13]  N. Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control:An Approach to Manipulation,Parts I,II,III , 1985 .

[14]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Redundancy resolution of manipulators through torque optimization , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[16]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Transforming plans into actions by tuning passive behavior: a field-approximation approach , 1991, Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[17]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Integrable Solutions of Kinematic Redundancy via Impedance Control , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.