Interfaces in Heterogeneous Catalysts: Advancing Mechanistic Understanding through Atomic-Scale Measurements.

Developing novel catalysts with high efficiency and selectivity is critical for enabling future clean energy conversion technologies. Interfaces in catalyst systems have long been considered the most critical factor in controlling catalytic reaction mechanisms. Interfaces include not only the catalyst surface but also interfaces within catalyst particles and those formed by constructing heterogeneous catalysts. The atomic and electronic structures of catalytic surfaces govern the kinetics of binding and release of reactant molecules from surface atoms. Interfaces within catalysts are introduced to enhance the intrinsic activity and stability of the catalyst by tuning the surface atomic and chemical structures. Examples include interfaces between the core and shell, twin or domain boundaries, or phase boundaries within single catalyst particles. In supported catalyst nanoparticles (NPs), the interface between the metallic NP and support serves as a critical tuning factor for enhancing catalytic activity. Surface electronic structure can be indirectly tuned and catalytically active sites can be increased through the use of supporting oxides. Tuning interfaces in catalyst systems has been identified as an important strategy in the design of novel catalysts. However, the governing principle of how interfaces contribute to catalyst behavior, especially in terms of interactions with intermediates and their stability during electrochemical operation, are largely unknown. This is mainly due to the evolving nature of such interfaces. Small changes in the structural and chemical configuration of these interfaces may result in altering the catalytic performance. These interfacial arrangements evolve continuously during synthesis, processing, use, and even static operation. A technique that can probe the local atomic and electronic interfacial structures with high precision while monitoring the dynamic interfacial behavior in situ is essential for elucidating the role of interfaces and providing deeper insight for fine-tuning and optimizing catalyst properties. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) has long been a primary characterization technique used for studying nanomaterials because of its exceptional imaging resolution and simultaneous chemical analysis. Over the past decade, advances in STEM, that is, the commercialization of both aberration correctors and monochromators, have significantly improved the spatial and energy resolution. Imaging atomic structures with subangstrom resolution and identifying chemical species with single-atom sensitivity are now routine for STEM. These advancements have greatly benefitted catalytic research. For example, the roles of lattice strain and surface elemental distribution and their effect on catalytic stability and reactivity have been well documented in bimetallic catalysts. In addition, three-dimensional atomic structures revealed by STEM tomography have been integrated in theoretical modeling for predictive catalyst NP design. Recent developments in stable electronic and mechanical devices have opened opportunities to monitor the evolution of catalysts in operando under synthesis and reaction conditions; high-speed direct electron detectors have achieved sub-millisecond time resolutions and allow for rapid structural and chemical changes to be captured. Investigations of catalysts using these latest microscopy techniques have provided new insights into atomic-level catalytic mechanisms. Further integration of new microscopy methods is expected to provide multidimensional descriptions of interfaces under relevant synthesis and reaction conditions. In this Account, we discuss recent insights on understanding catalyst activity, selectivity, and stability using advanced STEM techniques, with an emphasis on how critical interfaces dictate the performance of precious metal-based heterogeneous catalysts. The role of extended interfacial structures, including those between core and shell, between separate phases and twinned grains, between the catalyst surface and gas, and between metal and support are discussed. We also provide an outlook on how emerging electron microscopy techniques, such as vibrational spectroscopy and electron ptychography, will impact future catalysis research.

[1]  R. Schlögl Heterogeneous catalysis. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[2]  J. Zuo,et al.  Interaction of nanometer-sized gold nanocrystals with rutile (110) surface steps revealed at atomic resolution , 2014 .

[3]  Gabor A. Somorjai,et al.  CO oxidation on PtSn nanoparticle catalysts occurs at the interface of Pt and Sn oxide domains formed under reaction conditions , 2014 .

[4]  J. Zuo,et al.  Direct observation of interfacial Au atoms on TiO₂ in three dimensions. , 2015, Nano letters.

[5]  S. Pennycook,et al.  Depth sectioning with the aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Tuncay Alan,et al.  In-situ TEM on (de)hydrogenation of Pd at 0.5-4.5 bar hydrogen pressure and 20-400°C. , 2012, Ultramicroscopy.

[7]  M. Haruta,et al.  Visualizing Gas Molecules Interacting with Supported Nanoparticulate Catalysts at Reaction Conditions , 2012, Science.

[8]  Jianbo Wu,et al.  Icosahedral platinum alloy nanocrystals with enhanced electrocatalytic activities. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  N. Shibata,et al.  Dynamics of annular bright field imaging in scanning transmission electron microscopy. , 2010, Ultramicroscopy.

[10]  M. S. Chen,et al.  The Structure of Catalytically Active Gold on Titania , 2004, Science.

[11]  Y. Ikuhara,et al.  Interface structures of gold nanoparticles on TiO2 (110). , 2009, Physical review letters.

[12]  S. Pennycook A Scan Through the History of STEM , 2011 .

[13]  J. Zuo,et al.  Equilibrium shapes and triple line energy of epitaxial gold nanocrystals supported on TiO2(110) , 2010 .

[14]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Effect of Strain on the Reactivity of Metal Surfaces , 1998 .

[15]  Michael F Toney,et al.  Lattice-strain control of the activity in dealloyed core-shell fuel cell catalysts. , 2010, Nature chemistry.

[16]  Tomoki Akita,et al.  Electron microscopy study of gold nanoparticles deposited on transition metal oxides. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  J. Nørskov,et al.  The Active Site of Methanol Synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 Industrial Catalysts , 2012, Science.

[18]  Peter A. Crozier,et al.  In situ and operando transmission electron microscopy of catalytic materials , 2015 .

[19]  T. Jacob,et al.  Structure of palladium nanoparticles under oxidative conditions. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[20]  Malcolm L. H. Green,et al.  Simultaneous atomic-resolution electron ptychography and Z-contrast imaging of light and heavy elements in complex nanostructures , 2016, Nature Communications.

[21]  D. Muller,et al.  Structurally ordered intermetallic platinum-cobalt core-shell nanoparticles with enhanced activity and stability as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. , 2013, Nature materials.

[22]  M. Chi,et al.  Surface faceting and elemental diffusion behaviour at atomic scale for alloy nanoparticles during in situ annealing , 2015, Nature Communications.

[23]  P. He,et al.  Ordered bilayer ruthenium–platinum core-shell nanoparticles as carbon monoxide-tolerant fuel cell catalysts , 2013, Nature Communications.

[24]  T. Akita,et al.  Low-temperature CO oxidation properties and TEM/STEM observation of Au/γ-Fe2O3 catalysts , 2015 .

[25]  G. Hutchings,et al.  Palladium-tin catalysts for the direct synthesis of H2O2 with high selectivity , 2016, Science.

[26]  Miaofang Chi,et al.  Design and synthesis of bimetallic electrocatalyst with multilayered Pt-skin surfaces. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  Abdullah M. Asiri,et al.  Synergistic geometric and electronic effects for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide using gold–copper bimetallic nanoparticles , 2014, Nature Communications.

[28]  T. Akita,et al.  Sequential HAADF-STEM observation of structural changes in Au nanoparticles supported on CeO2 , 2011 .

[29]  L. Marks,et al.  Oriented catalytic platinum nanoparticles on high surface area strontium titanate nanocuboids. , 2011, Nano letters.

[30]  Wenjie Shen,et al.  Stabilized gold nanoparticles on ceria nanorods by strong interfacial anchoring. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  R. Behm,et al.  Active oxygen on a Au/TiO2 catalyst: formation, stability, and CO oxidation activity. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[32]  A R Lupini,et al.  Rapid aberration measurement with pixelated detectors , 2016, Journal of microscopy.

[33]  R. Egerton,et al.  Mechanisms of radiation damage in beam‐sensitive specimens, for TEM accelerating voltages between 10 and 300 kV , 2012, Microscopy research and technique.

[34]  F. Tao,et al.  Atomic-Scale Observations of Catalyst Structures under Reaction Conditions and during Catalysis. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[35]  M. Chi,et al.  Palladium–platinum core-shell icosahedra with substantially enhanced activity and durability towards oxygen reduction , 2015, Nature Communications.

[36]  T. Akita,et al.  Analytical TEM observation of Au nano-particles on cerium oxide , 2006 .

[37]  Masatake Haruta,et al.  Catalysis of Gold Nanoparticles Deposited on Metal Oxides , 2002 .

[38]  M. Haruta,et al.  Stepwise displacement of catalytically active gold nanoparticles on cerium oxide. , 2013, Nano letters.

[39]  M. Malac,et al.  Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. , 2004, Micron.

[40]  Hong Yang,et al.  Platinum-based oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[41]  P. Crozier,et al.  Detection of water and its derivatives on individual nanoparticles using vibrational electron energy-loss spectroscopy. , 2016, Ultramicroscopy.