Review of Virtual Environment Studies on Social and Group Phenomena

This article provides a review of previously published studies on virtual environments (VEs), focusing especially on empirical articles on social and group phenomena in VEs and their methodological and theoretical trends. VEs can be defined as communication systems in which interactants share the same three-dimensional digital space and can navigate, manipulate objects, and interact with one another via avatars. When examining the methodological and theoretical choices of these studies, four trends could be identified that characterize group studies on VEs: (a) testing the applicability of real-life, social behavior norms in VEs, (b) a lack of work group studies using VEs, (c) the micro-level treatment of social and groups, and (d) a lack of covering theory. Propositions for future research are presented.

[1]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[2]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.

[3]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Leadership Efficacy and Women Leaders' Responses to Stereotype Activation , 2007 .

[4]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  Psychology in Organizations: The Social-Identity Approach , 2000 .

[5]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[6]  Anu Sivunen,et al.  Strengthening Identification with the Team in Virtual Teams: The Leaders' Perspective , 2006 .

[7]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[8]  Mark Heyward,et al.  From International to Intercultural , 2002 .

[9]  W. Diehl,et al.  Unintended Outcomes in Second Life: Intercultural Literacy and Cultural Identity in a Virtual World , 2008 .

[10]  C. Axtell,et al.  Virtual Teams: Collaborating across Distance , 2005 .

[11]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[12]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[13]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect , 2009, Commun. Res..

[14]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Virgins and Vamps: The Effects of Exposure to Female Characters’ Sexualized Appearance and Gaze in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2009 .

[15]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  Avatars in social media: Balancing accuracy, playfulness and embodied messages , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Cade McCall,et al.  What Can Virtual Reality Teach Us About Prosocial Tendencies in Real and Virtual Environments? , 2008 .

[17]  Nick Yee,et al.  The Demographics, Motivations, and Derived Experiences of Users of Massively Multi-User Online Graphical Environments , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[18]  Ann Lantz,et al.  Meetings in a distributed group of experts: Comparing face-to-face, chat and collaborative virtual environments , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments , 2002, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[20]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Small-Group Behavior in a Virtual and Real Environment: A Comparative Study , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[21]  Katrin Allmendinger,et al.  The Effects of Media Richness on Multilateral Negotiations in a Collaborative Virtual Environment , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[22]  M. Turk,et al.  Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments , 2005 .

[23]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Anyone Speak Spanish? , 2003, New Media & Society.

[24]  Marina Fiedler.  Cooperation in Virtual Worlds , 2009 .

[25]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Doron Friedman,et al.  Comparing Group Discussion in Virtual and Physical Environments , 2009, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[27]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Self-Representations in Immersive Virtual Environments 1 , 2008 .

[28]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Difference Between Being and Seeing: The Relative Contribution of Self-Perception and Priming to Behavioral Changes via Digital Self-Representation , 2009 .

[29]  John Bowlby,et al.  Attachment and Loss: Sadness and Depression , 1982 .

[30]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[31]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[32]  Ernan Haruvy,et al.  The Lab versus the Virtual Lab and Virtual Field - An Experimental Investigation of Trust Games with Communication , 2009 .

[33]  M. Riketta.  Organizational identification: A meta-analysis , 2005 .

[34]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[35]  C. Nass,et al.  When a Talking-Face Computer Agent Is Half-Human and Half-Humanoid: Human Identity and Consistency Preference. , 2007 .

[36]  Jorge Peña,et al.  The Priming Effects of Avatars in Virtual Settings , 2009, Commun. Res..

[37]  Hideyuki Nakanishi,et al.  FreeWalk: a social interaction platform for group behaviour in a virtual space , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  G. Bente,et al.  Avatar-Mediated Networking: Increasing Social Presence and Interpersonal Trust in Net-Based Collaborations , 2008 .

[39]  E. V. Schie,et al.  Foci and correlates of organizational identification , 2000 .

[40]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity theory and organizational processes , 2001 .

[41]  Marko Hakonen,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of identification with virtual teams: Structural characteristics and justice concerns , 2007 .

[42]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior , 2007 .

[43]  Smiljana Antonijevic,et al.  Information, Communication & Society , 2008 .

[44]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Mixed methods for mixed reality: understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds , 2008 .

[45]  L. Kohlberg.  The Psychology Of Moral Development , 1984 .

[46]  S. Koivisto,et al.  Antecedents of Identity in Virtual Teams , 2008 .

[47]  Eva-Lotta Sallnäs,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode on Social Presence, Virtual Presence, and Performance in Collaborative Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[48]  Kristine L. Nowak,et al.  Choose your "buddy icon" carefully: The influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  John C. Turner,et al.  Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories , 1999 .

[50]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Reality , 2009, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[51]  Alessandra Talamo,et al.  Strategic Identities in Cyberspace , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[52]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Effect of Behavioral Realism and Form Realism of Real-Time Avatar Faces on Verbal Disclosure, Nonverbal Disclosure, Emotion Recognition, and Copresence in Dyadic Interaction , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[53]  M. Hogg.  Group Cohesiveness: A Critical Review and Some New Directions , 1993 .

[54]  G. Drew Kessler,et al.  Leaving the World Behind: Supporting Group Collaboration Patterns in a Shared Virtual Environment for Product Design , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[55]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism , 2007 .

[56]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[57]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  What Immersive Virtual Environment Technology Can Offer to Social Cognition , 2002 .

[58]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  The self-protective and undermining effects of attributional ambiguity , 2007 .

[59]  Scott E. Caplan,et al.  Can You Hear Me Now? The Impact of Voice in an Online Gaming Community , 2007 .

[60]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[61]  Christian Rauh,et al.  The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[62]  Mike Fraser,et al.  (Im)materiality, Virtual Reality and Interaction: Grounding the ‘Virtual’ in Studies of Technology in Action , 2006 .

[63]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[64]  Jang-Han Lee,et al.  Implicit and explicit attitude dissociation in spontaneous deceptive behavior. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[65]  Wei Qiu,et al.  Cultural Differences in Morality in the Real and Virtual Worlds: A Comparison of Chinese and U.S. Youth , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[66]  R. Rice,et al.  New Media and Organizational Structuring , 2001 .

[67]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[68]  Kristine L. Nowak.  The Influence of Anthropomorphism and Agency on Social Judgment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[69]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[70]  Asimina Vasalou,et al.  Me, myself and I: The role of interactional context on self-presentation through avatars , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[71]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Task Performance, Head Movements, Subjective Report, Simulator Sickness, and Transformed Social Interaction in Collaborative Virtual Environments , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[72]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[73]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[74]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Impact of a Character Posture Model on the Communication of Affect in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[75]  Ilona Heldal,et al.  Cubes in the Cube: A Comparison of a Puzzle-Solving Task in a Virtual and a Real Environment , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[76]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Social Inhibition in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[77]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Virtual and Physical Environments , 2003 .

[78]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[79]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[80]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[81]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[82]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  Identity and Cooperative Behavior in Groups , 2001 .

[83]  J. Fleiss.  Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[84]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication , 2005 .