Foot and mouth disease model verification and 'relative validation' through a formal model comparison.

Researchers from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States collaborated to validate their foot and mouth disease models--AusSpread, InterSpread Plus and the North American Animal Disease Spread Model--in an effort to build confidence in their use as decision-support tools. The final stage of this project involved using the three models to simulate a number of disease outbreak scenarios, with data from the Republic of Ireland. The scenarios included an uncontrolled epidemic, and epidemics managed by combinations of stamping out and vaccination. The predicted numbers of infected premises, the duration of each epidemic, and the size of predicted outbreak areas were compared. Relative within-model between-scenario changes resulting from different control strategies or resource constraints in different scenarios were quantified and compared. Although there were differences between the models in absolute outcomes, between-scenario comparisons within each model were similar. In all three models, early use of ring vaccination resulted in the largest drop in number of infected premises compared with the standard stamping-out regimen. This consistency implies that the assumptions made by each of the three modelling teams were appropriate, which in turn serves to increase end-user confidence in predictions made by these models.

[1]  P. Diggle,et al.  Kernel estimation of relative risk , 1995 .

[2]  Martin L. Hazelton,et al.  sparr: Analyzing Spatial Relative Risk Using Fixed and Adaptive Kernel Density Estimation in R , 2011 .

[3]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[4]  M. G. Garner,et al.  Modelling the spread of foot-and-mouth disease in Australia. , 2005, Australian veterinary journal.

[5]  Nick Taylor,et al.  Review of the use of models in informing disease control policy development and adjustment. , 2003 .

[6]  I. A. Chaikovsky,et al.  Terminology for model credibility , 1979 .

[7]  M. Schoenbaum,et al.  Modeling alternative mitigation strategies for a hypothetical outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in the United States. , 2003, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[8]  M. Mourits,et al.  Epidemiological and economic modelling of classical swine fever: application to the 1997/1998 Dutch epidemic , 2004 .

[9]  David J. Thomson,et al.  The U.K. Met Office's Next-Generation Atmospheric Dispersion Model, NAME III , 2007 .

[10]  M. Rowland,et al.  Economic costs of the foot and mouth disease outbreak in the United Kingdom in 2001. , 2002, Revue scientifique et technique.

[11]  Tilman M. Davies,et al.  Inference Based on Kernel Estimates of the Relative Risk Function in Geographical Epidemiology , 2009, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[12]  R. Sanson.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR AN ANIMAL DISEASE EMERGENCY , 1993 .

[13]  L. Danon,et al.  Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[15]  Gunnar Abrahamson,et al.  Terminology for model credibility , 1980 .

[16]  A. Hill,et al.  The North American Animal Disease Spread Model: a simulation model to assist decision making in evaluating animal disease incursions. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[17]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Further studies to quantify the dose of natural aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus for pigs , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[18]  R L Sanson,et al.  A survey to investigate movements off sheep and cattle farms in New Zealand, with reference to the potential transmission of foot-and-mouth disease , 2005, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[19]  Carlos Borrego,et al.  Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XVII , 2006 .

[20]  R L Sanson,et al.  The epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease: implications for New Zealand. , 1994, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[21]  R L Sanson,et al.  A comparison of predictions made by three simulation models of foot-and-mouth disease , 2007, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[22]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation modelling and analysis , 1991 .