Controlled Sub-Nanometer Epitope Spacing in a Three-Dimensional Self-Assembled Peptide Hydrogel.

Cells in the body use a variety of mechanisms to ensure the specificity and efficacy of signal transduction. One way that this is achieved is through tight spatial control over the position of different proteins, signaling sequences, and biomolecules within and around cells. For instance, the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin presents RGDS and PHSRN sequences that synergistically bind the α5β1 integrin when separated by 3.2 nm but are unable to bind when this distance is >5.5 nm.1 Building biomaterials to controllably space different epitopes with subnanometer accuracy in a three-dimensional (3D) hydrogel is challenging. Here, we synthesized peptides that self-assemble into nanofiber hydrogels utilizing the β-sheet motif, which has a known regular spacing along the peptide backbone. By modifying specific locations along the peptide, we are able to controllably space different epitopes with subnanometer accuracy at distances from 0.7 nm to over 6 nm, which is within the size range of many protein clusters. Endothelial cells encapsulated within hydrogels displaying RGDS and PHSRN in the native 3.2 nm spacing showed a significant upregulation in the expression of the alpha 5 integrin subunit compared to those in hydrogels with a 6.2 nm spacing, demonstrating the physiological relevance of the spacing. Furthermore, after 24 h the cells in hydrogels with the 3.2 nm spacing appeared to be more spread with increased staining for the α5β1 integrin. This self-assembling peptide system can controllably space multiple epitopes with subnanometer accuracy, demonstrating an exciting platform to study the effects of ligand density and location on cells within a synthetic 3D environment.

[1]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Accessibility to the Fibronectin Synergy Site in a 3D Matrix Regulates Engagement of α 5β 1 versus α vβ 3 Integrin Receptors , 2006 .

[2]  E. Place,et al.  Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. , 2009, Nature materials.

[3]  E. Bakota,et al.  Self-assembly of multidomain peptides: balancing molecular frustration controls conformation and nanostructure. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  Jeremy M. Berg,et al.  Thermodynamic β -sheet propensities measured using a zinc-finger host peptide , 1993, Nature.

[5]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Fibronectins, their fibrillogenesis, and in vivo functions. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[6]  R. Chapman,et al.  Synthesis of Self-assembling Cyclic Peptide-polymer Conjugates using Click Chemistry , 2010 .

[7]  M. Levitt Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. , 1978, Biochemistry.

[8]  Jennifer A. Craig,et al.  Effect of linker and spacer on the design of a fibronectin-mimetic peptide evaluated via cell studies and AFM adhesion forces. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[9]  J. Hartgerink,et al.  Self-assembly of multidomain peptides: sequence variation allows control over cross-linking and viscoelasticity. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[10]  D. Schmidt,et al.  Monocyte activation in response to polyethylene glycol hydrogels grafted with RGD and PHSRN separated by interpositional spacers of various lengths. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  T. Barker,et al.  Utilizing Fibronectin Integrin-Binding Specificity to Control Cellular Responses. , 2015, Advances in wound care.

[12]  Kai Simons,et al.  Lipid Rafts As a Membrane-Organizing Principle , 2010, Science.

[13]  E. Goddard-Borger,et al.  An Efficient, Inexpensive, and Shelf‐Stable Diazotransfer Reagent: Imidazole‐1‐sulfonyl Azide Hydrochloride. , 2008 .

[14]  J. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[15]  S. Stupp,et al.  Tuning supramolecular rigidity of peptide fibers through molecular structure. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  A. Rich,et al.  Spontaneous assembly of a self-complementary oligopeptide to form a stable macroscopic membrane. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Lisa Pakstis,et al.  Responsive hydrogels from the intramolecular folding and self-assembly of a designed peptide. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  D. Mooney,et al.  Study on the potential of RGD- and PHSRN-modified alginates as artificial extracellular matrices for engineering bone , 2013, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[19]  Jeffrey R Capadona,et al.  Integrin specificity and enhanced cellular activities associated with surfaces presenting a recombinant fibronectin fragment compared to RGD supports. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  Matthew Pilarz,et al.  Controlling hydrogelation kinetics by peptide design for three-dimensional encapsulation and injectable delivery of cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  K. Shroff,et al.  Fibronectin-mimetic peptide-amphiphile nanofiber gels support increased cell adhesion and promote ECM production , 2010 .

[22]  S. Stupp,et al.  Bioactive DNA-Peptide Nanotubes Enhance the Differentiation of Neural Stem Cells Into Neurons , 2014, Nano letters.

[23]  V. Weaver,et al.  Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  R. Hynes,et al.  Endothelial α5 and αv integrins cooperate in remodeling of the vasculature during development , 2010, Development.

[25]  M. Persson,et al.  Nano-architectures by covalent assembly of molecular building blocks. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[26]  G. Seelig,et al.  Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[27]  J. Berg,et al.  Thermodynamic beta-sheet propensities measured using a zinc-finger host peptide. , 1993, Nature.

[28]  Ashley C. Brown,et al.  Guiding epithelial cell phenotypes with engineered integrin-specific recombinant fibronectin fragments. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[29]  Grigory Tikhomirov,et al.  DNA-based programming of quantum dot valency, self-assembly and luminescence. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[30]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  The effect on osteoblast function of colocalized RGD and PHSRN epitopes on PEG surfaces. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[31]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  The spatial structure of cell signaling systems , 2013, Physical biology.

[32]  Matthew Tirrell,et al.  Effect of RGD secondary structure and the synergy site PHSRN on cell adhesion, spreading and specific integrin engagement. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[33]  L. Langeberg,et al.  Signalling scaffolds and local organization of cellular behaviour , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[34]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  A structural model for force regulated integrin binding to fibronectin's RGD-synergy site. , 2002, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[35]  Christopher T. Johnson,et al.  Synthetic matrices reveal contributions of ECM biophysical and biochemical properties to epithelial morphogenesis , 2016, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  Arnauld Sergé,et al.  Signalling complexes and clusters: functional advantages and methodological hurdles , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[37]  J. Turnbull,et al.  Extracellular matrix and cell signalling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor. , 2011, The Journal of endocrinology.

[38]  Melissa A. Kinney,et al.  Engineering Three-Dimensional Stem Cell Morphogenesis for the Development of Tissue Models and Scalable Regenerative Therapeutics , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  B. Geiger,et al.  Supramolecular crafting of cell adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.