In Vitro Considerations to Support Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Drugs in Dry Powder Inhalers for Lung Diseases

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are used to deliver locally acting drugs (e.g., bronchodilators and corticosteroids) for treatment of lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) for DPI products is challenging, primarily due to an incomplete understanding of the relevance of drug concentrations in blood or plasma to equivalence in drug delivery to the local site(s) of action. Thus, BE of these drug/device combination products is established based on an aggregate weight of evidence, which utilizes in vitro studies to demonstrate equivalence of in vitro performance, pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies to demonstrate equivalence of systemic exposure, and pharmacodynamic and clinical endpoint studies to demonstrate equivalence in local action. This review discusses key aspects of in vitro studies in supporting the establishment of BE for generic locally acting DPI products. These aspects include comparability in device resistance and equivalence in in vitro testing for single inhalation (actuation) content and aerodynamic particle size distribution.

[1]  J. Staniforth,et al.  Interparticle forces in binary and ternary ordered powder mixes , 1982, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[2]  R. Djukanović,et al.  Alveolar tissue inflammation in asthma. , 1996, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[3]  Jolyon P Mitchell,et al.  Cascade impactors for the size characterization of aerosols from medical inhalers: their uses and limitations. , 2003, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[4]  J. Lammers,et al.  Optimal particle size for beta 2 agonist and anticholinergic aerosols in patients with severe airflow obstruction. , 1996, Thorax.

[5]  P. Stewart,et al.  Particle Interactions Involved in Aerosol Dispersion of Ternary Interactive Mixtures , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[6]  H. Schreier,et al.  Formulation and in vitro performance of liposome powder aerosols , 1993 .

[7]  G. Smaldone,et al.  Aerosolized protein delivery in asthma: gamma camera analysis of regional deposition and perfusion. , 2001, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[8]  P. Barnes,et al.  Autoradiographic visualization of beta-adrenoceptor subtypes in human lung. , 1985, The American review of respiratory disease.

[9]  S. Underwood,et al.  Effects of bronchodilator particle size in asthmatic patients using monodisperse aerosols. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  P. Barnes,et al.  Autoradiographic visualization of muscarinic receptor subtypes in human and guinea pig lung. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[11]  A. Hickey,et al.  Dry powder inhaler formulation. , 2005, Respiratory care.

[12]  O. Usmani,et al.  Regional Lung Deposition and Bronchodilator Response as a Function of β2-Agonist Particle Size , 2005 .

[13]  A. James,et al.  The distribution of eosinophils and lymphocytes in the large and small airways of asthmatics. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[14]  P. Hagedoorn,et al.  Inhalation characteristics and their effects on in vitro drug delivery from dry powder inhalers part 2: effect of peak flow rate (pifr) and inspiration time on the in vitro drug release from three different types of commercial dry powder inhalers , 1996 .

[15]  Hak-Kim Chan,et al.  In vitro/in vivo comparisons in pulmonary drug delivery. , 2008, Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery.

[16]  Peter R. Byron,et al.  Dose emissions from marketed dry powder inhalers , 1995 .

[17]  Lars Borgström,et al.  Dry-Powder Inhalers , 2001 .

[18]  H. Chrystyn The Diskus™: a review of its position among dry powder inhaler devices , 2007, International journal of clinical practice.

[19]  A. Hickey,et al.  Medical devices for the delivery of therapeutic aerosols to the lungs , 2005 .

[20]  A. Hickey,et al.  Physiology of the Airways , 2003, Pharmaceutical Inhalation Aerosol Technology.

[21]  E. Weibel Morphometry of the Human Lung , 1965, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  I. Gonda,et al.  Targeting by deposition , 1992 .

[23]  G. Rowley,et al.  Measurement of electrostatic charge decay in pharmaceutical powders and polymer materials used in dry powder inhaler devices. , 1998, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[24]  Pieter Zanen,et al.  The optimal particle size for parasympathicolytic aerosols in mild asthmatics , 1995 .

[25]  B. Meakin,et al.  Drug delivery characteristics of Bricanyl TurbohalerTM dry powder inhalers , 1995 .

[26]  I. Larson,et al.  Effect of carrier size on the dispersion of salmeterol xinafoate from interactive mixtures. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[27]  J. Lammers,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of inhaled monodisperse beclomethasone as a function of particle size. , 2007, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[28]  Anthony J. Hickey,et al.  Dispersion and Characterization of Pharmaceutical Dry Powder Aerosols , 1998 .

[29]  N Moore,et al.  Assessment of handling of inhaler devices in real life: an observational study in 3811 patients in primary care. , 2003, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[30]  A. Hickey,et al.  Effect of particle morphology on emitted dose of fatty acid-treated disodium cromoglycate powder aerosols. , 1997, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[31]  Pieter Zanen,et al.  The optimal particle size for β-adrenergic aerosols in mild asthmatics , 1994 .