Why patients visit their doctors: assessing the most prevalent conditions in a defined American population.

OBJECTIVE To describe the prevalence of nonacute conditions among patients seeking health care in a defined US population, emphasizing age, sex, and ethnic differences. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records linkage system was used to identify all residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, on April 1, 2009, who had consented to review of their medical records for research (142,377 patients). We then electronically extracted all International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes noted in the records of these patients by any health care institution between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. We grouped International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes into clinical classification codes and then into 47 broader disease groups associated with health-related quality of life. Age- and sex-specific prevalence was estimated by dividing the number of individuals within each group by the corresponding age- and sex-specific population. Patients within a group who had multiple codes were counted only once. RESULTS We included a total of 142,377 patients, 75,512 (53%) of whom were female. Skin disorders (42.7%), osteoarthritis and joint disorders (33.6%), back problems (23.9%), disorders of lipid metabolism (22.4%), and upper respiratory tract disease (22.1%, excluding asthma) were the most prevalent disease groups in this population. Ten of the 15 most prevalent disease groups were more common in women in almost all age groups, whereas disorders of lipid metabolism, hypertension, and diabetes were more common in men. Additionally, the prevalence of 7 of the 10 most common groups increased with advancing age. Prevalence also varied across ethnic groups (whites, blacks, and Asians). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest areas for focused research that may lead to better health care delivery and improved population health.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. , 2010, Health affairs.

[2]  R. Green,et al.  THE BURDEN OF ALLERGIC RHINITIS , 2005 .

[3]  B. Yawn,et al.  Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. , 2012, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  Miquel Porta,et al.  A Dictionary of Epidemiology , 2008 .

[5]  J. Whisnant,et al.  Accuracy of Hospital Discharge Abstracts for Identifying Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[6]  Allen W. Brown,et al.  Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury Across the Full Disease Spectrum: A Population-based Medical Record Review Study , 2011, Epidemiology.

[7]  William D. Marder,et al.  Multiple Chronic Conditions: Prevalence, Health Consequences, and Implications for Quality, Care Management, and Costs , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  C. Ko Actinic keratosis: facts and controversies. , 2010, Clinics in dermatology.

[9]  E. Kokmen,et al.  Incidence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a reanalysis of data from Rochester, Minnesota, 1975-1984. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  K. Saag,et al.  Estimated prevalence and patterns of presumed osteoporosis among older Americans based on Medicare data , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  Neil J Stone,et al.  Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines , 2004, Circulation.

[12]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  M. Blaiss Allergic rhinitis: Direct and indirect costs. , 2010, Allergy and asthma proceedings.

[14]  T. Hartert,et al.  The atopic march: what's the evidence? , 2009, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[15]  S. Grundy,et al.  Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. , 2004, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[16]  M. Sowers,et al.  The evolving role of obesity in knee osteoarthritis , 2010, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[17]  Nilay D Shah,et al.  Effect of multiple chronic conditions among working-age adults. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[18]  S. Bryan,et al.  Comparison of Stratified Primary Care Management for Low Back Pain with Current Best Practice (STarTBack): A Randomised Controlled Trial , 2013, physioscience.

[19]  Yuqing Zhang,et al.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. , 2013, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[20]  L. Akinbami,et al.  Asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality: United States, 2005-2009. , 2011, National health statistics reports.

[21]  Susan L. Moore,et al.  Nurse-run, telephone-based outreach to improve lipids in people with diabetes. , 2012, The American journal of managed care.

[22]  Norman L. Johnson,et al.  New developments in survey sampling , 1970 .

[23]  M Susan Ridgely,et al.  The PROMETHEUS bundled payment experiment: slow start shows problems in implementing new payment models. , 2011, Health affairs.

[24]  B. Mukherjee,et al.  A new comorbidity index: the health-related quality of life comorbidity index. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  J. Garrett,et al.  The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  N. Keenan,et al.  Prevalence of hypertension and controlled hypertension - United States, 2005-2008. , 2011, MMWR supplements.

[27]  R. Deyo,et al.  Back Pain Prevalence and Visit Rates: Estimates From U.S. National Surveys, 2002 , 2006, Spine.

[28]  G. Anderson,et al.  Out-of-pocket medical spending for care of chronic conditions. , 2001, Health affairs.

[29]  B. Yawn,et al.  Coronary disease surveillance in Olmsted County objectives and methodology. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  Olga V. Demler,et al.  Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[31]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  B. Yawn,et al.  American Journal of Epidemiology Practice of Epidemiology Comparing Shingles Incidence and Complication Rates from Medical Record Review and Administrative Database Estimates: How Close Are They? , 2022 .

[33]  N. Mantel,et al.  On epidemiologic surveys. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  N F de Keizer,et al.  Teledermatology applied following patient selection by general practitioners in daily practice improves efficiency and quality of care at lower cost , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[35]  B. Yawn,et al.  American Journal of Epidemiology Practice of Epidemiology Use of a Medical Records Linkage System to Enumerate a Dynamic Population over Time: the Rochester Epidemiology Project , 2022 .

[36]  W. Katon,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Archives of general psychiatry.

[37]  L. Melton,et al.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. , 1996, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[38]  K. Bailey,et al.  Identifying In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): A Comparison of Claims-Based Approaches With the Rochester Epidemiology Project VTE Cohort , 2008, Medical care.