An analysis of reaching movements in manipulation of constrained dynamic objects

Constrained human movements are considered in this paper. The external constraints decrease the mobility of the human arm and lead to the redundancy in the distribution of the interaction force between the arm joints. To investigate the trajectory formation in the constrained human movements, we first develop a novel experimental system with interchangeable geometric constraints. Then, we examine the trajectory of human arm for an elliptic constraint. To clarify the trajectory formation in constrained point-to-point motions, we analyze experimental data and test them against predictions obtained by conventional criteria of optimality. It is found in the comparative analysis that the best prediction is given by the minimum muscle force change criterion.

[1]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Impedance Regulation in Human Movements During a Rotation Task , 1991, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[2]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study , 1995, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  E. Polak,et al.  Amatlab Toolbox for Solving Optimal Control Problems , 1997 .

[4]  John M. Holerbach Planning of arm movements , 1990 .

[5]  S. Yamada,et al.  Human skill analysis based on multisensory data , 1997, Proceedings 6th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'97 SENDAI.

[6]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Dealing with constraints: a biomechanical approach , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[9]  M I Lipshits,et al.  Measurements of human force control during a constrained arm motion using a force-actuated joystick. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Y Uno,et al.  Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Motion Guides for Assisted Manipulation , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Optimization principles in motor control , 1998 .

[17]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Two-arm trajectory planning in a manipulation task , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  R Osu,et al.  Possible explanations for trajectory curvature in multijoint arm movements. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[20]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  John T. McConville,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF INERTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1975 .

[22]  Zhiwei Luo,et al.  On the dynamic version of the minimum hand jerk criterion , 2004, IROS.