Extending the concept of social validity: behavior analysis for disease prevention and health promotion.

A broader definition of social validity is proposed wherein a socially valid behavior-change intervention is directed to a problem of verifiable importance, the intervention is valued and used appropriately by designated target groups, and the intervention as used has sufficient behavioral impact to substantially reduce the probability of the problem's occurrence in target populations. The verifiable importance of a problem is based on epidemiological data, and the value and appropriate use of an intervention are enhanced through the use of conceptual frameworks for social marketing and behavior change and considerable formative and pilot research. Behavioral impact is assessed through efficacy and effectiveness studies. Thus, the social validity of a behavior-change intervention is established through a number of interactive, a priori steps. This approach to defining social validity is related to critical analysis and intervention issues including individual and population perspectives and "top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches to intervention design. This broader definition of social validity is illustrated by a project to reduce the risk of HIV infection among adolescents. Although the various steps involved in creating socially valid interventions can be complicated, time-consuming, and expensive, following all the steps can result in interventions capable of improving a nation's health.

[1]  R. Jeffery Risk behaviors and health. Contrasting individual and population perspectives. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[2]  M. Wolf,et al.  Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  Abraham Wandersman,et al.  A Framework of Participation in Community Organizations , 1981 .

[4]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[5]  M. Effron,et al.  Exercise training combined with antihypertensive drug therapy. Effects on lipids, blood pressure, and left ventricular mass. , 1990, JAMA.

[6]  M. Thornquist,et al.  Types of dietary fat and the incidence of cancer at five sites. , 1990, Preventive medicine.

[7]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Applied Behavior Analysis and Social Marketing: An Integration for Environmental Preservation , 1989 .

[8]  R S Paffenbarger,et al.  Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. , 1989, JAMA.

[9]  A. King,et al.  Conceptual and strategic foundations for effective media campaigns for preventing the spread of HIV infection , 1990 .

[10]  S B Stolz,et al.  Adoption of innovations from applied behavioral research: "Does anybody care?". , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  W L Haskell,et al.  Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City Project. , 1990, JAMA.

[12]  M. Moskowitz,et al.  Feasibility of a randomized trial of a low-fat diet for the prevention of breast cancer: dietary compliance in the Women's Health Trial Vanguard Study. , 1990, Preventive medicine.

[13]  J. Freudenheim,et al.  Diet and coronary heart disease risk factors in a population with varied intake. The Research Group ATS-RF2 of The Italian National Research Council. , 1990, Preventive medicine.

[14]  R. Paffenbarger,et al.  Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J F Sallis,et al.  Identifying correlates of walking for exercise: an epidemiologic prerequisite for physical activity promotion. , 1989, Preventive medicine.