Effective connectivity anomalies in human amblyopia

We investigate the effective connectivity in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex of humans with amblyopia. Six amblyopes participated in this study. Standard retinotopic mapping stimuli were used to define the boundaries of early visual cortical areas. We obtained fMRI time series from thalamic, striate and extrastriate cortical regions for the connectivity study. Thalamo-striate and striate-extrastriate networks were constructed based on known anatomical connections and the effective connectivities of these networks were assessed by means of a nonlinear system identification method. The effective connectivity of all networks studied was reduced when driven by the amblyopic eye, suggesting contrary to the current single-cell model of localized signal reduction, that a significant part of the amblyopic deficit is due to anomalous interactions between cells in disparate brain regions. The effective connectivity loss was unrelated to the fMRI loss but correlated with the degree of amblyopia (ipsilateral LGN to V1 connection), suggesting that it may be a more relevant measure. Feedforward and feedback connectivities were similarly affected. A hemispheric dependence was found for the thalamo-striate feedforward input that was not present for the feedback connection, suggesting that the reduced function of the LGN recently found in amblyopic humans may not be solely determined by the feedback influence from the cortex. Both ventral and dorsal connectivities were reduced.

[1]  J. Haselgrove,et al.  Decreased Activation of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in a Patient with Anisometropic Amblyopia Demonstrated by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, Ophthalmologica.

[2]  I. J. Leontaritis,et al.  Input-output parametric models for non-linear systems Part II: stochastic non-linear systems , 1985 .

[3]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Positron-emission tomographic study of human amblyopia with use of defined visual stimuli. , 1997, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  Ki H. Chon,et al.  Application of fast orthogonal search to linear and nonlinear stochastic systems , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Cerebral correlates of impaired grating perception in individual, psychophysically assessed human amblyopes , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Movshon,et al.  Sensitivity to visual motion in amblyopic macaque monkeys , 2006, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analyzing effective connectivity with functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[10]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  Cortical deficits in human amblyopia: their regional distribution and their relationship to the contrast detection deficit. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  W. Singer,et al.  Processing deficits in primary visual cortex of amblyopic cats. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Crewther,et al.  Cat-301 immunoreactivity in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex of the strabismic amblyopic cat. , 1997, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  Testing autocorrelation in a system perspective testing autocorrelation , 1999 .

[15]  N. Volkow,et al.  Imaging of cerebral blood flow and metabolism in amblyopia by positron emission tomography. , 1988, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Deficient responses from the lateral geniculate nucleus in humans with amblyopia , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  R. W. Guillery,et al.  Evidence that binocular competition affects the postnatal development of Y-cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus , 1975, Brain Research.

[18]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[20]  J. Mendola,et al.  Monocular activation of V1 and V2 in amblyopic adults measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[21]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  A step-down multiple hypotheses testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence , 1999 .

[22]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The amblyopic deficit for global motion is spatial scale invariant , 2008, Vision Research.

[23]  Jurgen A. Doornik,et al.  Testing Vector Error Autocorrelation and Heteroscedasticity , 1996 .

[24]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Visual response properties of neurons in the LGN of normally reared and visually deprived macaque monkeys. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia , 2003, Vision Research.

[26]  B. Mansouri,et al.  The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[27]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The influences of visibility and anomalous integration processes on the perception of global spatial form versus motion in human amblyopia , 2005, Vision Research.

[28]  R F Hess,et al.  The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Habib Benali,et al.  A nonlinear identification method to study effective connectivity in functional MRI , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[30]  L. Kabasakal,et al.  Brain SPECT evaluation of the visual cortex in amblyopia. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  K Ugurbil,et al.  Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high‐field NMR , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri , 2022 .

[34]  W. Singer,et al.  Ocular dominance in extrastriate cortex of strabismic amblyopic cats , 2002, Vision Research.

[35]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Engle.  Wald, likelihood ratio, and Lagrange multiplier tests in econometrics , 1984 .

[37]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Binocular interactions in striate cortical neurons of cats reared with discordant visual inputs , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Billings,et al.  Fast orthogonal identification of nonlinear stochastic models and radial basis function neural networks , 1996 .

[39]  M. Crawford,et al.  The lateral geniculate nucleus in human strabismic amblyopia. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  Jan F. Kiviet,et al.  On the Rigour of Some Misspecification Tests for Modelling Dynamic Relationships , 1986 .

[41]  H. Ikeda,et al.  Loss of spatial resolution of lateral geniculate nucleus neurones in kittens raised with convergent squint produced at different stages in development , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[43]  S. Ogawa.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-dependent oxygenation , 1990 .

[44]  Sheng Chen,et al.  Orthogonal least squares methods and their application to non-linear system identification , 1989 .