Evidence mapping and overview of systematic reviews of the effects of acupuncture therapies

Objective To provide a route map regarding systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture therapies that will meet two goals: (1) to identify areas in which more or better evidence is required and (2) to identify acupuncture applications that, although proven effective, remain underused in practice, and thus warrant more effective knowledge dissemination. Eligibility criteria We included SRs that conducted meta-analyses (MAs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for this overview. Information sources We searched for SRs without language restrictions from January 2015 to November 2020 in four Chinese electronic databases and Epistemonikos database. And we also searched for newly published RCTs that were eligible for selected best SRs in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and four Chinese electronic databases from its lasted search dates to November 2020. Synthesis of results We reanalysed the selected MAs if new primary studies were added. We used random-effect model to calculate the overall effect. Results Our search identified 120 SRs published in the last 5 years addressing acupuncture therapies across 12 therapeutic areas and 77 diseases and conditions. The SRs included 205 outcomes and involved 138 995 participants from 1402 RCTs. We constructed 77 evidence matrices, including 120 SRs and their included RCTs in the Epistemonikos database. Seventy-seven SRs represented the effect estimate of acupuncture therapies. Finally, we system summarised the areas of possible underutilisation of acupuncture therapies (high or moderate certainty evidence of large or moderate effects), and the areas of warranting additional investigation of acupuncture therapies (low or very low certainty evidence of moderate or large effects). Conclusion The evidence maps and overview of SRs on acupuncture therapies identified both therapies with substantial benefits that may require more assertive evidence dissemination and promising acupuncture therapies that require further investigation.

[1]  Mark I. Johnson,et al.  Acupuncture for the Relief of Chronic Pain: A Synthesis of Systematic Reviews , 2019, Medicina.

[2]  Jie Zhang,et al.  A Network Pharmacology Approach to Uncover the Potential Mechanism of Yinchensini Decoction , 2018, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[3]  F. Liang,et al.  Acupuncture for Primary Dysmenorrhea: An Overview of Systematic Reviews , 2018, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[4]  Hao-min Cheng,et al.  Acupressure effect on sleep quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, Sleep medicine reviews.

[5]  H. White,et al.  Evidence and gap maps: a comparison of different approaches , 2018, Campbell systematic reviews.

[6]  P. Tugwell,et al.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[7]  Jianpin Liu,et al.  Publication Trends in Acupuncture Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on PubMed , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  S. McDonough,et al.  Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews , 2015, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[9]  E. Yeoh,et al.  Views on traditional Chinese medicine amongst Chinese population: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[10]  Jason Jishun Hao,et al.  Acupuncture: Past, Present, and Future , 2014, Global advances in health and medicine.

[11]  M. Lee,et al.  Acupuncture for surgical conditions: an overview of systematic reviews , 2014, International journal of clinical practice.

[12]  Emma Tavender,et al.  The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[13]  S. Haque Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the East London and City Health Authority Ethic Committee. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. , 2011 .

[14]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[15]  G. Guyatt,et al.  LOST to follow-up Information in Trials (LOST-IT): a protocol on the potential impact , 2009, Trials.