A comparison of volumetric and dynamic CO2 storage resource and efficiency in deep saline formations

Abstract A reliable carbon dioxide (CO2) storage resource estimation method is crucial if carbon capture and storage in deep saline formations (DSFs) is to gain widespread deployment for reducing anthropogenic CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. Most of the published methodologies are based on a volumetric calculation and do not consider the effect of site-specific dynamic factors (e.g., injection rate, pressure interference). Several studies suggest these dynamic components may play the dominant role in storing CO2 in DSFs. In this study, CO2 storage resource estimates and efficiencies for two deep saline systems were calculated using volumetric and dynamic methodologies. Comparison of the results indicates that dynamic CO2 storage efficiency is time-dependent. For short injection lengths (∼50 years), an open system has an efficiency similar to a closed system, and volumetric storage resource estimates are too high. For long injection time frames (∼2000 years), the dynamic storage resource of open systems approaches the volumetric potential. These results suggest that volumetric assessments are reliable provided it is understood that it may take hundreds of wells and/or injection for hundreds of years to reach a formation's effective CO2 storage resource potential. Additionally, operational factors such as water extraction can increase CO2 storage resource and efficiency.

[1]  Keni Zhang,et al.  CO2 Plume Evolution and Pressure Buildup of Large-scale CO2 Injection into Saline Aquifers in Sanzhao Depression, Songliao Basin, China , 2012, Transport in Porous Media.

[2]  Lincoln Paterson,et al.  Role of Convective Mixing in the Long-Term Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Deep Saline Formations , 2005 .

[3]  Roger A. Chadwick,et al.  The impact of boundary conditions on CO2 storage capacity estimation in aquifers , 2011 .

[4]  James Craig,et al.  A comparison of volumetric and dynamic storage efficiency in deep saline reservoirs: An overview of IEAGHG study IEA/CON/13/208☆ , 2014 .

[5]  J. Birkholzer,et al.  Basin-scale hydrogeologic impacts of CO2 storage: Capacity and regulatory implications , 2009 .

[6]  E. Lindeberg,et al.  Upscaling studies of diffusion induced convection in homogeneous and heterogeneous aquifers , 2011 .

[7]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  CO2 storage capacity estimation: Issues and development of standards , 2007 .

[8]  Dong Liu,et al.  Flue gas enhanced oil recovery (EOR) as a high efficient development technology for offshore heavy oil in China , 2013 .

[9]  Leslie F. Ruppert,et al.  A Probabilistic Assessment Methodology for the Evaluation of Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage , 2010 .

[10]  James A. Sorensen,et al.  Development of Storage Coefficients for Determining the Effective CO2 Storage Resource in Deep Saline Formations , 2009 .

[11]  Jianhui Zeng,et al.  Non-Darcy flow in oil accumulation (oil displacing water) and relative permeability and oil saturation characteristics of low-permeability sandstones , 2010 .

[12]  C. L. Brady,et al.  A Comparison of Forecast and Actual Production after a Decade of Field Operations in the Alpha Unit Polymer-Augmented Waterflood , 1998 .

[13]  S. Thibeau,et al.  Have We Overestimated Saline Aquifer CO2 Storage Capacities , 2011 .

[14]  H. Herzog,et al.  Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  C. Ehlig-Economides,et al.  Sequestering carbon dioxide in a closed underground volume , 2010 .

[16]  Jean-Philippe Nicot,et al.  Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin , 2008 .

[17]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  CO2 storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps , 2007 .

[18]  C. Tsang,et al.  A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations , 2008 .