Post-Training Discrete-Trial Teaching Performance by Instructors of Young Children with Autism in Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention.

The current study examined instructors' discrete-trial teaching responses after a performance-based training procedure in which instructors were required to demonstrate criterion-level performance on written and oral quizzes and on performance demonstrations. Twelve discrete-trial teaching responses were labeled and operationally defined. Post-training measures of the target responses were obtained during home-based early intervention teaching sessions with young children with autism. The director provided discrete-trial performance feedback to the instructor after each session. Mean accuracy of performance for the instructors was 92% or above across 10 sessions. These data were contrasted with the substantially lower levels of accuracy from normative data of instructors conducting sessions in a comparable setting. These data suggest the importance of requiring criterion-level performance during training. Keywords: autism; discrete-trial teaching; early intensive behavioral intervention; staff training. ********** The purpose of the current study was to examine instructors' discrete-trial teaching performance with young children with autism after a training procedure that included a stringent accuracy criterion was implemented. Training to criterion is not typically established in the staff training literature (Matson, 1990). Discrete-trial teaching is an instructional method that incorporates the principles of applied behavior analysis by breaking down complex tasks into small units and presenting them in a simplified, repeated manner to facilitate learning (Green, 1996; Newman, Reeve, Reeve, & Ryan, 2003; Sarokoff & Sturmey, 2004; Sundberg & Partington, 1998). Discrete-trial teaching is used to: (a) allow data collection and assessment of learner and instructor behavior, (b) clarify what is expected of the learner and instructor, and (c) maintain consistent teaching conditions and requirements. Green (1996) and Smith (2001) noted that discrete-trial teaching is an effective strategy for teaching new skills with children with autism. In the present study, instructors were trained to emit discrete-trial teaching responses using staff training procedures established and accepted in the literature, including verbal, written, and video instructions; modeling; role-playing; in-vivo practice; and performance feedback (Gardner, 1972; Gladstone & Spencer, 1979; Harris, Bushell, Sherman, & Kane 1975; Johnson & Fawcett, 1994; Kazdin & Moyer, 1976; Kissel, Whitman, & Reid, 1983; Koegel, Russo, & Rincover, 1977; Reid & Green, 1990, Sepler & Meyers, 1978). Following training, accuracy of discrete-trial teaching behavior was assessed during home-based teaching sessions for young children with autism. Feedback for teaching performance was presented following each teaching session during the Post-training phase. Method Participants Three special education instructors (22 to 45 years old) of children with autism participated in the study. All participants were informed of the nature of their participation and provided consent for their participation. The instructors were employed through an early intensive behavioral intervention agency that served children with autism and their families. The instructors were not previously trained in using behavior analytic methods. The children served by the agency were 2 to 3 years old, and were diagnosed with an autistic-spectrum disorder, as documented by a physician and psychologist. For purposes of the current study, two male children with autism were involved during instructor training sessions. Each child was allotted 20 hours/week of behavior analytic services delivered by special educators. Setting The study took place in the urban homes of children participating in a home-based early intensive behavioral intervention program for children with autism. The areas of the homes used during teaching sessions were arranged prior to conducting teaching sessions. …

[1]  B. Gladstone,et al.  The effects of modelling on the contingent praise of mental retardation counsellors. , 1977, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

[2]  J. M. Gardner.  Teaching behavior modification to nonprofessionals. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  E Shafer,et al.  A Review of Sundberg and Partington’s Teaching Language to Children with Autism or Other Developmental Disabilities , 1999, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[4]  A. Kazdin.  Training Teachers to Use Behavior Modification. , 1977 .

[5]  W V Welsch,et al.  Effects of feedback on daily completion of behavior modification projects. , 1973, Mental retardation.

[6]  M. B. Parsons,et al.  Training basic teaching skills to community and institutional support staff for people with severe disabilities: a one-day program. , 1996, Research in developmental disabilities.

[7]  D M Baer,et al.  Training parents as behavior modifiers: self-recording of contingent attention. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  Judith K. Carlson,et al.  Teaching Children with Autism , 1996 .

[9]  S. Kontos,et al.  Using a Pyramid Model to Teach Behavior Management Procedures to Childcare Providers , 1992 .

[10]  P. Sturmey,et al.  The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete-trial teaching. , 2004, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  B. Hart,et al.  Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. , 1975, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  W. Hay,et al.  The use of teachers as behavioral observers. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  S. Harris.  Educational Strategies in Autism , 1995 .

[14]  B. L. Hopkins,et al.  Use of behavioral techniques by paraprofessional staff: A review and proposal , 1989 .

[15]  R. C. Katz,et al.  Modifying the dispensing of reinforcers: Some implications for behavior modification with hospitalized patients , 1972 .

[16]  D. Reid,et al.  An institutional staff training and self-management program for developing multiple self-care skills in severely/profoundly retarded individuals. , 1983, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[17]  P. J. Krantz,et al.  A modified incidental-teaching procedure for autistic youth: acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. , 1983, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  D Douglas Depew,et al.  Staff training. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  B. Hart,et al.  In vivo language intervention: unanticipated general effects. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  E. Blanchard,et al.  The effect of the absence of close supervision on the use of response cost in a prison token economy. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[21]  R. Fleming,et al.  Training Supervisors to Train Staff , 1996 .

[22]  E. Errickson,et al.  Modification of Staff Behavior: A Brief Note. , 1971 .

[23]  R. Koegel,et al.  Assessing and training teachers in the generalized use of behavior modification with autistic children. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[24]  C. Cullen.  A Review of Staff Training: The Emperor’s Old Clothes , 1988 .

[25]  Tristram Smith,et al.  Discrete Trial Training in the Treatment of Autism , 2001 .

[26]  P. J. Krantz,et al.  The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[27]  Realon Re,et al.  Verbal feedback vs. verbal feedback plus praise: the effects on direct care staff's training behaviors. , 1983 .

[28]  Richard W. Malott,et al.  The Effects of Modeling and Immediate and Delayed Feedback in Staff Training , 1980 .

[29]  Lucius Arco.  Effects of outcome performance feedback on maintenance of client and staff behavior in a residential setting , 1991 .

[30]  O. I. Lovaas,et al.  Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. , 1993, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[31]  P. J. Krantz,et al.  Parents as therapists for autistic children: A model for effective parent training , 1982 .

[32]  H. R. Quilitch,et al.  A comparison of three staff-management procedures. , 1975, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[33]  D. Altus,et al.  A technology for program maintenance: programming key researcher behaviors in a student housing cooperative. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[34]  D. Reid,et al.  Improving the Functional Utility and Effectiveness of Classroom Services for Students with Profound Multiple Handicaps , 1986 .

[35]  H. J. Sepler,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VERBAL INSTRUCTION ON TEACHING BEHAVIOR‐MODIFICATION SKILLS TO NONPROFESSIONALS1 , 1978 .

[36]  B. Hart,et al.  Using preschool materials to modify the language of disadvantaged children. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[37]  James A. Sherman,et al.  INSTRUCTIONS, FEEDBACK, PRAISE, BONUS PAYMENTS, AND TEACHER BEHAVIOR1 , 1975 .

[38]  M Panyan,et al.  Feedback to attendants as a reinforcer for applying operant techniques. , 1970, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  S. Fawcett,et al.  Courteous service: Its assessment and modification in a human service organization. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.