Compensation Strategies Used by High-Ability Students With Learning Disabilities who Succeed In College

To investigate how high-ability students With learning disabilities succeed in postsecondary academic environments, 12 young adults with disabilities who were successful at the university level were studied. Extensive interviews with these young adults provided examples of the problems faced by high-ability students with learning disabilities, as well as the specific compensation strategies the used to address and overcome these problems. Four of the participants had been identified as having a learning disability in elementary school; six were identified in junior or senior high school; and two were not diagnosed until college. The participants believed that having a learning disability was considered by elementary or secondary school personnel as synonymous with below-average ability. They reported that content remediation, rather than instruction in compensatory strategies, was usually provided in elementary and secondary school learning disability programs. In this article, the compensation strategies used by academically gifted students who succeeded in college are discussed. These include: study strategies, cognitive/learning strategies. compensatory supports, environmental accommodations, opportunities for counseling, self-advocacy, and the development of an individual plan incorporating a focus on metacognition and executive functions.

[1]  Ruth Garner,et al.  VERBAL-REPORT DATA ON COGNITIVE AND METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES , 1988 .

[2]  L. Brinckerhoff.  Promoting Postsecondary Education for Students With Learning Disabilities: A Handbook for Practitioners , 1993 .

[3]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning and study strategies : issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation , 1988 .

[4]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[5]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[6]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  A Componential Theory of Intellectual Giftedness , 1981 .

[7]  P. Gerber,et al.  Speaking for Themselves: Ethnographic Interviews with Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1991 .

[8]  B. Wong.  How do the Results of Metacognitive Research Impact on the Learning Disabled Individual? , 1987 .

[9]  M. Denckla.  Executive function, the overlap zone between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities , 1989 .

[10]  P. Gerber,et al.  Identifying Alterable Patterns in Employment Success for Highly Successful Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  J. Fuster.  Frontal lobes , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  A guidebook for teaching study skills and motivation , 1987 .

[13]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Scatter Analysis of WISC-R Profiles for Learning Disabled Children with Superior Intelligence , 1981, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[15]  Linda E. Brody,et al.  Learning-Disabled/Gifted Children: Identification and Programming , 1983 .

[16]  S. Shaw.  Preparing Students with Learning Disabilities for Postsecondary Education: Issues and Future Needs. , 1991 .

[17]  P. Adelman,et al.  Issues in Program Evaluation , 1993 .

[18]  Learning Strategies for Adults: Compensations for Learning Disabilities , 1991 .

[19]  G. Lyon,et al.  Attention, Memory, and Executive Function , 1995 .

[20]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  LEARNING STRATEGIES: AN OVERVIEW , 1988 .

[21]  J. Whitmore.  Giftedness, Conflict, and Underachievement , 1983 .

[22]  P. Adelman,et al.  Success for college students with learning disabilities , 1993 .

[23]  Cathy Henderson,et al.  College Freshmen with Disabilities, 2001: A Biennial Statistical Profile. , 1995 .

[24]  J. Rees,et al.  The Gifted/Learning Disabled Student , 1987 .

[25]  J. Borkowski,et al.  Theories, models, and measurements of executive functioning: An information processing perspective. , 1996 .

[26]  Susan M. Baum,et al.  Meeting the Needs of Learning Disabled Gifted Students. , 1984 .

[27]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[28]  B. Snider,et al.  Variables Related to the Type of Postsecondary Education Experience Chosen by Young Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[29]  Metacognition, Intelligence and Giftedness , 1987 .

[30]  Linda E. Brody,et al.  Gifted Children with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Issues , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[31]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[32]  Steve Graham,et al.  Improving composition skills of inefficient learners with self‐instructional strategy training , 1987 .

[33]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[34]  S. Owen,et al.  High Ability/Learning Disabled Students: How Are They Different? , 1988 .

[35]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation , 1978 .